FLUMPO235 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Zero said: Apparently the reason is he didn’t play regularly for Roma and he is not an Dutch international That’s ridiculous. He was on loan to Nice hence didn’t play for Roma. The rules have problems Putting 2+2 and getting 5, I can only assume it’s an FA thing to protect English players. Rather than clubs hoovering up rubbish foreign players for cheap money and blocking English players coming through, they at least have to have foreign players who have actually played in the top couple of tiers. seems he’s fallen in some obscure crack. Edited August 31, 2022 by FLUMPO235 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Lack of games for Roma this season. How many have Roma played? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Some jobsworth will probably have concluded Kluivert is shite and is only getting a football career on the back of his dad's name. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 4 hours ago, Decky said: This was a thing before brexit? I've never heard of a non-international player from the EU failing to get a work permit before, so I think that's simply not true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Going entirely off FM-knowledge EU nationals didn’t need work permits but non-EU would. Mental that a star international level European forward isn't a quick rubber stamp mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 (edited) He seems like he's being penalised for playing at a big club and nationality of a big footballing nation and being slightly short ability wise of both? If he played for Feyenoord but was American for example, he'd have been fine? Edited August 31, 2022 by Optimistic Nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommo Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Total disgrace if this isn’t sorted by tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Justin Kluivert should have just said he was conceived in the Bigg Market while he was dad was here and he'd qualify Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samptime29 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 If we play him with Wilson what is formation going to be? 4-1-3-2? Or play 4-3-3 still with Isak on right with ASM on left? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 6 minutes ago, samptime29 said: If we play him with Wilson what is formation going to be? 4-1-3-2? Or play 4-3-3 still with Isak on right with ASM on left? Probably the 4-3-3, with ASM sticking more wide, and Isak tucking in more as a inside forward, with Trippier then providing the width. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 We can't be shoehorning players into our formation by sticking this guy on the right wing, or putting ASM on the right just to play Isak on the left. He is striker. While he seemingly can drift out wide during matches, he's started like 2 matching on LW and RW in his entire career according to transfermarkt. Play him in his natural position together with Wilson, or start him or Wilson on the bench so we have options to change things up during games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Bit leftfield maybe but I reckon Wilson could be very effective on the right of a front 3 in our current set up. There’s a lot of goals to be had from that position with ASM and Bruno supplying. Trippier keeps the width out there as we know. It’s just whether he could do the defensive work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 4 minutes ago, Conjo said: We can't be shoehorning players into our formation by sticking this guy on the right wing, or putting ASM on the right just to play Isak on the left. He is striker. While he seemingly can drift out wide during matches, he's started like 2 matching on LW and RW in his entire career according to transfermarkt. Play him in his natural position together with Wilson, or start him or Wilson on the bench so we have options to change things up during games. I thought it was Howe being diplomatic by saying he can play with Wilson rather than saying "Wilson is a crock, we've bought him in to replace him" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 I'd give this guy as free a role as possible ie behind a main striker either in a 4-3-3 or a 4-4-2. Main reason is he's so good on the ball, lets give it to him as much as possible. Out and out strikers are often feeding on scraps and deprived of space. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 24 minutes ago, Cronky said: I'd give this guy as free a role as possible ie behind a main striker either in a 4-3-3 or a 4-4-2. Main reason is he's so good on the ball, lets give it to him as much as possible. Out and out strikers are often feeding on scraps and deprived of space. Not so sure about that. He's proven himself as a central striker/wide forward, scored plenty of goals from those positions as well so don't see how changing that will contribute to his game in any way. Also, your idea means Wood playing up top again and I'd rather just have Isak up there with ASM, Almiron and Willock/Anderson in behind them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 All fit he’ll probably start wide but essentially be a striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Doesn't make sense to play him wide so we can keep playing Wood. You also lose the work that Miggy does on the right. Guess if ASM is out he could potentially play left, but I'd still rather put Fraser in TBH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 2 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Doesn't make sense to play him wide so we can keep playing Wood. You also lose the work that Miggy does on the right. Guess if ASM is out he could potentially play left, but I'd still rather put Fraser in TBH. If we play Miggy in the 10 he can do what he does on the right, on the left as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 2 minutes ago, Happinesstan said: If we play Miggy in the 10 he can do what he does on the right, on the left as well. Definitely potential for Miggy to play there, guess the worry would be if he runs around too much and doesn't provide enough structure. Wouldn't be against trying it if we don't sign a CM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Definitely potential for Miggy to play there, guess the worry would be if he runs around too much and doesn't provide enough structure. Wouldn't be against trying it if we don't sign a CM. I don't see Miggy playing much differently in the 10 role, just gives him more opportunity to pop up on the left and get a cross in, primarily I want him linking up with Trippier and Bruno, with Isak's priority being to find space in the box. Edited August 31, 2022 by Happinesstan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 He likes to drift in from the left. He could give Liverpool problems drifting off the back of TAA, if he plays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Play him centrally if available! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 So excited to see him play, so angry with this ridiculous delay that's going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 22 minutes ago, Happinesstan said: I don't see Miggy playing much differently in the 10 role, just gives him more opportunity to pop up on the left and get a cross in, primarily I want him linking up with Trippier and Bruno, with Isak's priority being to find space in the box. A number 10 that can't spot a pass, create or shoot. Great aye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Absolute piss take. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now