Flip Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Flip if this was the first time I'd agree with you, its the third f*cking time though he has to be taught a lesson. First time he was charged with a racist remark he was given 8 games, first time Terry did it he was given 4games. Defoe was given a yellow for his bite while Suarez got 10 for his bite. There's just no consistency in football, like I said I'm all for this punishment if it actually led somewhere when other players did things as bad. I just think that limiting him from training with his team or going to watch a game is ridiculous. I don't think the amount of games per se is ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The s*** being peddled for Suarez. Comparable examples would be players who have done the same piece of violent conduct three times (beyond the ambit or foresight of the rules of the game at that) with the final example being during the biggest sporting spectacle in the world. Joey Barton has no place in this conversation. For a start he was dealt with by the UK Criminal Justice System and the Football Association of England and Wales. Fifa gets something right and people still hen peck. When Suarez has been dealt by the FA he's been hit harder than Barton despite Barton clearly doing terrible stuff. When Terry (with clear evidence!!) was charged for racism he got less than Suarez as well. There's no consistency. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppaz Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Wonder what the odds on Suarez to catch the ball defending his team's goal to stop them conceding within the next season are? Surely worthy of a daft bet That's 'cheating' within the rules. Completely irrelevant. But neither option is irrevalent with this guy though. He takes his society back to the primative age yet he should be held against modern society's standards. The outcry when he has though... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 He's a Liverpool player, they signed him, they pay him, he represents them at all times, maybe not no the field but he's their player 100%. If he's going to consistently act like a horrible cunt the he's going to get himself banned regularly. If Liverpool can't accept it and tolerate it then they need to move him on. The player has been banned and it's tough shit for Liverpool and tough shit for Uruguay. Not even the merest hint of a scrap of sympathy. Signed a cunt? Deal with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 He's a Liverpool player, they signed him, they pay him, he represents them at all times, maybe not no the field but he's their player 100%. If he's going to consistently act like a horrible cunt the he's going to get himself banned regularly. If Liverpool can't accept it and tolerate it then they need to move him on. The player has been banned and it's tough shit for Liverpool and tough shit for Uruguay. Not even the merest hint of a scrap of sympathy. Signed a cunt? Deal with it. It's worse than that though really. It's not just that they signed him, not just that they failed to apply sanctions when he fell out of line but that in addition to both these things, they actively backed the douche. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andydunc Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-28064420 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 He's a Liverpool player, they signed him, they pay him, he represents them at all times, maybe not no the field but he's their player 100%. If he's going to consistently act like a horrible cunt the he's going to get himself banned regularly. If Liverpool can't accept it and tolerate it then they need to move him on. The player has been banned and it's tough shit for Liverpool and tough shit for Uruguay. Not even the merest hint of a scrap of sympathy. Signed a cunt? Deal with it. It's worse than that though really. It's not just that they signed him, not just that they failed to apply sanctions when he fell out of line but that in addition to both these things, they actively backed the douche. Was more a comment made about the fact he's been banned for Liverpool games despite biting in a Uruguay shirt. Still the same bloke... One more thing too. He's whining on saying he's being persecuted and picked on by the British press but casually forgetting the same group of people voted him the best player in the league last season. He's just an utter cunt who refuses to accept responsibility for his cuntish behaviour. Fuck him and fuck Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The three-man defence has been highly successful so far. A three-man defence has played a four-man defence (at least from the start) on ten occasions. These matches have produced eight victories for the three-man defence, and two draws. A back four is yet to beat a back three. There have been two meetings between three-man defences, Uruguay 1-0 Italy and Netherlands 2-0 Chile. Thought this was interesting. It's definitely back in fashion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The three-man defence has been highly successful so far. A three-man defence has played a four-man defence (at least from the start) on ten occasions. These matches have produced eight victories for the three-man defence, and two draws. A back four is yet to beat a back three. There have been two meetings between three-man defences, Uruguay 1-0 Italy and Netherlands 2-0 Chile. Thought this was interesting. It's definitely back in fashion. certainly seen an increase in usage in last few years I've noticed, I half wonder if its because tbh these days you'd be hard pressed to name many defenders who are of the same level of quality of the past so 3 of them to compensate. Wonder how many sides will adopt it after the world cup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Tabarez all but saying that the english media made FIFA ban Suarez for so long the self same english media that FIFA despises for asking awkward questions about how corrupt the organisation is. Didn't seem to admit that Suarez was actually in the wrong either judging by journos on twitter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Let's all try biting somebody at work, see what happens, then compare notes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The three-man defence has been highly successful so far. A three-man defence has played a four-man defence (at least from the start) on ten occasions. These matches have produced eight victories for the three-man defence, and two draws. A back four is yet to beat a back three. There have been two meetings between three-man defences, Uruguay 1-0 Italy and Netherlands 2-0 Chile. Thought this was interesting. It's definitely back in fashion. certainly seen an increase in usage in last few years I've noticed, I half wonder if its because tbh these days you'd be hard pressed to name many defenders who are of the same level of quality of the past so 3 of them to compensate. Wonder how many sides will adopt it after the world cup. I think it makes sense since there are hardly any wingers or traditional centre forwards any more. Fullbacks are kind of weird. Weirder still that we play with 4 or 5, but that's another story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 3 at the back can be great with certain type of players, but it all needs to fit seamlessly as Juve found out in CL it has some major weaknesses against teams with lots of width. Can't really see it catching on the PL at least unless teams plan to build around a 3 man defense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Mags Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Let's all try biting somebody at work, see what happens, then compare notes. I have considered this from time to time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 What does she look like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Mags Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 What does she look like? Very tasty looking ass Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Can't muster any sympathy at all for the "But Miss, other boys..." angle at all. It's exactly the kind of punishment to be expected for biting someone, for the third time, in the middle of FIFA's flagship competition, with aggravating factors like zero remorse and trying to deceive the referee through feigning he was the victim. Not excessive, doesn't demonstrate any outrageous inconsistency, completely deserved, entirely his own fault. Malicious, calculated, devious, cowardly. Just like the person behind it. Increase it for the frivolous appeal, the sport is better off without him. Nail on head! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Makes me laugh how they say he needs 'treatment' or some some sort of rehab. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 I'm starting to think that all of Uruguay may need therapy. How's this all going down in Liverpool? They usually love a good Suarez defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 I'm starting to think that all of Uruguay may need therapy. How's this all going down in Liverpool? They usually love a good Suarez defence. It's hard to tell, they keep locking threads about it on RAWK. The general tactic seems to be to avoid all discussion of the indecent and instead focus on players who stamped or headbutted someone ten years ago. Or quickly skip over 'yes he shouldn't have done it but...' before characterising any criticism or punishment of Suarez as wild eyed witchhunt implying he's worse than paedohilter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 1994 Official Fifa Film was on BBC Two this morning. My first World Cup man. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/210/519/tumblr_lvhuuq55N71qhoyau.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Can't muster any sympathy at all for the "But Miss, other boys..." angle at all. It's exactly the kind of punishment to be expected for biting someone, for the third time, in the middle of FIFA's flagship competition, with aggravating factors like zero remorse and trying to deceive the referee through feigning he was the victim. Not excessive, doesn't demonstrate any outrageous inconsistency, completely deserved, entirely his own fault. Malicious, calculated, devious, cowardly. Just like the person behind it. Increase it for the frivolous appeal, the sport is better off without him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Uruguay boss Oscar Tabarez has accused FIFA of making Luis Suarez a "scapegoat" and resigned from his role within football's governing body in protest over the striker's punishment. Suarez was banned on Thursday for nine international matches and suspended from any involvement in football for four months after biting an opponent in Uruguay's 1-0 World Cup Group D win over Italy. The Liverpool striker flew back home to Montevideo in disgrace after his FIFA accreditation was withdrawn, prohibited from remaining with his team-mates in Brazil. But on the eve of Uruguay's last-16 clash with Colombia, Tabarez insisted Suarez was the victim of a witch-hunt and said his position on FIFA's Technical Study Group - an expert panel which analyses international matches - was now untenable. "It is not wise or prudent to be in an organisation with people, those who exerted pressure to promote this decision and those who rendered the punishment, who managed procedures and values very different to those I have," Tabarez told reporters at his pre-match press conference. "Therefore, in the coming days, I will file my resignation to that position formally." Tabarez refused to take questions on Suarez, instead reading a lengthy statement in which he blasted the forward's ban as "excessively severe," accused FIFA of pandering to English-speaking media and pledged unwavering support to the 27-year-old. "We saw the (images of the bite) afterwards and saw that there was a certain possibility of punishing the participants in that action: both (Giorgio) Chiellini and Suarez," Tabarez said. "I don't deny that we were waiting a punishment. But we never imagined the severity of the punishment meted out. "Before and after the Suarez-Chiellini episode, we have seen things measured with a completely different meter. "(This decision) is much more focused on the opinions of the media - the media that attacked immediately after the conclusion of the match. At the press conference, the only topic journalists spoke about was that one. I don't know what their nationality was but they all spoke English. "As a coach and as a professor - I have also been a teacher in my life - I am presented with the theory of the scapegoat. We agree with the basis of (the punishment), obviously, but there is a danger in proceeding this way. Many times, you tend to forget the scapegoat is a person that has rights. "With this decision, who wins or who won? Who loses? Who was benefited? Who is harmed? Who ended up getting things their way?" Tabarez ended his monologue with a message for Suarez, before departing the Maracana auditorium to a standing ovation from several Uruguayan journalists. He added: "To conclude, to Luis Suarez, to Luis Suarez the person, who has lived with us and worked with us, someone we know better than anyone else, he will never be alone." Suarez returned to a hero's welcome from hundreds of fans at Montevideo airport, from where he was whisked to his mother's home in the southern province of Canelones. The Uruguayan FA has confirmed its intention to appeal sanctions against Suarez but the striker stands to be suspended until the end of October. Stay classy Uruguay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Uruguay boss Oscar Tabarez has accused FIFA of making Luis Suarez a "scapegoat" and resigned from his role within football's governing body in protest over the striker's punishment. Suarez was banned on Thursday for nine international matches and suspended from any involvement in football for four months after biting an opponent in Uruguay's 1-0 World Cup Group D win over Italy. The Liverpool striker flew back home to Montevideo in disgrace after his FIFA accreditation was withdrawn, prohibited from remaining with his team-mates in Brazil. But on the eve of Uruguay's last-16 clash with Colombia, Tabarez insisted Suarez was the victim of a witch-hunt and said his position on FIFA's Technical Study Group - an expert panel which analyses international matches - was now untenable. "It is not wise or prudent to be in an organisation with people, those who exerted pressure to promote this decision and those who rendered the punishment, who managed procedures and values very different to those I have," Tabarez told reporters at his pre-match press conference. "Therefore, in the coming days, I will file my resignation to that position formally." Tabarez refused to take questions on Suarez, instead reading a lengthy statement in which he blasted the forward's ban as "excessively severe," accused FIFA of pandering to English-speaking media and pledged unwavering support to the 27-year-old. "We saw the (images of the bite) afterwards and saw that there was a certain possibility of punishing the participants in that action: both (Giorgio) Chiellini and Suarez," Tabarez said. I don't deny that we were waiting a punishment. But we never imagined the severity of the punishment meted out. Stay classy Uruguay Which is exactly why, of course, the whole squad were proclaiming his innocence, saying the pictures were misleading etc in the build-up to the hearing... More faces than a pack of dice these fuckers!! Between this and the Dummett death threats thing, and the way all the media, public in the country seems to blindly swallow everything their paranoid FA says as gospel, I do wonder what sort of country Uruguay must be to live in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Don't forget this slimey mug http://i4.chroniclelive.co.uk/incoming/article6210134.ece/alternates/s615/Gus-Poyet-1.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts