Marc Guehi

[KaKa]

Imagine actually stating that a team that just won the title and signed Van Dijk and Salah to new deals at their age ... is not in win now mode.

 

Because they signed two young players, one of whom was one of the best left backs in the league, and the other who was one of the best players in Germany.

 

So incredibly clueless.

[SUPERTOON]

 

[Weezertron]

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

Using that armband photo 

[gbandit]

If the right move doesn’t materialise? What a fucking weird way to put it, he won’t be moving because his owner won’t sell him for anything less than a ransom and because of that he can’t get a top contract

[KaKa]

11 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

 

I can see it happening.

 

One season in Europe with Palace, if they don't get kicked out, and then leave on a free and get a huge contract for it.

 

Will likely be looking for a decent pay day this summer knowing he has that option in a year's time.

 

Will be very surprised if we are still in for him.

 

 

Edited 14 hours ago by KaKa

[SUPERTOON]

It sounds like another summer saga to me.

[midds]

My only observations would be that if Liverpool wanted him AND if Guehi wanted the move to Liverpool then it would probably have already have happened by now? 

 

I'm not that arsed either way but it's an odd one and the fact he's worth 0 in 12 months time means something will probably happen with him after June 30th

[LFEE]

5 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

Called it months ago. That Chelsea sell on clause curtailing his career and his potential finances.

[Andy84]

What’s the alleged fee Palace want? 

[SUPERTOON]

5 minutes ago, Andy84 said:

What’s the alleged fee Palace want? 

Hasn’t been mentioned this summer, think it was 65 million last summer.

[Bunk Moreland]

Palace probably trying to start a bidding war, but don't think us or Liverpool would get involved in that. Don't think Spurs would either tbh

[Sergi1970]

He is the perfect Schar replacement and for 40m it is great deal.

[ExiledGeordie]

10 hours ago, gbandit said:

If the right move doesn’t materialise? What a fucking weird way to put it, he won’t be moving because his owner won’t sell him for anything less than a ransom and because of that he can’t get a top contract

haha spot on and yet Parish risks losing him for nowt next summer because he’s playing “hard ball”

[Groundhog63]

Daft question, or is it? What's the crack if a player signs for a team with a sell on clause and then, subsequently, runs their contract down and leaves for nowt? 

Previous club in the mud? 

 

[Pablo123]

3 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

Daft question, or is it? What's the crack if a player signs for a team with a sell on clause and then, subsequently, runs their contract down and leaves for nowt? 

Previous club in the mud? 

 

I'd imagine so, unless there's a clause within a clause. Clauseception, homes

[Groundhog63]

1 minute ago, Pablo123 said:

I'd imagine so, unless there's a clause within a clause. Clauseception, homes

Aye, I was thinking that. Both clubs get fuck all. Unless there's some clause whereby the player has to get his new club to pay the sell on fee to the previous?

Still be a bargain 😂

[Pablo123]

4 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

Aye, I was thinking that. Both clubs get fuck all. Unless there's some clause whereby the player has to get his new club to pay the sell on fee to the previous?

Still be a bargain 😂

I honestly don't know, mate. It's a business at the end of the day, so you'd think they would cover every eventuality 

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Pablo123
Missed a word out

[TheBrownBottle]

37 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

Daft question, or is it? What's the crack if a player signs for a team with a sell on clause and then, subsequently, runs their contract down and leaves for nowt? 

Previous club in the mud? 

 

Once the contract ends, the club no longer holds the player’s registration, so any clauses applied to the previous contract go with it - otherwise it would be ‘retain and transfer’ through the back door  

[BergenMagpie]

Starting to think he’ll go to a Saudi club on a free next summer 

[gbandit]

Nah, he’ll be in the PL on a huge contract with Liverpool if he doesn’t move this summer 

[aussiemag]

He wants to be a starter though and he has more chance of that at NUFC than LFC. 

[Tsunami]

7 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Nah, he’ll be in the PL on a huge contract with Liverpool if he doesn’t move this summer 

Yeah, I can see a situation where he stays at Palace, gets to play in Europe with them and then fucks off to Liverpool for nowt. 
 

Parish may well want to cash in now but Guehi holds the better cards, there’s no rush for Liverpool to buy him now.

[r0cafella]

8 minutes ago, aussiemag said:

He wants to be a starter though and he has more chance of that at NUFC than LFC. 

If he wants and Konate joins real on a free he will be a starter. 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

12 hours ago, gbandit said:

If the right move doesn’t materialise? What a fucking weird way to put it, he won’t be moving because his owner won’t sell him for anything less than a ransom and because of that he can’t get a top contract

The whole angle is strange. Why say what he’s prepared to do when he’s already been prepared to leave? Bad writing. 

[LFEE]

43 minutes ago, aussiemag said:

He wants to be a starter though and he has more chance of that at NUFC than LFC. 

Real Madrid are already tapping up Konate to run his contract out. So Guehi on a free to replace Konate leaving on a free.