Manchester United

[Poon Raccoon]

So they’ve lost 305m over three years.

 

Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed.

 

Unbelievable.

[Zero]

16 minutes ago, Poon Raccoon said:

So they’ve lost 305m over three years.

 

Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed.

 

Unbelievable.

I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed

[elbee909]

From Popbitch 

Dave Brailsford might have come to football off the back of a stellar sports guru career, feted by the media, but at Manchester Utd he's generally thought to be, well, a bit of a prat.

 

No-one's quite sure what he's really there to do (apart from say "yes" to anything Sir Jim says) but he's taken to wandering around Old Trafford and Carrington sticking his nose into everything, explaining his appearance with the phrase:

 

"I don't need to be here. I live in Monaco. I'm only here for you guys".

[gdm]

Enjoy 

[Froggy]

32 minutes ago, Zero said:

I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

[Erikse]

37 minutes ago, gdm said:

Enjoy 

 

So the fans now has to pay more to make up for the money they spent on the Anthonys, the Rashfords and the Sanchos.

 

 

Edited 12 hours ago by Erikse

[Poon Raccoon]

34 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

So why did most other clubs get only 1m ?

[Whitley mag]

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is.

[Rod]

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

Bullshit!

[TheBrownBottle]

2 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them.  This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over

[McDog]

48 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them.  This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over

 

 

Why on earth would the EPL not be transparent on covid allowances when there are dire consequences for failing PSR?

I think I have my own answer. If it's secret and not published, that is an issue.

[Froggy]

5 hours ago, Poon Raccoon said:

So why did most other clubs get only 1m ?

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

4 hours ago, Rod said:

Bullshit!

 

See above my friend.

 

4 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is.

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

[KetsbaiaIsBald]

[Froggy]

Fairly accurate tbf.

[TaylorJ_01]

7 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. 

 

Spoiler

 

 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by TaylorJ_01

[Froggy]

 

[TaylorJ_01]

Sorry, was irrelevant but that picture is the funniest, most cursed thing I've ever seen

[bobbydazzla]

6 minutes ago, TaylorJ_01 said:

Sorry, was irrelevant but that picture is the funniest, most cursed thing I've ever seen

Does she have an OnlyFans account ?

 

Asking for a friend 

[Sima]

Shame Diallo has just signed that new deal, would have been a decent Almiron replacement.

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Sima

[Whitley mag]

5 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

 

See above my friend.

 

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

Like I said good accounting your lot clearly claimed for everything down to the last hot dog.

[Dokko]

3 hours ago, TaylorJ_01 said:

 

  Hide contents

 

 

 

 

 

Challenge accepted.

[madras]

5 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

 

See above my friend.

 

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

It's not explained at all and nor will it when AUP's are kept private. Any idea why that would be ?

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by madras

[Froggy]

25 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Like I said good accounting your lot clearly claimed for everything down to the last hot dog.

 

Of course, as did most other clubs.

[Lush Vlad]

4 hours ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: