Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

 

See above my friend.

 

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

Like I said good accounting your lot clearly claimed for everything down to the last hot dog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

 

See above my friend.

 

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

It's not explained at all and nor will it when AUP's are kept private. Any idea why that would be ?

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Like I said good accounting your lot clearly claimed for everything down to the last hot dog.

 

Of course, as did most other clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish someone with more motivation than me could make a supercut juxtaposing Rio's comments like "It's Ashley's club, he can do what he wants" and "If Benitez wants players, why doesn't he pay for them himself" with what he's saying now about the Glazers and Brexit Jim. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BlueStar said:

Wish someone with more motivation than me could make a supercut juxtaposing Rio'a comments like "It's Ashley's club, he can do what he wants" and "If Benitez wants players, why doesn't he pay for them himself" with what he's saying now about the Glazers and Brexit Jim. 

 

Be great if Rio was euthanised. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not against a regeneration project around Old Trafford as long as taxpayer money is not used to fund Man U’s stadium or if public funds are used for any residential or commercial development it should be carried out by unaffiliated developers who take the profit as allowing Man U to be the developer and take the profits would be wholly unfair and in effect a public subsidy to cheat psr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they get tax payer funding this farce will be too much to participate in, the stacked deck is bad enough but that would be openly taking the piss and telling you so

 

 

Edited by Wolfcastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Conjo said:

Literally says around Old Trafford. What's the fuss? :lol: 

Outside of London, Manchester has had huge amounts of government funding in the last 20-25 years, so the government can say that they invest in the North. Manchester is like a Northern London now. It is now in a position where any sort of development company would be willing to invest in a regeneration project without the government kicking starting it. On top of this, the regeneration project is being kick started by arguably the biggest and one of the richest football clubs in the country, arguably the world, with many investors being multimillionaire’s and billionaires.

The rest of the country gets no funding at all. Half a mile away from SJP you have the Gateshead flyover that is closed because it’s falling down, with the government refusing to give the council money to tear it down, and have rejected giving it funding twice in recent years so it could be taken down before it got to this state. The Tyne bridge is still awaiting its final pot of money to be approved to finish its refurbishment, which is at least 5 years overdue, again due to budget restraints imposed on local councils.

The Redheugh bridge they fear is going the same way as the Gateshead flyover, again no funding for it.

The grade 2 listed High level bridge is going to need a complete rebuild in the coming years, again it has lacked funding from central government.

 

Let’s see how fast the government are willing to give money to us to develop the Strawberry land when we announce our stadium developments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...