midds Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Confident there will be either zero or absolute minimal punishment if they've breached it. They're above their own rules, they simply don't apply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Charlton Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 More cartel to cartel transfers today with garnacho,Been loads recently.I didnt know Sterling played for Gooners until he was on the bench for them in the 1st leg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 I really thought they’d get their act together under INEOS but it’s somehow got worse. Long may it continue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PENKAAA Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Paully said: Rio Ferdinand's time has come! He'll be putting his hand in his pocket and doing his bit to help, no doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 What a fantastic read 😀 https://www.redcafe.net/threads/club-ownership-senior-management-team-talk.484569/page-79 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 28 minutes ago, RodneyCisse said: At the detriment of pissing off their fans more, it’s beautiful especially when they were part of the reason we’re stuck with having to do similar shit. Fans have zero problem with Rashford and Garnacho leaving, as long as it's a good price for Garnacho. They're two trouble makers in the squad. Thankfully they're PSR assets so it'll be two birds with one stone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 14 minutes ago, Ronson333 said: What a fantastic read 😀 https://www.redcafe.net/threads/club-ownership-senior-management-team-talk.484569/page-79 So, the penny dropped that Rat is just a front for the Glazers to use the club and a debt tool for them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Same thing could happen to us mind with Season Ticket prices, we've the richest owners in the world but because of PSR fans are being forced to foot the bill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) If the demand is there for tickets, all football owners are going to charge what they can get away with eventually. Edited January 23 by El Prontonise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 minutes ago, duo said: Same thing could happen to us mind with Season Ticket prices, we've the richest owners in the world but because of PSR fans are being forced to foot the bill. Least psr protects the fans, eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 50 minutes ago, Froggy said: Fans have zero problem with Rashford and Garnacho leaving, as long as it's a good price for Garnacho. They're two trouble makers in the squad. Thankfully they're PSR assets so it'll be two birds with one stone. There's not a club outside Saudi Arabia who could afford to buy Rashford with those wages and his recent performances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPL Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said: Only slight issue with that story is that PSR doesn’t apply to Man Utd They'll change the rules as soon as they realise Man Utd are actually fucked and can't just buy their way out of trouble again and again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poon Raccoon Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 So they’ve lost 305m over three years. Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed. Unbelievable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 16 minutes ago, Poon Raccoon said: So they’ve lost 305m over three years. Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed. Unbelievable. I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbee909 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 From Popbitch Dave Brailsford might have come to football off the back of a stellar sports guru career, feted by the media, but at Manchester Utd he's generally thought to be, well, a bit of a prat. No-one's quite sure what he's really there to do (apart from say "yes" to anything Sir Jim says) but he's taken to wandering around Old Trafford and Carrington sticking his nose into everything, explaining his appearance with the phrase: "I don't need to be here. I live in Monaco. I'm only here for you guys". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Enjoy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 32 minutes ago, Zero said: I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 37 minutes ago, gdm said: Enjoy So the fans now has to pay more to make up for the money they spent on the Anthonys, the Rashfords and the Sanchos. Edited January 23 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poon Raccoon Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 34 minutes ago, Froggy said: Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps. So why did most other clubs get only 1m ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Froggy said: Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps. No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Froggy said: Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps. Bullshit! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 hours ago, Froggy said: Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps. The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them. This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDog Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 48 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them. This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over Why on earth would the EPL not be transparent on covid allowances when there are dire consequences for failing PSR? I think I have my own answer. If it's secret and not published, that is an issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 5 hours ago, Poon Raccoon said: So why did most other clubs get only 1m ? They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/ 4 hours ago, Rod said: Bullshit! See above my friend. 4 hours ago, Whitley mag said: No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is. See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now