AyeDubbleYoo

If that's the case then we won't do it, so it's not really worth worrying about.

Anfield plus £50m.

Actually thought he’d be perfect for the trend of FB moving inside to play more through the middle, but it was quite short-lived.

Was stuck between C and D. He could start in the PL but you would obviously need legs around him.

The idea is dire. The execution is dire.

Got an Instagram ad for a raffle company selling entries to win tickets to the final. They have tickets to every major event and concert. Surely has to be breaking the terms on every one of those tickets.

I don’t think he can be C because a team of his quality players would not be comfortable in the PL. We know because that’s what we used to have

Agree on your underlying point but think people are being very harsh on Pope due to some weird narrative change. He’s been a very good goalkeeper for us.

Nobody can answer that.

I just can’t see how it can ever be fair if it’s based on good or bad luck. Intention has to be the key factor.

For me it should be deliberate handballs only. If you jump to block the ball and it hits you on the hand, that’s just bad luck. Alternatively you could look at a punishment like indirect freekick or something, instead of a pen. A free goal is too consequential in football for such a random event to lead to one.

How do we have any idea what Osula would do?

I would say that's a good thing.

I feel like we've just created this narrative where Dubravka is better than he actually is because he was in the team when we got some wins. Neither is the long-term solution but Pope is the better keeper.

If you can start Miley in CM then you can bring Osula on in attack, shirley. It's probably one of those fan opinion vs professional manager type things.

He gets a bit overconfident at times and that might be why teams lay traps for him. That said, it's a difficult situation for him because he's the one that will end up with space to play. Really hope Botman can get ready for next season, otherwise we need to bring in two CBs in the summer.

I can see the arguments for both TBH, personally I would've gone for Osula because he'd be the one who would be able to score a goal on the counter almost on his own. Wilson doesn't have the legs for that. But I guess things like defending set pieces Wilson might have the edge. I suspect we'd have put the game to bed on the counter is Osula had been on, but who knows.

Genuinely can't believe this. Is it a regular person you sit near?

I assumed he was coming on to play LW and try and score a goal on the counter. There's no point having him on for anything else.

Well yeah, but Anderson has quite a high ceiling and is younger whereas Sean is proven not to be good enough.

This lad is amazingly good, has everything.

He’s in the conversation for our best player IMO. Such a clever player, technically good and dangerous throughout most games. Big fan.

Free hit really, hopefully learn some things that will help us win the cup.

Osula would’ve been the better sub in the circumstances - someone with the legs to finish those breakaway chances. Could’ve finished 5 or 6 to us if we’d brought him on.

Contradictory season in many ways. Very competitive overall but all the important stuff is done and dusted.