Guest chopey Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 There isn't a single system or set of personnel in any area of the team that is proven to be able to function competently for even two consecutive games. There isn't any bizarre team selection going on. Just a bloke trying to reshuffle the deckchairs on the Titanic and only just realising that every single chair has something fundamentally wrong with it. http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rafa-benitez-cant-change-much-11136648 Wullie is Lee Ryder...nice use of Titanic That's very interesting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 There isn't a single system or set of personnel in any area of the team that is proven to be able to function competently for even two consecutive games. There isn't any bizarre team selection going on. Just a bloke trying to reshuffle the deckchairs on the Titanic and only just realising that every single chair has something fundamentally wrong with it. http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rafa-benitez-cant-change-much-11136648 Wullie is Lee Ryder...nice use of Titanic That's very interesting No fucking way is that a coincidence Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 There isn't a single system or set of personnel in any area of the team that is proven to be able to function competently for even two consecutive games. There isn't any bizarre team selection going on. Just a bloke trying to reshuffle the deckchairs on the Titanic and only just realising that every single chair has something fundamentally wrong with it. http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rafa-benitez-cant-change-much-11136648 Wullie is Lee Ryder...nice use of Titanic WTF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 What a scumbag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Hi Lee, you window licking thieving bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Hi, Lee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Quite a well used saying in football no? Wouldn't put theft beyond the doylum like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Hi, Lee. Hi? How about, Fuck you Lee Ryder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Which one is Wullie? My money is on ryder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 It explains a lot about Wullie's posts if he is Ryder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Wullie is hi Lee thought of on Newcastle Online. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 It's quite a common phrase like. Although he has blatantly taken it from here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Ryder's done that to me before too - basically lifted an entire blog post plugged on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Haven't posters in here made up bullshit transfer rumours, and he has printed them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 As if he's a beast capable of shame Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's quite a common phrase like. Although he has blatantly taken it from here. Doubt it, seeing as the usual phrase is "rearranging the deckchairs…" and the one on here was the metaphorically-confused "shuffling the deckchairs…". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's quite a common phrase like. Although he has blatantly taken it from here. Doubt it, seeing as the usual phrase is "rearranging the deckchairs…" and the one on here was the metaphorically-confused "shuffling the deckchairs…". "reshuffle: an act of reorganizing or rearranging something." I'm not having anyone suggest I'm in any way confused about something Lee Ryder isn't. 'Reshuffle' is fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's not flat out wrong like 'the proof is in the pudding' grrr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Ryder you fucking knob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's not flat out wrong like 'the proof is in the pudding' grrr. What's wrong with that like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" is the original expression I think (or something like that). That's the bastardised version. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" is the original expression I think (or something like that). That's the bastardised version. I know the origin. I don't think it's wrong per se - the shortened version is superior for today's modern world where we don't have 20 years for grandpa to finish a sentence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It doesn't make any sense though does it? It's like shortening 'that's opened a can of worms' to 'that's a worm' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 'Someone's let a cat out' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Who in the world said that one way of shorthanding an idiom/proverb/metaphor would apply globally? Answer: no one. Absolutely no one is confused by the meaning of the shorthanded version. The original applied to 14th century puddings where questionable meat standards were as likely to kill you as nourish you. By any first world standard the actual literal meaning is horribly outdated anyway. Language and usage evolves, chillax. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts