The Bonk Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 How fucking mental do you have to be? 6 years not enough? He's ruined this poor teenagers life and her family. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 #justiceforjohnson? What fucking justice?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I've been banned from commenting on that thread over on RTG. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? The latter, or she had a strange relationship with her father when she was young. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Forgive me for being naive but what the laws on dog bumming? Is it an offense? Is having pictures of it an offense? Did he break the law again or was the pooch just used to beef up the case? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I've been banned from commenting on that thread over on RTG. Why? Your input was being supported by many posters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Why? Your input was being supported by many posters. No idea, I can post on other threads but not that one. I guess someone didn't like what I was posting and I probably got reported probably due to being misquoted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots It's not something I've ever thought about, I mean why on earth would you go near a dogs arse? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Forgive me for being naive but what the laws on dog bumming? Is it an offense? Is having pictures of it an offense? Did he break the law again or was the pooch just used to beef up the case? Yes and yes. He probably wasn't charged with it because the gravity of the other offences meant they didn't need to. They were pretty much certain to be able to convict on the kissing/grooming given the Whatsapp messages and the admissions in interview. A conviction for possession of extreme porn wouldn't have added anything to the sentence so it will have been deemed not in the public interest to put the extra work into that charge. It doesn't mean he didn't have it - if he was arrested for it, he did have it, it's not exactly the sort of thing you can deny if it's found on your computer, other than dispute how it got there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots It's not something I've ever thought about, I mean why on earth would you go near a dogs arse? Tight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I don't want to waste time thinking about it but i'd having read your post Wullie I'm asking myself why you aren't arrested within minutes of downloading that shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 The judge asked how low he could get. He replied 'a chihuahua' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots It's not something I've ever thought about, I mean why on earth would you go near a dogs arse? Tight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 https://twitter.com/acampbell68/status/713112707990491137 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? A little from column A, a little from column B...... (*little = lot) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hog Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I really don't get fuckwits like Katie Hopkins, etc, I mean if 15 isn't a child in their eyes at what point do they draw the line? The age of consent is there for a reason and regardless of that Johnson is thirteen years older than the kid, what possible interest could a normal bloke of 28 have in a kid of 15?!!! Sick, dog-fucking, paedo bastard, any of these ass clowns supporting him should be fucking ashamed of themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phillipealbert Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? Definately the latter. She has made a lucrative career out of playing Devil's Advocate. She's not stupid, she's making a lot of money out of saying controversial things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Forgive me for being naive but what the laws on dog bumming? Is it an offense? Is having pictures of it an offense? Did he break the law again or was the pooch just used to beef up the case? Delima, is that you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Usurping Rolf Harris in every step. He really isn't, and if you don't believe be you should read the judge's sentencing remarks regarding Rolf. 6 years does seem a excessive sentence when you compare it to other cases involving very young children but I have no sympathy for him. I'd be happy if all sentencing for all nonces was increased massively. Johnson has came across as an arrogant tw@t in this trial. You should call yourself Strange Mackem. You try to appear even-handed on here but you come across as a smart arse who tries to deflect responsibility from the role your club played in this whole sorry affair and the true extent of what others apart from Byrne really knew when he was welcomed back into the club. Thousands (if not tens of thousands) of your fans sung in defence of Johnson and if Sunderland forums and social media are reflective then it is not a small minority who still support Johnson and blame the child. Your time would be better spent back on RTG - whatever you're called on there - addressing the weird opinions of your fellow Sunderland fans and the manner in which your club has behaved. I don't try and come over as even handed, I give my opinion, hopefully one which has been formed using facts. When I joined this forum I said I would interact on here as I do with my Newcastle supporting mates, I have quite a few, and not like some of the tossers you see at the matches or on internet forums. Obviously some people don't like it which to be honest doesn't surprise me. I've condemned the part played by Margaret Byrne (and therefore the club) and the PFA. I've condemned Johnson, and I've condemned the idiot fans who sang some of the more ludicrous songs in support of him. I've also condemned the idiots on Facebook and RTG, I have accounts on both. Most fans, like me, thought the reason Johnson was brought back from suspension was because he had provided evidence to the club and the PFA which proved his innocence. We were lied to. I feel no shame for that because I had no part in it. My last reply was in response to a poster who seemed to be saying that Johnson is worse than Rolf Harris. He isn't, and such statements come from complete ignorance and add absolutely nothing to the debate. If that makes me look like a 'smart arse' then tough sh*t It was an "Animal Hospital" based pun, clearly humour doesn't translate to Mackemdom . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Katie Hopkins definitely believes a lot of what she says though, she exagerates it in a brash manner but she will actually believe Johnson is just an 'idiot' and that 'Jihadis are allowed to roam the streets'. She has a proper complex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Katie Hopkins is Donald Trump with a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 The irony is, literally all of Katie Hopkins' 'fans' are the unemployed layabout professional mums she relentlessly maligns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts