Ketsbaia Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Being fair to Andy, it is magnificent when he takes the bobble out his hair. That has to be worth at least £6m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Ermahgerd 16m we should use for debuchy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Silly money that if true, surely we could get better value on the continent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Oh great. Not worth 16m i'm afraid, but if he can come back the same player that left he'll do. Really need a lighting quick forward, than a plodder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Ermahgerd 16m we should use for debuchy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 @indykaila: NUFC and LFC officals were lock in talks last night in London over #Carroll move. Today and tomorrow is key. Fee around 16m. More to come I only post this in here because this dude has been right about loads of Liverpool related stuff this summer (most recently the Sahin deal, Carrolls lack of involvement last week, and also that Rooney wasnt starting on Saturday), but it equally could just be Twitter shit so take it with a pinch of salt. He reckons our first offer was £9.5m plus Ba. Plus he seems to love retweeting people saying he has good info. Losing credibility... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Full of shite. As are 100% of ITK's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 He has been right about pretty much everything he's claimed that I can see. Probably Twitter nonsense, but he seems a better bet than most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 If we spend 16m on Carroll and fail to strengthen defensively I'll be a bit miffed like! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 He has been right about pretty much everything he's claimed that I can see. Probably Twitter nonsense, but he seems a better bet than most. I put ITK's up there with mediums, psychics and zombies, all should be shot in the forehead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 If we spend 16m on Carroll and fail to strengthen defensively I'll be a bit miffed like! Quite frankly i'll be more than a bit miffed considering the money involved, i'd be f*cking outraged. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 £100k bid on Raheem Sterling, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 As it stands a striker is just as much a priority as a defender. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Sell him, everyone pissed off, buy him back again, everyone pissed off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Can't see us spending that on him like, would much rather see us look elsewhere tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Sell him, everyone pissed off, buy him back again, everyone pissed off Haha, true. All about context though isn't it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 As it stands a striker is just as much a priority as a defender. Yes but not for 16m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 love how everyone is so bothered about the price. I'd like Carroll back. Trust the people that got us the best squad we've had in years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 So a player who can't get a game for a worse team would be our joint highest ever signing? Nostalgia ain't cheap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 So a player who can't get a game for a worse team would be our joint highest ever signing? Nostalgia ain't cheap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 love how everyone is so bothered about the price. I'd like Carroll back. Trust the people that got us the best squad we've had in years. Doesn't mean we can't disagree with them, or that they can get it wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 So a player who can't get a game for a worse team would be our joint highest ever signing? Nostalgia ain't cheap. He can't get a game coz the manager dosnt want him, not coz he is shite. Carroll is better than Borini. Not always as simple as you are making out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 and Jonas was on their bench, pretty sure most would consider him a better full back than Simpson... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Well if we're talking context the team worse than us paid £15M for a midfielder from a team which also finished way below us last year. And from reading between the lines we'd be pissed off if we sold either of our Midfield duo for less than £20M. Now I was always of the impression that strikers tend to cost more than midfielders even when not taking into account the young and English factor. So getting a striker we know a lot about and who has been successful for us in the past for less than we'd be prepared to let our midfielders go for wouldn't be such a bad deal no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts