sbnufc Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 The FA definitely wont do anything like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 remember when that guy punched a horse tho lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 That's what he pleased guilty to, basically. So how come they didn't sack him till be pleased guilty? They knew he did it, but were assuming he'd lie and please not guilty? Please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Wow. Not looking good for the mackems then! Grubby and seedy all round. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Obviously not arsed about the footballing side of things or points reductions as it's all unimportant, but there should definitely be an independent or F.A inquiry into why they allowed someone who they knew from his own words was a paedophile and that the lead inspector in the case advised them to safeguard him away from young people. That's extremely bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 The FA definitely wont do anything like They wouldn't touch it with a shitty stick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 remember when that guy punched a horse tho lol FTM 9-1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes_End_Mag Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 The FA definitely wont do anything like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 remember when that guy punched a horse tho lol 'Your star player's a confessed paedophile and your club deliberately covered it up' might just be the comeback of all comebacks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 The FA definitely wont do anything like Fix the derby and we'll call it squits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Hmm, where's this going? It would suggest that there's a dodgy photo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Hmm, where's this going? It would suggest that there's a dodgy photo. might end up with him stripped in front of the jury to compare? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Points deduction is the norm for this sort of situation. eh? Do you not know about all of the previous precedents? I wasn't being serious man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes_End_Mag Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Makes sense as to why Sunderland didn't decide to sue him after releasing him if they've been in the know all along. Disgusting club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Hmm, where's this going? It would suggest that there's a dodgy photo. Bit sick of that journalist typing everything people say in a North Eastern accent. Just type 'my legs' not 'me legs' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 God, I just think of all those posts on that Sunderland site talking of pride in the club, like they were being persecuted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Johnson had just said that a Google search carried out on his phone for the legal age of consent "had nothing at all" to do with the girl. This search was done just a few days after his second meeting with her, in which they kissed. Of course edit "It had nothing to do with her age. We were taking about stuff in the dressing room about a programme that was on a couple of nights before about different ages. Lots of players in our team are from all sorts of counties and we were having a discussion of laws and rules in different places in the world." AJ's evidence just now. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Hmm, where's this going? It would suggest that there's a dodgy photo. Bit sick of that journalist typing everything people say in a North Eastern accent. Just type 'my legs' not 'me legs' 'Tha reckun it meks them mor aerodeenamic like' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Big Marge Knew? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Johnson had just said that a Google search carried out on his phone for the legal age of consent "had nothing at all" to do with the girl. This search was done just a few days after his second meeting with her, in which they kissed. Of course edit "It had nothing to do with her age. We were taking about stuff in the dressing room about a programme that was on a couple of nights before about different ages. Lots of players in our team are from all sorts of counties and we were having a discussion of laws and rules in different places in the world." AJ's evidence just now. :lol: Buzzing if they have an old copy of the Radio Times to disprove this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Johnson had just said that a Google search carried out on his phone for the legal age of consent "had nothing at all" to do with the girl. This search was done just a few days after his second meeting with her, in which they kissed. Of course edit "It had nothing to do with her age. We were taking about stuff in the dressing room about a programme that was on a couple of nights before about different ages. Lots of players in our team are from all sorts of counties and we were having a discussion of laws and rules in different places in the world." AJ's evidence just now. :lol: Buzzing if they have an old copy of the Radio Times to disprove this. Prosecution will surely call him out on that when it's their turn. "what program?" 'fuck knas' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Josh Halliday @JoshHalliday 19m19 minutes ago Discussing photo of AJ on hol with WBA's Chris Brunt and James Morrison, AJ confirms he shaves his chest "for tanning purposes" in summer I've had darker pints of milk than that nonce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Josh Halliday @JoshHalliday 19m19 minutes ago Discussing photo of AJ on hol with WBA's Chris Brunt and James Morrison, AJ confirms he shaves his chest "for tanning purposes" in summer I've had darker pints of milk than that nonce. Check oot me tan http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article7415363.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/Footballer-Adam-Johnson-arrives-at-Bradford-Crown-Court.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Too busy noncing to get himself to Kwik Tan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 There's just something sinister about that place. Wonder if the parents will still be taking their kids to that classy club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts