Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mackem on the radio saying Sunderland's hand were tied - they couldnt sack him because it was pre-judging guilt. Then if he was found not guilty, they sacked an innocent man.

 

Also saying everyone is sexist and can't deal with the fact Margaret Byrne is a woman :lol:  Oh and the media are a disgrace for the way they're going after Sunderland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mackem on the radio saying Sunderland's hand were tied - they couldnt sack him because it was pre-judging guilt. Then if he was found not guilty, they sacked an innocent man.

 

Also saying everyone is sexist and can't deal with the fact Margaret Byrne is a woman :lol:  Oh and the media are a disgrace for the way they're going after Sunderland

 

Suspension is not viewed as a punishment and therefore Sunderland would have done nothing wrong by keeping him suspended.

 

The issue is not because they didn't sack him, the issue is un-suspending him and playing him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

If Johnson did any work with the Sunderland kids in the academy of light over the past 12 months they will get a huge fine and possibly have their coaching suspended for not disclosing his crimes to the DBS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mackem on the radio saying Sunderland's hand were tied - they couldnt sack him because it was pre-judging guilt. Then if he was found not guilty, they sacked an innocent man.

 

Also saying everyone is sexist and can't deal with the fact Margaret Byrne is a woman[emoji38] Oh and the media are a disgrace for the way they're going after Sunderland

Should've asked him how the Beeb were able to suspend their presenters until their court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think if we are 2 points adrift of Sunderland in 17th on the final game, and Sunderland get a huge fine and 3 points deducted.  That would be wonderful.

 

We'd still end up going down though :lol:

 

How?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the question why they kept playing him pretty clear though? They were (are) s*** and needed the nonce to stay in the Premier League.

 

Yes. They valued staying on the Premier League gravy train as more important than the feelings and well being of the victim and her family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the question why they kept playing him pretty clear though? They were (are) shit and needed the nonce to stay in the Premier League.

 

Of course it's clear, but you can't fine someone for being a cunt. You can't prosecute someone when they haven't broken the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...