Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PauloGeordio said:

He’s not my first choice but if he comes I’m good with it. Only issue with him and Wissa it means both at ACON so I think the club may try to avoid that, but who knows.

Sort of irrelevant as we wont be getting him or Wissa

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are able to get him on loan with buy option (not obligation), I would get him as option, not Isak replacement. We need goalscorer and I trust more Wissa delivering than him but could add options to our play

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gbandit said:

From PSR purposes was he done before the 5 year max period came into effect? Also, aren’t there limitations on the number of players you can loan out now?

He was signed on 30/6/23 which was before both the PL and of course UEFA changed to amortisation rules.

 

His annual amortisation is circa £4 million.

 

In terms of loans yes there are restrictions it’s now down to As things stand we haven’t loaned any player out over the age of 21 

 

Heres an explanation of the rules

 

https://inside.fifa.com/organisation/media-releases/fifa-to-introduce-new-loan-regulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Terraloon said:

He was signed on 30/6/23 which was before both the PL and of course UEFA changed to amortisation rules.

 

His annual amortisation is circa £4 million.

 

In terms of loans yes there are restrictions it’s now down to As things stand we haven’t loaned any player out over the age of 21 

 

Heres an explanation of the rules

 

https://inside.fifa.com/organisation/media-releases/fifa-to-introduce-new-loan-regulations

Thanks for the update, you’re possibly the soundest Chelsea fan I’ve come across 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fak said:

SSN breaking news. Jackson not in tonight's squad and he's asked Chelsea to "explore his options"

 

8 years left on his contract. :lol:

They actually want rid of him as well though. Mad how Chelsea seem to still shift players on expensive long-term contracts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

They actually want rid of him as well though. Mad how Chelsea seem to still shift players on expensive long-term contracts.

They'll probably get £100m from PIF (Saudi team) [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...