AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The Lee Charnley shortlist-making starter pack: http://s13.postimg.org/65lb1qjhj/Fotor_Created.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Seem to remember this as well. Did they manage to interview all 80 on the list then? That must have been a busy Monday morning. Not sure what that has to do with anything? There was a club statement that the search for the new head coach would take a back seat until the end of the season but the prep work meant it could be picked up and progressed from this point onwards. Now they're making it sound like they will have to start all over again. I'm not in the slightest bit surprised by this development btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. I have no doubts their work was basically talk to Garde 1/2 times, few informal chats with SMC and possibly a few agents whoring their men about to no avail. Basically our list was three men and we took the lazy option and thats it. Any 'work' done will be a scribbled page of various cheap blokes and charlatans and gardes offer of coming with his own people near the bottom/listed as PTO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. I have no doubts their work was basically talk to Garde 1/2 times, few informal chats with SMC and possibly a few agents whoring their men about to no avail. Basically our list was three men and we took the lazy option and thats it. Any 'work' done will be a scribbled page of various cheap blokes and charlatans and gardes offer of coming with his own people near the bottom/listed as PTO I was going to say Charnley's probably lost that piece of paper but then remembered he's a secretary. It's probably tucked away neatly in a filing cabinet ready for handy reference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 "Lee Charnley to draw up head coach shortlist after being handed full control of search" Shortlist, that's a canny idea. Wonder how long it took him to come up with that one. Full control? I thought Ashley claimed he doesn't make those decisions and has people to do that job for him. Lies, lies, lies, don't fall for his shit and don't renew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Sorry if Giggs: http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/who-lee-charnley-man-charge-6772955 That article tells you nothing...ive still not a clue who he is or what qualifies him to do the one of the most important jobs in the club. He's been doing his short list for our next manager for months now...whats the problem? Lost his pen? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Running our club or ruining our club…. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 I think it just proves that Carver, if not having the worst run ever, would originally be the manager next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nattfare Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 What an embarrasing and pathetic joke of a club this is with this guy in charge. Still even if he loses his job it will probably be the kit man who gets it next. So sick and tired of it and I wonder if I will even bother to follow the club at all next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 I never understood why Ashley would intrust people with zero experience to look after such an expensive asset. It is the ONE position you actually need someone who knows what they are doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bada Bing Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 So he can indirectly control every decision made at the club.. Mike's got him in his pocket & in that position for a reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Charnley is supposed to have been with the club for years, right? Even before Ashley, as I recall. That's a problem in and of itself. It certainly didn't afford him the chance to learn how to do things the right way. I have no clue how intelligent he is, but he's totally underwater. If Ashley truly had the intent to delegate the club to someone competent, he'd be looking for somebody coming up in a decently run club. Unfortunately, all indications are that he just doesn't give a fuck. Just sticks with the toadies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 Still no word on the Fan's Forum meeting that was "brought forward" following concerns raised by the fans?? Anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 One word…useless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Still no word on the Fan's Forum meeting that was "brought forward" following concerns raised by the fans?? Anyone? http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/06/latest-mike-ashley-and-lee-charnley-treat-nufc-fans-forum-with-contempt/ Basically since the day Liar stated the FF would be brought forward to before the end of the season the club has ignored all emails requesting info on when its going to happen This is the all new open and transparent NUFC people will continue to back and fund Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugoinufc Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Still no word on the Fan's Forum meeting that was "brought forward" following concerns raised by the fans?? Anyone? http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/06/latest-mike-ashley-and-lee-charnley-treat-nufc-fans-forum-with-contempt/ Basically since the day Liar stated the FF would be brought forward to before the end of the season the club has ignored all emails requesting info on when its going to happen This is the all new open and transparent NUFC people will continue to back and fund disgusting but as you would expect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Fuck this cowardly little chode. Pathetic excuse for a human being. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Absolute mess. What happened to walking away when you were destroying something through your inability to do your job? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 What is this arsehole's trade by profession originally? Is he an accountant or secretary? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Full time thumb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Changes to the board Head coach Steve McClaren, chief scout Graham Carr and club ambassador Bob Moncur have today been appointed to the Board, joining managing director Lee Charnley. Newcastle United has today (Wednesday, 10th June) announced changes to its Board of Directors Newcastle United has today (Wednesday, 10th June) announced changes to its Board of Directors. Head coach Steve McClaren, chief scout Graham Carr and club ambassador Bob Moncur have today been appointed to the Board, joining managing director Lee Charnley. Mike Ashley has relinquished his position on the board along with finance director John Irving, who is leaving the Club. Newcastle United becomes the only club in the Premier League to have its head coach on its Board of Directors, a move which the Club feels adds significant strength to it. Managing director Lee Charnley commented: "This is a very positive step forward for the Club and I am delighted that Steve, Graham and Bob will join me on the board. "It was particularly important for us that the head coach also became a board member in order to gain a full understanding and appreciation for the Club and its operations as a whole, not just the football side. In Steve we have an individual who embraced that responsibility. "Graham and Bob's passion for the Club is beyond question and I believe given the collective skills, knowledge and experience, together, we are incredibly strong. "Whilst, of course, we all have our individual primary duties, there is a huge common desire for the Club as a whole to move forward and succeed." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 So the club has no finance director in the same manner sports direct hasn't for the last 18 months. Never misses a trick Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now