Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

 

Any of them who give them access and stories get an easy ride. Note the lack of criticism for Allardyce, for example. Their production team is full of family members/friends of players/managers/ex-players. You are told in production meetings who can't be criticised/about whom criticism cannot be aired. They don't mind letting people question Wenger on air because, amongst other reasons, they think he never does anything for them above the bare contractual minimum. It's the same across so many of their departments - there are children of former England Cricket players in the Cricket production team, for example, because in return daddy tells the ECB to grant them first-rate access and first option on everything. It's a really despicable organisation to be frank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

 

Any of them who give them access and stories get an easy ride. Note the lack of criticism for Allardyce, for example. Their production team is full of family members/friends of players/managers/ex-players. You are told in production meetings who can't be criticised/about whom criticism cannot be aired. They don't mind letting people question Wenger on air because, amongst other reasons, they think he never does anything for them above the bare contractual minimum. It's the same across so many of their departments - there are children of former England Cricket players in the Cricket production team, for example, because in return daddy tells the ECB to grant them first-rate access and first option on everything. It's a really despicable organisation to be frank.

 

What a joke, void all integrity if that's legit. I don't doubt you either if i'm honest, it explains a lot in regard to Hippo head and Pardew.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

 

Any of them who give them access and stories get an easy ride. Note the lack of criticism for Allardyce, for example. Their production team is full of family members/friends of players/managers/ex-players. You are told in production meetings who can't be criticised/about whom criticism cannot be aired. They don't mind letting people question Wenger on air because, amongst other reasons, they think he never does anything for them above the bare contractual minimum. It's the same across so many of their departments - there are children of former England Cricket players in the Cricket production team, for example, because in return daddy tells the ECB to grant them first-rate access and first option on everything. It's a really despicable organisation to be frank.

 

What a joke, void all integrity if that's legit. I don't doubt you either if i'm honest, it explains a lot in regard to Hippo head and Pardew.

 

Makes sense why foreigners get so much stick. No nieces when your from Argentina.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

 

Any of them who give them access and stories get an easy ride. Note the lack of criticism for Allardyce, for example. Their production team is full of family members/friends of players/managers/ex-players. You are told in production meetings who can't be criticised/about whom criticism cannot be aired. They don't mind letting people question Wenger on air because, amongst other reasons, they think he never does anything for them above the bare contractual minimum. It's the same across so many of their departments - there are children of former England Cricket players in the Cricket production team, for example, because in return daddy tells the ECB to grant them first-rate access and first option on everything. It's a really despicable organisation to be frank.

 

What a joke, void all integrity if that's legit. I don't doubt you either if i'm honest, it explains a lot in regard to Hippo head and Pardew.

 

Makes sense why foreigners get so much stick. No nieces when your from Argentina.

 

Very true, it's awful stuff like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those 2 never get any flak on the BBC either.

 

I was just thinking that, i can kind of get my head around lumphead not getting any as he gets teams safe but not Pardew, he just lies along with everything else his shit teams produce and they all just ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Kammy and Ben Shepard just now, they were talking about Palace's bad run along with the guests. They came to the conclusion that it was because they didn't have a striker, and that's the reason for the bad run since last christmas. How does the c*** get away with it, no looking at his tactics, his style of play, his inept subs, his string of pathetic excuses. They didn't even mention his subs just before the corner at Spurs that cost the goal, even though they were shown in the highlights.

 

It's unbelieveable how it seems to be no fault of his at all.

 

His niece works for sky so he gives them a lot of soundbytes/access to players/for interviews etc. Their higher-ups are very clear about not criticising him.

 

Really ?

 

So pundits go against what they believe because of that (if they really think he's rubbish of course). That's just ridiculous if true.

 

Any of them who give them access and stories get an easy ride. Note the lack of criticism for Allardyce, for example. Their production team is full of family members/friends of players/managers/ex-players. You are told in production meetings who can't be criticised/about whom criticism cannot be aired. They don't mind letting people question Wenger on air because, amongst other reasons, they think he never does anything for them above the bare contractual minimum. It's the same across so many of their departments - there are children of former England Cricket players in the Cricket production team, for example, because in return daddy tells the ECB to grant them first-rate access and first option on everything. It's a really despicable organisation to be frank.

 

Makes perfect sense, tbh. The easy ride Pardew received was more difficult to stomach/theorise-over when the piss was being directly taken out of us; but looking at it now, from the benefit of being afar - there has to be something in it. No one ever has anything bad to say about him and yet he's objectively dispicable and a shite, shite manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

When he first came here there was American footage of an ex footballer calling Pardew out and everything he said what he would do to us came true, I cant remember who he was tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he first came here there was American footage of an ex footballer calling Pardew out and everything he said what he would do to us came true, I cant remember who he was tho.

 

Stewart Robson. Only time he's ever been right like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

When he first came here there was American footage of an ex footballer calling Pardew out and everything he said what he would do to us came true, I cant remember who he was tho.

 

Stewart Robson. Only time he's ever been right like.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.cpfc.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21

 

Pure sex reading the topics.

 

"Pardew has to go"

 

"The only club who hasn´t scored a goal" (hover over topic to see preview of content: "I´ve just perused the tables for premier, championship, League 1 and 2 and National Leauge. Only Palace have failed to score. Yet the.....". Can only imagine how it continues :lol:

 

"Any of this sound familiar?" (hover over topic again: "I know a lot won´t appreciate yet another Pardew thread, but here goes... For some reason yesterday i remembered a post a Newcastle fan made..."  :smitten:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine if they'd went on to win the cup final after his dance, I would have just given up on football completely. Delighted he's been found out for the fraud he is.

 

Still feel grubby celebrating that winner so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...