Jump to content

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

There's an element of nufc twitter that definitely seems to have a problem with women being involved in supporting the club / having a social media presence. 

That's weird like. Don't see why it matters what people are. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Biggsbond14
4 hours ago, Thomson Mouse said:

No idea who any of them are apart from the dentist and cunt chops wraith 

All part of his wankerdom, she and some other random birds did a female only podcast and Wraith probably sitting with no kegs on wanking over them, the junior holly child who was licking Amandas hoop on takeover day thinks she is the female version of wraith now “spokesperson for the fans “ . Incidentally Wraith was accused by many on Twitter of grooming her ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

No smoke without fire, mate.

 

Bloke in his fifties meeting up with a sixteen year-old girl he met on the internet is definitely nonceworthy.

 

He's also bald.  And a Tory.

 

 

Edited by Sima

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Pogba contract expires in the summer as well. Same position right?


Kulusevski says he prefers to play as a central attacking midfielder or as a striker, but I think his best position is at right wing. He’s extremely good and got a huge potential.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s already good and will become even better. Think I see him more as a winger/wide forward than a striker or AMC. Guess he wants to be central to see much of the ball but he’s also quick and good off the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't normally want someone like him because of attitude and wages. But, take him in on loan. Maybe i'm naive to think this but i reckon he'd like to say "fuck off" to doubters saying he's this and that. Perhaps this could be his motivation to do well?

Maybe just maybe a new environment could have him perform for us for the rest of the season. There's always risk buying someone new to the league too. I'm undecided really. If we had more time and were safe id easily say no thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SweMag said:


Kulusevski says he prefers to play as a central attacking midfielder or as a striker, but I think his best position is at right wing. He’s extremely good and got a huge potential.

 

Just get his mate Krafth to give him a bell

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still remember that game. After the match, Aubameyang looked to the heavens at the onlooking Sir Bobby Robson and asked, "how did I do boss?" Bobby replied, "you'll do for me in 9 and a half years time, son."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gazzaschicken said:

 

Then I wonder, if a team has sold a player after the game is postponed. Is it ok to take him back for one game when the game is re-arranged?

 

Would Hassenhüttl and Moyes (if it was the case) let their new top signing, from a rival club, leave to play a game for the rival club against their own club?

 

It's a scenario that could happen. And where should the line be drawn. It' always some clubs that will gain and some who would lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not hard to pull this argument down with the simple question stated above.  Again, extend it to if the coaching staff have been sacked as well.

 

Again though, the total sycophants that turn up to these press conferences whether it be sport, entertainment, politics or anything else for that matter let this illogical drivel be spouted and broadcast with absolutely no questioning of it over fear of losing their future access.  
 

Shit message gets out and the follow-ups don’t get nowhere near as big a platform as the original drivel spouted.

 

It fucking stinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toon No9 said:

Then I wonder, if a team has sold a player after the game is postponed. Is it ok to take him back for one game when the game is re-arranged?

 

Would Hassenhüttl and Moyes (if it was the case) let their new top signing, from a rival club, leave to play a game for the rival club against their own club?

 

It's a scenario that could happen. And where should the line be drawn. It' always some clubs that will gain and some who would lose.


And what about the fixture list where some clubs have played teams before those teams bought new players in the transfer window and some haven’t? Shouldn’t we therefore make teams put the same lineup out against every team and not play their new players. 
 

It just gets ridiculous. They all need to stop whingeing and if Moyes and Hassenhuttl need new players then they should buy them out of their own pocket. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...