joeyt Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said: Rather than just give the goal? I think a retake, no matter if he scored or didn't, is the fairest outcome Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 No he shouldn't have re-taken it. That's the point I'm making. He should have just got given the goal. I don't see why slipping and double hitting should allow be re-taken, but slipping and hitting it once wouldn't be. As long as it's one obvious motion the outcome should just be whatever happens from the penalty itself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 7 minutes ago, ponsaelius said: No he shouldn't have re-taken it. That's the point I'm making. He should have just got given the goal. I don't see why slipping and double hitting should allow be re-taken, but slipping and hitting it once wouldn't be. As long as it's one obvious motion the outcome should just be whatever happens from the penalty itself. Fair enough, we're both advocating for a rule change to the current one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 Isn't it unfair on the keeper if the player manages some dodgy double kick that completely changes the course of the ball? I was fine with the existing rule. If someone slips, they slip. You don't get a retake if you twat it over the bar cos you slipped. And if someone scuffs the spot up they should be punished for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 1 hour ago, Fak said: why do you regularly post snotty little remarks like this? It wasn’t 🤣🤣 I was answering the question Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 1 hour ago, SEMTEX said: Isn't it unfair on the keeper if the player manages some dodgy double kick that completely changes the course of the ball? I was fine with the existing rule. If someone slips, they slip. You don't get a retake if you twat it over the bar cos you slipped. And if someone scuffs the spot up they should be punished for it. You'd get some smart arses who'd be able disguise it eventually. Disallowing makes sense, re-take is fair enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 Quite a funny but amateurish mistake by Finnish FA couple days ago, when they tried to add new player to womens Nations League squad in place of an injured one, but somehow managed to add 51-year-old that played few NT games in the 90s (same last name, totally different first name). Because of that, they of course couldn't name the player they were trying to add. YLE (our BBC) interviewed the ex-player and said she was never interviewed during her time in the National team or playing football, but once some newspaper had a picture of her after some game, and name was spelled wrong she said she asked if she can now join the bench, but it was more of a joke I guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 Looks like England's Women's team is self destructing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 Name a bigger journeyman than Jefferson Louis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Louis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 11 hours ago, gbandit said: Name a bigger journeyman than Jefferson Louis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Louis Some boy 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 11 hours ago, gbandit said: Name a bigger journeyman than Jefferson Louis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Louis Not really upto speed on I it all but I did hear a bit on the radio, yesterday. Big kerfuffle about Frank Kirby then Millie Bright chucking the towel in but then, at the end, they said the manager hadn't picked them anyway. Sounds like a load of bollox, 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 It looks like Palace’s appeals for dispensation to be allowed into Europe has been rejected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Stifler said: It looks like Palace’s appeals for dispensation to be allowed into Europe has been rejected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 4 minutes ago, Stifler said: It looks like Palace’s appeals for dispensation to be allowed into Europe has been rejected. Good. Wasnt there a deadline before the end of the season where persons with influence at more than one club had to resign one. Sure the fella at Forest had to do it when it looked like they were going to make CL. If they missed then deadline then tough. (This opinion may or not be influenced by their use of a drum in the FA Cup final ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Couldn't happen to a shitter fan base Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
catlover24 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Hilarious that this sends their arch rivals to Europe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 51 minutes ago, geordie_b said: Good. Wasnt there a deadline before the end of the season where persons with influence at more than one club had to resign one. Sure the fella at Forest had to do it when it looked like they were going to make CL. If they missed then deadline then tough. (This opinion may or not be influenced by their use of a drum in the FA Cup final ) The deadline was March 1st. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 I'll be shocked if that stands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 Hope it does. Giving it all high and mighty about our ownership while Textor owns multiple clubs across Europe. Fuck any dispensation, thems the rules. Its a clear conflict of interest. Forest shouldnt be allowed in the same competition as Olympiakos either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 Apparently spot goes to the team with the highest coefficient not in Europe so Man United back in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 7 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said: Apparently spot goes to the team with the highest coefficient not in Europe so Man United back in. Quote In the event of Palace being barred from the Europa League, Forest could be promoted to take their place after qualifying for the Conference League by finishing seventh in the Premier League. Palace’s rivals Brighton, who finished eighth, could then replace Forest in the Conference League. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 7 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said: Apparently spot goes to the team with the highest coefficient not in Europe so Man United back in. Surely not? That's fucking horrific. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now