Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KaKa said:

 

Rattled! :lol:

 

You don't have to make up lies out of desperation and shame. That's just really pathetic :lol:

 

We're still waiting for the £60 million you were so sure Man United would get for Garnacho and his Puskas award.

 

Where's the lies KaKa? You're just misremembering.

 

I was asked what I would want if we were to sell Garnacho. Bare in mind this was in the summer of 2025, after he just had a 20+ G&A season. I said I would want £50-60m to entertain it and would prefer if he wasn't sold. Throughout the season I reduced this to reflect his performances and situation, since he was losing favour with Amorim which would obviously reduce his value. 

 

You seem to be taking some sort of moral high ground that after he had a poor season, we sold him for £40m, which is really weird. Don't forget we have a 10% sell on as well. ;) When he's inevitably sold for a profit by Chelsea, the total amount we receive won't even be a kick in the arse off the original amount I said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:

 

I'm happy to shop in the Costcutter yellow sticker whoopsie aisle

Michelle Collins is testament to this.

 

Soz Berb, just spitting facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Where's the lies KaKa? You're just misremembering.

 

I was asked what I would want if we were to sell Garnacho. Bare in mind this was in the summer of 2025, after he just had a 20+ G&A season. I said I would want £50-60m to entertain it and would prefer if he wasn't sold. Throughout the season I reduced this to reflect his performances and situation, since he was losing favour with Amorim which would obviously reduce his value. 

 

You seem to be taking some sort of moral high ground that after he had a poor season, we sold him for £40m, which is really weird. Don't forget we have a 10% sell on as well. ;) When he's inevitably sold for a profit by Chelsea, the total amount we receive won't even be a kick in the arse off the original amount I said.

 

I think you talk so much rubbish you get lost in it all.

 

You weren't asked what you want for Garnacho, you were running your mouth about how he was worth £60 million and nothing less.

 

Now you want to talk about GA to justify this claim of him being worth that amount. Well his best Prem season was 7 goals and 4 assists, which the terrible Elanga has bettered twice, and so I presume Elanga must be worth even more than £60 million then? And so we must have got him at a bargain for £55 million right?

 

Please don't waste my time man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KaKa said:

You weren't asked what you want for Garnacho, you were running your mouth about how he was worth £60 million and nothing less.

 

On 15/05/2025 at 10:48, gbandit said:

How much do you think you could get for Garnacho? And would you like to see him sold?

 

On 15/05/2025 at 10:53, Froggy said:

No I wouldn't want him sold. He's put his head down after being dropped and works his arse off. Doubt there's many under 21 players with as many goal contributions as him over the last few years as well. 

 

Minimum £50-60m though if it was to happen otherwise it wouldn't be entertained.

 

Summer of 2025.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The funniest thing about Froggy is that I don't even think he realises he's doing it despite it being pointed out loads of times. :lol:

 

Defend absolutely everything that Man United as a club does to the hilt: the decisions, the player choices, the spending etc. Right up until the point where the argument that's on the table is that they should be doing better or manager X should have done better.

 

Then * click *

 

17684705320137976896579274933871.thumb.jpg.fd68b0e14b741d0dc11b9f6e26238995.jpg

 

At that point the defence against that argument is that they can't or did in the circumstances because the club is being badly run: made bad decisions, signed the wrong players against the manager's wishes, overspent on fees and wages etc, and that it's all worse than 14 years of Ashley, and Newcastle have spent a fortune, and aren't that good, and Man United still won trophies.

 

Genuinely not having a go, I think it's really funny. :lol: A bit like family, if you or anyone else in the family criticises someone in the family and you all agree, but the moment an outsider says the same thing you all jump to defend them, tell that person to fuck off, and slag off them and their family.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KaKa said:

Now you want to talk about GA to justify this claim of him being worth that amount. Well his best Prem season was 7 goals and 4 assists, which the terrible Elanga has bettered twice, and so I presume Elanga must be worth even more than £60 million then? And so we must have got him at a bargain for £55 million right?

 

Also, one was a teenager, regularly playing for a big club, regularly playing in Europe, scored in a cup final etc. etc. Some would say this is somewhat important.

 

So no, not right. :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Genuinely not having a go, I think it's really funny. :lol:

 

Well that's the goal. I hope you are entertained. Especially since I somewhat like you now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

 

 

Summer of 2025.

 

Yes, I'm sure that's the only instance you have tried to justify your ridiculous valuation of Garnacho.

 

Any back and forth with you is just so pointless and tedious man. You are just so ridiculous :lol:

 

I swear there was even once you were trying to claim Garnacho was worth more than Gordon. I wish I had the patience to sift through all the nonsense but I really don't.

 

Ah, but at least I found the Gordon one ... I think I'll just leave it at that.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

The funniest thing about Froggy is that I don't even think he realises he's doing it despite it being pointed out loads of times. :lol:

 

Defend absolutely everything that Man United as a club does to the hilt: the decisions, the player choices, the spending etc. Right up until the point where the argument that's on the table is that they should be doing better or manager X should have done better.

 

Then * click *

 

17684705320137976896579274933871.thumb.jpg.fd68b0e14b741d0dc11b9f6e26238995.jpg

 

At that point the defence against that argument is that they can't or did in the circumstances because the club is being badly run: made bad decisions, signed the wrong players against the manager's wishes, overspent on fees and wages etc, and that it's all worse than 14 years of Ashley, and Newcastle have spent a fortune, and aren't that good, and Man United still won trophies.

 

Genuinely not having a go, I think it's really funny. :lol: A bit like family, if you or anyone else in the family criticises someone in the family and you all agree, but the moment an outsider says the same thing you all jump to defend them, tell that person to fuck off, and slag off them and their family.

 

 

 

 

He'd make a good lawyer I give him that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KaKa said:

 

Yes, I'm sure that's the only instance you have tried to justify your ridiculous valuation of Garnacho.

 

Any back and forth with you is just so pointless and tedious man. You are just so ridiculous :lol:

 

I swear there was even once you were trying to claim Garnacho was worth more than Gordon. I wish I had the patience to sift through all the nonsense but I really don't.

 

Ah, but at least I found the Gordon one ... I think I'll just leave it at that.

 

 

 

No admission of being wrong I see, despite the evidence.

 

Best you've got is to bring up a tongue in cheek post where I suggest Garnacho is worth £120m. :lol:

 

 

I rest my case your honour.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Froggy said:

 

No admission of being wrong I see, despite the evidence.

 

Best you've got is to bring up a tongue in cheek post where I suggest Garnacho is worth £120m. :lol:

 

 

I rest my case your honour.

 

 

Ah, yes. That one is tongue in cheek. How convenient :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KaKa said:

Ah, yes. That one is tongue in cheek. How convenient :lol:

 

You got me. Despite saying in the same thread I think Garnacho is worth £50m, I definitely was serious suggesting he was worth £120m.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Also, one was a teenager, regularly playing for a big club, regularly playing in Europe, scored in a cup final etc. etc. Some would say this is somewhat important.

 

So no, not right. :lol: 

 

He was playing in a better team, at a so called bigger club, and played more minutes in the Prem than the awful Elanga that season and still couldn't better his Prem numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Froggy said:

 

You got me. Despite saying in the same thread I think Garnacho is worth £50m, I definitely was serious suggesting he was worth £120m.

 

 

 

You're all over the place Froggy. Get it together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Stay out of this Ian. You're too nice to get caught in the crossfire.

 

I'm not. 

 

The way you talk about Man Utd it has me wishing Newcastle was ran so superbly and wondering why you don't win the quadruple every year :lol:

 

You're a lot better than Kaka though. 

 

OK see yous later. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...