huss9 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 if it is £60m it will include agents fees, signing on fees and wages. also it will increase the chances of an early pards sacking if we don't start well. saying all this, no way we going to spend anywhere near that. unofficial leaks by PR department. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 For a club that are so sly and conniving why would we announce that we have a large amount of money to spend? Load of bollocks and I seriously hope that no one believes it, you just know a load of bellends on Twitter etc will mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 the club believe they will be able to announce the first of several new signings in the next few days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 For a club that are so sly and conniving why would we announce that we have a large amount of money to spend? Load of bollocks and I seriously hope that no one believes it, you just know a load of bellends on Twitter etc will mind. It amazes me how people of all ages read something in a paper and then casually in conversation say "he's off to Liverpool" like it's a cast iron fact. It rarely is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 That article actually said 'more' than £60m Even more believable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'd rather we spent £20m and gave it to someone competent. Wouldn't it be Carr as usual though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 £60m would buy a lot of Dan Goslings. 60 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'd rather we spent £20m and gave it to someone competent. Wouldn't it be Carr as usual though? ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I reckon Ian's missed the point a touch there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'd rather we spent £20m and gave it to someone competent. Wouldn't it be Carr as usual though? It might be if we are trying to keep everyone confused. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 It's true like. Couldn't really give a shit who comes in because we've seen - time and time again - that those players tend to regress under this manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Soz, was just trying to get at the fact that Pardew wouldn't be the one spending the money exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I reckon Ian's missed the point a touch there. Nah, he's been banging this drum all evening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 It's true like. Couldn't really give a shit who comes in because we've seen - time and time again - that those players tend to regress under this manager. Should be a great start to the season though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Soz, was just trying to get at the fact that Pardew wouldn't Elbe the one spending the money exactly. Aye but he'd be the one coaching them and whatnot. Which I think was what KenDahl was getting at? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I reckon Ian's missed the point a touch there. Nah, he's been banging this drum all evening. Just honestly wondering why everyone thinks Pardew has strengthened his position in the transfer committee. Don't see any reason to believe it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 the club believe they will be able to announce the first of several new signings in the next few days So Colback and which other pieces of shit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'd rather we spent £20m and gave whoever it bought to someone competent at managing said players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Soz, was just trying to get at the fact that Pardew wouldn't Elbe the one spending the money exactly. Aye but he'd be the one coaching them and whatnot. Which I think was what KenDahl was getting at? Righto, that's true, still think it's better if Pardew has better players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I reckon Ian's missed the point a touch there. Nah, he's been banging this drum all evening. Just honestly wondering why everyone thinks Pardew has strengthened his position in the transfer committee. Don't see any reason to believe it. Whether he's being given the money or the players is an irrelevance. Giving him either one is a catastrophe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'd rather we spent £20m and gave whoever it bought to someone competent at managing said players. Cool, if he'd said that I would've got it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 It would surely cost £5m max to get rid of Pardew and his staff, would gladly take the hit on that and call it £55m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 £60m on transfers seems..........unlikely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Remy Cabella mentioned as well. what the fuck would be the point of that lad being here under Pardew? On the bench in no time, if he's lucky. Nowhere near enough tackling from him to be a forward under the turd we have "managing" the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 At least the protest had some impact haven't really. Did you read the quote. "Ashley was concerned with the protests" So yes, they did. "Did the bedsheets cover any of my ads? No? " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts