Jump to content

Newcastle United vs Fulham - 16/12/23 @3pm (No Live TV)


54

Recommended Posts

Just now, Conjo said:

 

Based on his PSG performance he won't be a miss at all until he's fit again.

 

The main reason he's a miss atm is because it means we're back to asking Wilson to play twice a week and 90 minutes here. We all know how that ends :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Smal said:

 

The main reason he's a miss atm is because it means we're back to asking Wilson to play twice a week and 90 minutes here. We all know how that ends :lol: 

 

Of course, don't get me wrong :lol: Was just pointing out that the version of Isak that played against PSG was a complete passenger and woulnd't improve anything if the same version was available today. We might as well play Ritchie or one of the kids as long as Isak can't run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely ridiculous, we get Wilson back and Isak is crocked, once Isak comes back it'll be a game or two before Wilson is injured again, rinse and repeat.

 

Only we could end up with two strikers who are both as injury prone as each other. Absolute waste of time both of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wilson said:

 

Wouldn't have thought so... we don't have that luxury. 

Yeah, if he was as being rested, he would at least be on the bench. Maybe it was for the best to stay out out Europe for the second half of the season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NUFCDoog said:

Absolutely ridiculous, we get Wilson back and Isak is crocked, once Isak comes back it'll be a game or two before Wilson is injured again, rinse and repeat.

 

Only we could end up with two strikers who are both as injury prone as each other. Absolute waste of time both of them

Sensible take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...