Deuce Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 It shows how utterly mental football fans are really. The fact there's anything tribal about this is utterly stupid. Yup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Probabaly already been answered but what is the difference between "sexual activity with a child" and "sexual activity with a girl under 16" ? I realise they could be different counts of the same type of offence, like 12 seperate counts of burglary but it seems strange to word them differently. It could depend on what age the person was when activity started and what age they were when it ended....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Well this is going to be a delightful saga in the Newcastle-Sunderland soap opera. Mackems back-peddling and victim-blaming, Mags lobbing paedo jokes that won't even be remotely funny to anyone with half a brain (yet hilarious to the average retard amongst our fan base). Good times, good times. This In one but their club must have known and that makes it even worse that they actually still continued to play him. Agreed - but the mackems will say as far as they knew, he was pleading not guilty. It's more to do with him being one of their best players and also given their position. Football Clubs and morality often rarely go together - we also know all about that. Thing is, if Sunderland had stated from the outset that Johnson was innocent until proven guilty and that he would continue to play for them as normal until a verdict had been made, I doubt many would have taken objection to it. It's the fact that they suspended him first, then rescinded it as soon as Advocaat realised how bad their squad was that makes them look really bad in all of this imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Any pics of her? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I hope it f***s their season up or they wear supportive t-shirts like lolerpool did for suarez and make the situation a million times worse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Those Suarez shirts man, just the worst. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Probabaly already been answered but what is the difference between "sexual activity with a child" and "sexual activity with a girl under 16" ? I realise they could be different counts of the same type of offence, like 12 seperate counts of burglary but it seems strange to word them differently. It could depend on what age the person was when activity started and what age they were when it ended....... prepubescent = child. (so I read elsewhere) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 12 and under. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Probabaly already been answered but what is the difference between "sexual activity with a child" and "sexual activity with a girl under 16" ? I realise they could be different counts of the same type of offence, like 12 seperate counts of burglary but it seems strange to word them differently. It could depend on what age the person was when activity started and what age they were when it ended....... prepubescent = child. (so I read elsewhere) you sure as he's been charged with both, guilty to one denying the other according to the beeb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 There's only one alleged victim, so it seems unlikely that would be the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Well this is going to be a delightful saga in the Newcastle-Sunderland soap opera. Mackems back-peddling and victim-blaming, Mags lobbing paedo jokes that won't even be remotely funny to anyone with half a brain (yet hilarious to the average retard amongst our fan base). Good times, good times. This Oh Aye, it'll showcase the north east at its finest!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 You'd think his classy employers are due an announcement of some sort? Or will they wait for the final verdict despite him pleading guilty? "Innocent until sentenced marra" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 He scores goals He likes underage hole’s He’s worse than a thousand Jimmy’s and Noels He courts young girls (Also known as grooming) He downloads kiddie porn ( I’m also assuming) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 You'd think his classy employers are due an announcement of some sort? Or will they wait for the final verdict despite him pleading guilty? "Innocent until sentenced marra" They've handled the whole thing terribly. Wouldn't surprise me if they went and named the family enclosure after him now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Technically he's a haebephile I.e pubescent. Still illegal of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 He scores goals He likes underage hole’s He’s worse than a thousand Jimmy’s and Noels He courts young girls (Also known as grooming) He downloads kiddie porn ( I’m also assuming) I'll bet you've done most of the above too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 He scores goals He likes underage hole’s He’s worse than a thousand Jimmy’s and Noels He courts young girls (Also known as grooming) He downloads kiddie porn ( I’m also assuming) I'll bet you've done most of the above too. Not very nice accusation to make pet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 There's a thread on RTG with videos of their fans and going on about how great their fans are. Anyone want to post the he shags who he wants video? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Interesting to see RTG deleting any post relating to this citing legal consequences when they'll happily discuss how best to get the 3pm kick-offs every week. How are these two things even related? The reason why it's unwise to comment on an ongoing court case of this nature is simple, it's called contempt. Websites, just like any other media, are liable to prosecution for anything which is posted that may be prejudicial to the case . I'll comment fully when the case concludes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Any pics of her? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Interesting to see RTG deleting any post relating to this citing legal consequences when they'll happily discuss how best to get the 3pm kick-offs every week. How are these two things even related? The reason why it's unwise to comment on an ongoing court case of this nature is simple, it's called contempt. Websites, just like any other media, are liable to prosecution for anything which is posted that may be prejudicial to the case . I'll comment fully when the case concludes. Both are questionable from a legal standpoint but only one is frowned upon massively on there and threatened with a ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Redcafe have locked their thread on the matter until the trial's over FWIW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 It's definitely the right call by RTG, it's loosely moderated at best, never know what some of those people would say in one of the 30 threads they'd have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yeah contempt of court is a very serious matter so rtg is sensible to lock any threads down. It is very unlikely that such a series of events would occur, but if a juror decided to look at what the Newcastle fans were saying and something they saw on here prejudiced their decision, and caused problems with the trial, the causant posters and website owners could well be dragged before a judge. Contempt of court might well be why Sunderland were forced to unsuspend him in the first place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts