FloydianMag Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 1 minute ago, Wandy said: So if we get the £150m offer you think we should sell? No, no and fucking no……….fuck the dippers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Wandy said: So if we get the £150m offer you think we should sell? I’d love to see us still say no and knock it back. I think the optics are important here, but it’s a balancing act with the practicalities of Howe managing the situation which must be difficult. Edited August 10, 2025 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarie4 Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 4 minutes ago, Wandy said: The only question that remains then is….why haven’t the club put out an official statement saying he is not for sale? That would instantly kill this saga stone dead. So you’d have to think that even the owners haven’t truly made up their mind what to do about Isak. And it’s this indecision and lack of leadership which is killing us and making us a laughing stock. I reckon the club doesn't need to personally. Liverpool, if you believe the journos, were surprised we said no to their bid, with no counter or set price, so they wont bid and will wait until, like Romano says, we "open the door" for them. Thats as close as to saying not for sale as you like. Do you think the board will pay attention to all the Twitter drama and stuff from IndyK? Should they say something about what Romano is saying? I dont think clubs do that. Isak's not for sale, but if Liverpool bids 150 or more, then he's gone. It's really that simple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 56 minutes ago, Andy84 said: According to Ryder (I know but he hasn’t been that bad this summer). Isak was offered an olive branch to come back in for these friendlies but his reaction forced Howe to take him out of the picture all together. very telling that Even more reason to not let him get his way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 They don’t need to say on the website. They’ve said it to the one club who’s been absolutely complicit in this, the player and his agent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 10 minutes ago, tarie4 said: I reckon the club doesn't need to personally. Liverpool, if you believe the journos, were surprised we said no to their bid, with no counter or set price, so they wont bid and will wait until, like Romano says, we "open the door" for them. Thats as close as to saying not for sale as you like. Do you think the board will pay attention to all the Twitter drama and stuff from IndyK? Should they say something about what Romano is saying? I dont think clubs do that. Isak's not for sale, but if Liverpool bids 150 or more, then he's gone. It's really that simple. So he is for sale then. Which would make Edwards' story completely untrue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 Reddit really yukking it up in the comments here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 11 minutes ago, Kanj said: They don’t need to say on the website. They’ve said it to the one club who’s been absolutely complicit in this, the player and his agent. But surely its the fans that need to be thought of here? Its the support that is going through the ringer with this nonsense. Therefore, grow a set, make a statement to your own supporter base and kill this bollocks stone dead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 2 minutes ago, Wandy said: But surely its the fans that need to be thought of here? Its the support that is going through the ringer with this nonsense. Therefore, grow a set, make a statement to your own supporter base and kill this bollocks stone dead. I'll be honest like I feel like whatever the club do/don't do people will complain on the Isak scenario this summer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 6 minutes ago, BlueStar said: Reddit really yukking it up in the comments here They all believe how he's going in is totally OK, they'd throw an absolute fit if it was happening to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 Just now, r0cafella said: They all believe how he's going in is totally OK, they'd throw an absolute fit if it was happening to them. They did! scouser I know refuses to talk about TAA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 1 minute ago, Elliottman said: They did! scouser I know refuses to talk about TAA Can't stand it man, I've got no issues with people not being from the area and adopting a club but fucking hell turn your brains on. Isak is acting like an absolute cunt and has no excuses whatsoever for what he's doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarie4 Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 9 minutes ago, Wandy said: So he is for sale then. Which would make Edwards' story completely untrue. Nah, he's not. We told Liverpool, "Nope" and that was that, no other offers or anything. I'd take 150, but the club might not. That's just how it is, based on what's happened so far. Isak's not going anywhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 12 minutes ago, Wandy said: So he is for sale then. Which would make Edwards' story completely untrue. That’s where I want to point out, no one said the club would let him go if the 150m price is met. That’s what we and the journalist believe, but imo this could be wrong. If the Saudi is taking the toughest stand, the club would still reject the 150m bid and force Isak to stay and apologize. Isak could rlly be not for sale at any price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 13 minutes ago, BlueStar said: Reddit really yukking it up in the comments here Most fans on Reddit are international fans that think see the sport through the lens of a few clubs. We’re a feeder club that should bend the knee, not cause trouble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 42 minutes ago, Zero said: but now he knows it’s completely dead. As much as I want it to be.... I'm not so sure it's completely dead. The noises from us are correct and how they should be IE 'he's going nowhere' But can anyone actually envision him playing for us again? I'm not so sure so I can't bring myself to rule out a late departure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 4 minutes ago, tarie4 said: Nah, he's not. We told Liverpool, "Nope" and that was that, no other offers or anything. I'd take 150, but the club might not. That's just how it is, based on what's happened so far. Isak's not going anywhere. This is a club which literally refused to let Suarez join Arsenal when he wanted to because of a technicality in the wording of a release fee clause. Absolute scummy club who my hatred for has grown to an unhealthy level this summer. I already hated the fuckers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarie4 Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 3 minutes ago, Zero said: That’s where I want to point out, no one said the club would let him go if the 150m price is met. That’s what we and the journalist believe, but imo this could be wrong. If the Saudi is taking the toughest stand, the club would still reject the 150m bid and force Isak to stay and apologize. Isak could rlly be not for sale at any price. That's the thing, right? Just because we'd take 150 doesn't mean he's up for grabs. Real Madrid might offer 170m for Tonali tomorrow. We'd probably take it. But that doesn't mean Tonali's on the market. It's gotta be an offer we can't turn down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 That fat Irish bald melt is starting to get angry now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 2 minutes ago, tarie4 said: That's the thing, right? Just because we'd take 150 doesn't mean he's up for grabs. Real Madrid might offer 170m for Tonali tomorrow. We'd probably take it. But that doesn't mean Tonali's on the market. It's gotta be an offer we can't turn down. Think you’re right but don’t tempt fate…. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 4 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: This is a club which literally refused to let Suarez join Arsenal when he wanted to because of a technicality in the wording of a release fee clause. Absolute scummy club who my hatred for has grown to an unhealthy level this summer. I already hated the fuckers. The wording was fine btw, they just simply refused the head of research in his book admitted they would have lost any case. They activated the media shills and had arsenal mocked endlessly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: The wording was fine btw, they just simply refused the head of research in his book admitted they would have lost any case. They activated the media shills and had arsenal mocked endlessly. Something to do with Suarez and agent thinking it was a release clause, but wording was just that it allowed the player to talk to other clubs, no mention of having to accept it? Schoolboy error but pretty scummy unless I've got that wrong. Still hate the twunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 6 minutes ago, et tu brute said: That fat Irish bald melt is starting to get angry now Hahah what’s his channel called - could do with a laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Kimbo said: Most fans on Reddit are international fans that think see the sport through the lens of a few clubs. We’re a feeder club that should bend the knee, not cause trouble. I genuinely can't decide which would be worse to read, r/soccer or the comments page on a BBC Football article Edited August 10, 2025 by Elric Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 7 minutes ago, et tu brute said: That fat Irish bald melt is starting to get angry now Thought Slot was Dutch? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now