Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[toon25]

Part of me hopes we do a Marinakis with him

[The College Dropout]

4 minutes ago, toon25 said:

Part of me hopes we do a Marinakis with him

We can’t. There’s no release clause. We can keep him and not do a Marinakis. 

[KaKa]

 

 

 

[NEEJ]

[Robbo2]

I think I'd rather watch my own conception than that

[Sima]

Cunt needs to concentrate on wearing suncream.

[Sean]

Wish this would just get sorted one way or the other, quickly.

[Keegans Export]

I don't understand why we can't go fully public - we value him at £180m or whatever, we won't sell him after 1st August for any amount because we won't have time to source a replacement and if that's a problem for Liverpool then they should have prioritised Isak and not spent £200m on two different players before making their move. Not our problem they now need to sell to buy.

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by Keegans Export

[Nucasol]

46 minutes ago, Robbo2 said:

I think I'd rather watch my own conception than that

As someone once succinctly put it:

 

”I’d rather guide an Alsatian into me nan”

[Fak]

1 hour ago, KaKa said:

 

 

 

[Kid Icarus]

49 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

I don't understand why we can't go fully public - we value him at £180m or whatever, we won't sell him after 1st August for any amount because we won't have time to source a replacement and if that's a problem for Liverpool then they should have prioritised Isak and not spent £200m on two different players before making their move. Not our problem they now need to sell to buy.

 

 

 

Honestly, I think it's because the absolute divies are gearing up to sell him to Liverpool and think it's a smart move.

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[gallowghoul]

54 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

I don't understand why we can't go fully public - we value him at £180m or whatever, we won't sell him after 1st August for any amount because we won't have time to source a replacement and if that's a problem for Liverpool then they should have prioritised Isak and not spent £200m on two different players before making their move. Not our problem they now need to sell to buy.

 

 

 

I reckon the fee is agreed in the background and it’s ducks in a row for both teams 

[Cronky]

Craig Hope on Isak

 

I don't know if this link has been posted yet, but I did find it interesting. Watch from 2-45.

 

I don't think the grievance that Isak supposedly has against the club is valid though.

 

 

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by Cronky

[jackyboy]

This business must be having a detrimental effect on all of the players we have and also any that we might want to bring in.

[gdm]

If you want to ruin your morning 

[BennyBlanco]

1 minute ago, gdm said:

If you want to ruin your morning 

Painfully obvious he’s shilling hard for Liverpool/Isaks agents. God I hate modern football and all that comes with it.

[The Prophet]

Still think there's a chance he might stay for three reasons.

 

1) Liverpool need to sell to buy.

2) We'd need to drop our asking price.

3) We'd only do that if we have adequate cover in i.e. Sesko and Wissa.

 

No idea why Isak and his agent haven't just waited rather than shaft the club and themselves. There will be no shortage of suitors next summer.

[Displayname]

10 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

Etikite is a striker. He’s not playing on the left.  
 

I don’t see them spending £200m on strikers either.  In the same window. To bench one.  
 

Maybe. If they sell Nunez I guess they would need another striker. 

I get that its hard to see Liverpool buying Ekitike just to have him as a backup to Isak.

But for me its harder to see Isak risking his reputation without already knowing that Liverpool wants him.

[gallowghoul]

Just now, Displayname said:

I get that its hard to see Liverpool buying Ekitike just to have him as a backup to Isak.

But for me its harder to see Isak risking his reputation without already knowing that Liverpool wants him.

ekitike is the Diaz replacement in the squad

[Coffee_Johnny]

18 hours ago, tonygreen said:

Isak isn’t forcing a move. He’s just pissed off that the board haven’t delivered what he was promised when he signed. He has a point  

You know this how? 

[duo]

If Diaz goes they will need to replace him and there is a lot of talk about them going for Rodrygo who wouldn't come cheap. 

 

I can't help but think he's too late and his opportunity is gone - Ekitike aside they've Wirtz on their squad list down as a Forward. 

[gallowghoul]

Just now, duo said:

If Diaz goes they will need to replace him and there is a lot of talk about them going for Rodrygo who wouldn't come cheap. 

 

I can't help but think he's too late and his opportunity is gone - Ekitike aside they've Wirtz on their squad list down as a Forward. 

ekitike is the Diaz replacement in the squad 

[duo]

3 minutes ago, gallowghoul said:

ekitike is the Diaz replacement in the squad 

With Wirtz playing the Firmino type role?

[Turnbull2000]

What he saying, that Isak wanted out months ago?

[Mattoon]

After initial denial and defiance to spitting my dummy out and transcribing to the worst possible scenarios I am now feeling a lot more level headed about the situation. 

 

I don't feel like this deal gets done this summer, I think Isak will sign a new contract to up his wages and be told he can go on his merry way next summer and he will be happy with that. It just doesn't make sense for us to allow this to happen at a cut price deal when we could command a better price next summer and he could have his pick of teams.

 

I also think that with the right additions this summer and a strong season he may not even want to leave.