Guest palnese Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Runs into the box, based on the last few games I watched. We had Gosling doing that, but he's awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Hes not as bad as some people make out on here like. Hardly a world beater but about our level now sadly. He offers nothing we don't already have though. Its like buying a spare, spare tyre. I I what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Hes not as bad as some people make out on here like. Hardly a world beater but about our level now sadly. He offers nothing we don't already have though. Its like buying a spare, spare tyre. I I what? -Robot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alyosha Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Hes not as bad as some people make out on here like. Hardly a world beater but about our level now sadly. That's the problem; he's starting at our level. Once Pardew gets him he'll be worse. Once you get to a critically low level of quality the Pardew effect is inversed. Ryan Taylor, Williamson, Perch, Best and the Ameobi brothers all showed improvement under Pardew's tutelage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 There is a lot of low expectations going with that. Williamson granted has proven better than believed and Best worked very well with Ba, but Ryan Taylor is only really good at one thing, Perch was never that great to be honest basically functional and Shola only improved in the sense that he got closer to death. Sammy has shown promise in spurts but no less sure he's not being held back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Runs into the box, based on the last few games I watched. We had Gosling doing that, but he's awful. If he does he's even worse than I thought, considering he's only scored about 4 goals in his career. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Shola only improved in the sense that he got closer to death Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-west-hams-bizarre-transfer-3672136 Newcastle were locked in an extraordinary row with Jack Colback’s representatives before his £50,000-a-week move to St James’ Park. Mirror Sport understands confirmation of the 24-year-old’s free-agent defection from arch-rivals Sunderland was held up for over two weeks - because he staged a u-turn and asked to be allowed to go to West Ham instead. The Magpies and Hammers had been in a straight fight for Colback’s services when it became clear that he was ready to quit the Stadium of Light. It appeared the battle had been won when Colback initially chose a move to his native Tyneside. It is understood, however, that the Toon were left stunned after being told the player had had an overnight change of heart - possibly sparked by concerns over the reaction on Wearside - and now wanted to move to the Upton Park club. A remarkable week of wrangling then ensued in which Colback’s representatives allegedly tried to backtrack - only to be told by Newcastle that they had already reached agreement and the club were not willing to go back on it. At one stage, they did offer to actually SELL Colback to West Ham for £5million. It was when the Hammers declined the audacious move that the player’s move to Newcastle was confirmed. Good lad. Always wanted to play for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 All this over Jack fucking Colback Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 What a fucking joke we are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-west-hams-bizarre-transfer-3672136 Newcastle were locked in an extraordinary row with Jack Colback’s representatives before his £50,000-a-week move to St James’ Park. Mirror Sport understands confirmation of the 24-year-old’s free-agent defection from arch-rivals Sunderland was held up for over two weeks - because he staged a u-turn and asked to be allowed to go to West Ham instead. The Magpies and Hammers had been in a straight fight for Colback’s services when it became clear that he was ready to quit the Stadium of Light. It appeared the battle had been won when Colback initially chose a move to his native Tyneside. It is understood, however, that the Toon were left stunned after being told the player had had an overnight change of heart - possibly sparked by concerns over the reaction on Wearside - and now wanted to move to the Upton Park club. A remarkable week of wrangling then ensued in which Colback’s representatives allegedly tried to backtrack - only to be told by Newcastle that they had already reached agreement and the club were not willing to go back on it. At one stage, they did offer to actually SELL Colback to West Ham for £5million. It was when the Hammers declined the audacious move that the player’s move to Newcastle was confirmed. Good lad. Always wanted to play for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Oh boy ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinport53 Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Only in Newcastle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 He cannot possibly be on £50k? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Prepared to sell before they have even played a game for us, that's a new low Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 He cannot possibly be on £50k? Not a chance. But let's all take the Mirror as gospel truth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Always wanted to play for us didn't he Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 In keeping with his cuntish personality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Remember all stuff this when he's kissing the badge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JS Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Remember all stuff this when he's kissing the badge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Pay this kid 50k yet we lose our shit over adding 500k to a 1M onto transfer fees. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 A 'Gosling replacement' on 50k per week. Just let that sink in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Can't see that being correct, it was reported he was on £6k per week at Sunderland so there's no way we would increase his wages that much. The fact he was on so little is probably at least 50% of the reason we wanted him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Can't see that being correct, it was reported he was on £6k per week at Sunderland so there's no way we would increase his wages that much. The fact he was on so little is probably at least 50% of the reason we wanted him. Well if it's not I'm sure we'll have another, not at all embarrassing or small time, statement from the club tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 There's a chunk of our 60 million "war chest" gone then.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now