All Activity

This is very much Chelsea buying a player just so someone else doesnt get them. They arent going to make a profit by flipping him in a year or so, and hes unlikely to be in their starting 11 given how many better players they already have for his role.

Is it feasible that Chelsea’s squad becomes so big and expensive that it leaves the atmosphere ?

Doesn't take much for Chelsea players to get England caps mind. Chalobah has one.

This cements it for me. Thanks Seegull 👍

I should probably bore off out of this thread and take it to the PIF one tbh . Re: being number 1, PIF always makes really bold claims about its projects, but they rarely live up to the grand expectations they set. I could go on about The Line, Neom, Al-Ula, the Haramain railway, the new airport, even a bloody aquarium; all marketed as “the best in the world,” but while some are impressive, none have really reached that level (some not even close). Also using investment processes to run a football club isn’t that bizarre though? Modern clubs are big businesses and need strategic management. Granted, football clubs are different to a lot of other investments but with the right leadership I don’t see why it’s that ridiculous. Maybe I’m not understanding what your concerns are in that regard.

The buyback on Quansah is hefty-mind. Think they've put it in as an anti-Palmer measure, but not in the Real Madrid way. RM typically sell at a fair price, then has a good buyback or % clause on further transfers. Liverpool has secured a good price, so their buyback is substantial. Guehi is the Konate replacement, it's just a case of bringing it forward if it suits. They like a youngster for the Quansah role - I don't think that fits the win now narrative previously discussed. It's just a continuation of what they wanted with Quansah - it's just that he wanted out.

Meh. I'm a bit disappointed with this one, thought he'd bring us something a bit different. But not too disappointed, if he chose Chelsea then fine, and I suppose we're at least looking at exciting players who might give us different options. And well done to Chelsea for hoarding every player they can buy and to the players who choose them for wanting to be treated like transfer cattle.

Sky sports (Keith Downie) you will be quoting bald cunt Edwards next

You'd imagine his numbers look awful given he played for Soton.

THB is a bit of weird one, captain of the u21s but seemingly little hype even with his England call up. £19m is peanuts for a young England international, is he just not very good?

Ain’t that fussed. Good player. Unlikely to be transformational. A lot of money. Would’ve been happy with him but there’s plenty more fish in the sea. On to the next one.

Be nice to get this 1 confirmed so we can concentrate on some outfield players.

By June 30th? Of course. It became apparent Minteh was going to be sold in the last week or two. Think he rejected Lyon at a higher price. Anderson was later and Vlad later still. But all before 30th June. We dealt with the PSR issue at the very last. Which is why we made such rushed and bad deals. Pretty much every other team had done the bulk of their business prior. Forst sold £50m worth of player to Lyon. Villa did their business earlier, Chelsea, Everton, Leicester etc. or at last the transfers were widely reported.

So just listing every transfer done so far and pretending they were linked with a move to us? Plus a few randoms pulled out of their fat arses. I see theyre still peddling that "stepped aside" bullshit trope from the Pardew years. Conveniently forgetting the signings of Isak, Tonali, Gordon, Trippier etc etc etc any one of which would comfortably be their best player in decades. Inferiority complex rules on wearside, not surprising when you see what a fucking hovel their town is.

How? The idea was that they would be forced to sell some type of prized assets to just become PSR compliant. And they wouldn’t have money to plug gaps in the squad. Thats not going to happen because their owners have been wily with PSR.

there were strong rumours we were selling someone. Gordon, etc

It's coping really. We wanted him, Howe would have improved him, he would have fit in nicely in a 4231 or as a direct Isak rotation option. For me it's just about sitting with how much I loathe Chelsea. They don't need him and their fans aren't that enthusiastic about the signing, and it stinks of 'we don't really want him but you can't have him' - but what pisses me off more than anything is players continuing to choose them. Yes the money, yes London, yes the contract etc, but still, awful club and fans.

Were there particularly strong rumours about Anderson and Minteh before we sold them? Can’t really remember tbh, and all the journos now report that it was ‘well known’ we had to sell to meet the deadline, but I don’t really recall there being a sense of panic on here or elsewhere in the days leading up to it?

Nah, think player buy in has a big say in most transfers, sounds like he's got his heart set on this one with terms being agreed months ago.

No one expecting a twist in the tail on this one? I guess of all the rumours this one has always looked the safest bet.

David's move to Juve being held up by his agents asking for a £13 million commission payment.

Highlights why they’ve got most if not all things right though. What bad calls have they ultimately made? Think Man Utd fans would wish their processes were as thorough as ours since their new owner came in and revised things for example.

Still will. Giving their business in Jan, they’re happy to gamble. So will probably gamble hard they can get top 4 (5) and play with fire. Selling women’s team is short term especially when their commercial revenue isn’t massive.