Greg

Glenn Patterson.

Shearer can f*** off with that - let’s blame the foreign lad who was actually quite good under a proper manager He's right to point it out though. It was the same last week a huge gap from the midfield and forwards, absolutely no possibility to create anything when nobody moves or keeps within a good distance to support. But, in fairness we can see it, Shearer can see it, Bruce obviously cant because he allowed it to happen again. My opinion is he should drop the formation, and stop trying to adopt what the players were doing under Rafa, because Bruce isnt Rafa or as meticulous as the man. Personally I'd go 433 and give Joelinton some support either side with ASM and Almiron. And drop Ritchie playing as a fullback, as ugly as it sounds I'd put Dummett back there. He was going on like it was the players fault though, didn't even mention Bruce is the one telling them how to play, i hope Shearer isn't a Bruce sympathiser. They're mates, so he's not going to lay into him. Did the right then telling him not to take the job. Bruce is a symptom not the problem.

Shambolic organisation at the back.

Could have been a pen to Man City, Skipp pulling Laporte's shirt just before the so called handball.

He was hired because no manager worth their onions and with any credibility would touch the job and we needed someone with three weeks to go unti the start of the season. Complete fucking joke and it lies and door of one man and one man only.

5-0.

We're not playing attacking football. It's just PR rehortic he's been told to spin in the media to try and rubbish Rafa. His tactics are shite because he's incompetent and on record as saying he doesn't believe in tactics.

We really needed an improvement in this area, Ritchie would be horrific and Hayden never more than a filler in this role. We needed an updrade on Yedlin and Manquillo and appear to have bought someone in the same bracket ability wise. So yes, pointless.

What does that even mean? ‘Caught up in their first game’. What a c***. Off all the things he said, while it's a shite excause, it's pretty obvious what he means in relation to the crowd and them being up for it etc. in their first game back in the Premier League after promotion. Shite excuse mind, we were horrific from the first minute.

In the division below.

Horrific defending.

Playing with a flat back 9.

Four defenders on the bench.

This is really useful feedback ?

Here we are: https://nufctrust.co.uk/2019/08/05/nufc-trust-membership-survey-results/ Only 686 out of 4806 are against the idea of a total boycott. The only way they're acting on it is to 'hopefully discuss the results with the club'. Glad I saved that quid, like. People clearly don't read their emails, or listen to what's being said. Which is clearly a problem so need to improve that. People with agenda love kicking people for trying to do something mind. Of the NUST board I think over half boycotted Arsenal, would have to double check the exact figure but certainly close to 50/50. NUST is not a protest group, it doesn't need to tell someone to boycott. You've got loads of other groups already doing that. We are working on a much bigger, long term plan in terms of trying to do something meaningful on fan / supporter ownership but it has to be spot on before we can launch. Talking a lot at the moment with other clubs that have achieved this but also working on other aspects of the plan with lawyers etc. If it's harlf arsed and not done properly it will definately fail so need to get it right and that takes some time. Other things we've done - currently trying to block the Strawberry Place development, have met with the developers and are working with lawyers we've engaged on strategies to stop this. Lots of other stuff going on as well. People very quick to put the boot in and make judegemental statements above without really knowing what's going on. Obviously communication needs to improve as people seem to just hang on to the odd word or statement here or there. As for the survey, we were clear on what it was for at the outset - and it's not just to talk to the club about it but many people are too blinkered to see the bigger picture, the survey is very useful and backed up by a strong member base which makes out voice stronger whoever we talk to, be it the club, Premier League,the FA etc. Do you want it to just become another TMG, or do the same as AO? There's no point in that because those already exist. Trying to do things a little differently and to be ina position where we have the means and backers to go out and do something significant. This all takes time. Too easy to be just a shouting shop but hey that jusy appeases the angries on twitter. Elections to the board later this year.

Shelvey was injured. Bench selection was shambolic yes.

Two in London, two in Copenhagen and two in Bilbao.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Longstaff

They will give him the odd one as long as they're cheap or free I reckon.

Starting today.

He was born in the midlands and grew up in the home counties.

What the hell is a 'tide pod'? Edit: Google tells me they are liquitabs.

I wouldn't say he's horrendous, he's far worse than he is on the left for sure but still prefer him there than Clark or Dummett but it would make us far weaker as a unit you are right - hence I agreed it would be useful to have a cover that can play on the right. Dummett can cover the left so get rid of Clark and bring in a young defender that can play on the right of a three.

And very old.

We're never going to have a squad with 6 good enough centre backs, the cover for Schar in the 3 would be Lejeune moving over and one of the others playing on the left. Problems when both are injured so agree it would be good to have a back up that is comfortable on either side.