Mattoon Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Jonas gone full radge, love the guy! A big fuck you to our absolutely detestable "club". Hope they all fuck off and very soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/newcastle-united-md-lee-charnley-11188752? Pardew claimed he had told Gutierrez that his time at the club was ending and in evidence to the panel said he “didn’t really fit into the mould I wanted to make”. But the midfielder said that discussion never took place, and in its findings of fact the panel agreed with Gutierrez, calling Pardew’s account of the alleged conversation “inconsistent”. The panel said: “This inconsistency to an extent undermined his (Mr Pardew’s) credibility. The claimant we found to be credible. “Ultimately, on the balance of probabilities and taking into account our assessment of the respective credibility of the claimant and Mr Pardew, we preferred the evidence of the claimant.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmymag Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 The club is fucking rotten, and this is just another example of that fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/newcastle-united-md-lee-charnley-11188752? On Thursday the panel released its 64-page findings in which it expressed “concerns” with Charnley’s evidence, which at times “appeared to be evasive and lacking in credibility.” The report said Charnley “could not say” how many internationals were in the Newcastle squad, which the panel found “rather surprising” and was unaware of Gutierrez’s international record with Argentina. The report said: “Our assessment of his credibility was relevant to the way in which we resolved disputed facts between the parties. By way of example he would not accept in cross examination that the claimant was an established international player when it was not disputed that the claimant has played for Argentina 22 times including playing in the 2010 World Cup. “When asked whether he agreed the claimant was an established international player he responded that he did not have the claimant’s international record. He appeared reluctant to agree that the claimant had played in the World Cup – saying that “he thought the claimant had played some part” and when asked how many other international players were in the squad as at September 2011 his response was that “he could not say”. Given that Mr Charnley (along with other members of the Board) was responsible for decisions as to the composition of the squad this seemed a rather surprising answer.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 How's he doing in La Liga btw? Anyone seen any Deportivo games? He's usually on the bench IIRC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Jonas' tweets Class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 How's he doing in La Liga btw? Anyone seen any Deportivo games? He's usually on the bench IIRC. Probably sums up his role at a good club, bit for every game, but there to be called in and relied upon where the need arises. The guy helped to save us from relegation. He burned himself out for this club for several years whilst others hid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IneedAbed Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 It seems strange but today is one of those days where I have actually enjoyed following our football club owner/board are a bunch of cunts we are the club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/newcastle-united-md-lee-charnley-11188752? On Thursday the panel released its 64-page findings in which it expressed “concerns” with Charnley’s evidence, which at times “appeared to be evasive and lacking in credibility.” The report said Charnley “could not say” how many internationals were in the Newcastle squad, which the panel found “rather surprising” and was unaware of Gutierrez’s international record with Argentina. The report said: “Our assessment of his credibility was relevant to the way in which we resolved disputed facts between the parties. By way of example he would not accept in cross examination that the claimant was an established international player when it was not disputed that the claimant has played for Argentina 22 times including playing in the 2010 World Cup. “When asked whether he agreed the claimant was an established international player he responded that he did not have the claimant’s international record. He appeared reluctant to agree that the claimant had played in the World Cup – saying that “he thought the claimant had played some part” and when asked how many other international players were in the squad as at September 2011 his response was that “he could not say”. Given that Mr Charnley (along with other members of the Board) was responsible for decisions as to the composition of the squad this seemed a rather surprising answer.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 It's no surprise that the squad is a mess when the man responsible for buying the players hasn't got a clue about the ones already at the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 All his tweets from today: Those tweets actually piss me right off, he's showing more passion for a club who shit on him than the current bunch of tossers have shown collectively all season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 He's showing passion and love for a city and its people which we all still have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Get in Jonas Kick em in the nuts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 He literally kept us up last year too It's weird like, but we really need someone like him on the pitch now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 If all the players had Jonas' feel for the club we wouldn't be heading for Championship oblivion now. Glad he won his case, KK first, now Jonas, who will be the third member of the 'beat Ashley in court' club..?? What a total shambles it all is... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 He literally kept us up last year too[emoji38] It's weird like, but we really need someone like him on the pitch now. Great bloke and all but lets not forget how dreadful at football he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 He literally kept us up last year too[emoji38] It's weird like, but we really need someone like him on the pitch now. Great bloke and all but lets not forget how dreadful at football he is. Would have been a million per cent better than Anita or colback in cm tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Sounds mortal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/newcastle-united-md-lee-charnley-11188752? On Thursday the panel released its 64-page findings in which it expressed “concerns” with Charnley’s evidence, which at times “appeared to be evasive and lacking in credibility.” The report said Charnley “could not say” how many internationals were in the Newcastle squad, which the panel found “rather surprising” and was unaware of Gutierrez’s international record with Argentina. The report said: “Our assessment of his credibility was relevant to the way in which we resolved disputed facts between the parties. By way of example he would not accept in cross examination that the claimant was an established international player when it was not disputed that the claimant has played for Argentina 22 times including playing in the 2010 World Cup. “When asked whether he agreed the claimant was an established international player he responded that he did not have the claimant’s international record. He appeared reluctant to agree that the claimant had played in the World Cup – saying that “he thought the claimant had played some part” and when asked how many other international players were in the squad as at September 2011 his response was that “he could not say”. Given that Mr Charnley (along with other members of the Board) was responsible for decisions as to the composition of the squad this seemed a rather surprising answer.” The tribunal might be "rather surprised" that Charnley is an ignorant and incompetent wanker, but we aren't. Would be funny if the club appealed and part of their claim included dozens of other quotes demonstrating Charnley knows nothing and has no business running a football club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Love how they've managed to sum up the characters of the people involved perfectly in just a few words each: Jonas - 'credible and convincing witness.' All round great guy. Pardew - on the face of things he's 'confident, convincing' but in reality 'the detail was not necessarily as credible as the manner in which it was delivered.' A fucking liar and a fraud. Charnley - 'evasive and lacking in credibility.' Says it all really. Carver - 'vague' and 'rejected.' Thick as pig shit. They've got them all completely sussed after just a couple of days in court Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Get in Jonas Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 If all the players had Jonas' feel for the club we wouldn't be heading for Championship oblivion now. Glad he won his case, KK first, now Jonas, who will be the third member of the 'beat Ashley in court' club..?? What a total shambles it all is... What's the first rule merlin? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Love how they've managed to sum up the characters of the people involved perfectly in just a few words each: Jonas - 'credible and convincing witness.' All round great guy. Pardew - on the face of things he's 'confident, convincing' but in reality 'the detail was not necessarily as credible as the manner in which it was delivered.' A fucking liar and a fraud. Charnley - 'evasive and lacking in credibility.' Says it all really. Carver - 'vague' and 'rejected.' Thick as pig shit. They've got them all completely sussed after just a couple of days in court My exact thoughts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/jonas-gutierrez-tribunal-examine-key-11190810#rlabs=16%20rt$sitewide%20p$4 I think the following is pretty conclusive. The panel heard Charnley emailed Newcastle United secretary Richard Hines, inquiring about the clause and how it was affected by the players loan move to Norwich City. It said: “Please can you check the wording of his extension clause. I just want to be sure that it is Premier League matches for us that count. I don’t want him making 8 starts for Norwich and him triggering the clause. I’m 99% sure it is fine - just double checking” The tribunal said if the contract clause had not been an issue, Charnley would have had no reason to check on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 What a useless cunt, if you're going to be a snide cunt you don't leave a paper trail you total fucking knacker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now