Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Refreshing to have someone who's actually able to think about problems and apply some brain power. Recent managers would just have gone back to Colback and stuck with Lascelles and Aarons, but he's knowledgable enough to think creatively. Not sure Gouff really worked but fair play for bold changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How was Gouff? Think that should send a message to the board.. we are 1 or 2 injuries from Gouff.

 

Deflected the ball to Hayden for the first, forced a save with a decent overhead effort and won the penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How was Gouff? Think that should send a message to the board.. we are 1 or 2 injuries from Gouff.

 

Deflected the ball to Hayden for the first, forced a save with a decent overhead effort and won the penalty.

 

He does have good movement, when he first arrived him and Sissoko were popping off some clever one-two's. Maybe that's what Rafa saw in him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refreshing to have someone who's actually able to think about problems and apply some brain power. Recent managers would just have gone back to Colback and stuck with Lascelles and Aarons, but he's knowledgable enough to think creatively. Not sure Gouff really worked but fair play for bold changes.

 

It's all that's ever been fucking needed and it feels great. Not beating your head against the wall listening to morons talk utter shit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought when bringing Lascalles on we'd go to three at the back and push the full backs right on as an experiment type thing. Nope it was a flat back 5....then Colback. Too cautious, lets get after games and teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought when bringing Lascalles on we'd go to three at the back and push the full backs right on as an experiment type thing. Nope it was a flat back 5....then Colback. Too cautious, lets get after games and teams.

 

I can see why he did it. We just needed to win today and get some points on the board. How we did it was irrelevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought when bringing Lascalles on we'd go to three at the back and push the full backs right on as an experiment type thing. Nope it was a flat back 5....then Colback. Too cautious, lets get after games and teams.

 

We scored a goal after the changes man :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought when bringing Lascalles on we'd go to three at the back and push the full backs right on as an experiment type thing. Nope it was a flat back 5....then Colback. Too cautious, lets get after games and teams.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shutting the game down is a much better idea against Championship teams with little attacking fret. They don't have the ability to apply the same kind of pressure as better sides. I wouldn't want to see it every time but we really needed to just get the points bagged last night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shutting the game down is a much better idea against Championship teams with little attacking fret. They don't have the ability to apply the same kind of pressure as better sides. I wouldn't want to see it every time but we really needed to just get the points bagged last night.

we've also got a defence that gifts goals to the opposition due to the smallest bit of pressure.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did it look at all likely that we would concede after those changes?

 

No

 

We didn't look like conceding before the changes either. The changes allowed Reading further up the pitch and more possession. We gave the ball away too easily and Dummett headed behind for a corner under no pressure at all. We need better footballers if we are to go that defensive.

 

I'd have taken Shelvey off, his work rate was better but after he hit that pass that led to the free kick for the 1st goal he again wasted the ball and possession by trying far too many 40 yard passes from the middle of his own half. I really do hope that we can replace him for a CM who can go past a man and carry the ball. I can see he's been praised by some but I don't see it. He's in a vital position and he's not what we need there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading had a lot of the ball and were winning lots of corners for the 5 or 10 minutes prior to Lascelles coming on anyway; his introduction just meant we had an extra body in there to clear our lines, as Perez looked shagged by that point anyway and wasn't going to contribute much else.

 

I questioned it a bit at the time but it was a decent sub.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did it look at all likely that we would concede after those changes?

 

No

 

Great question Yorkie, and good to hear hindutimes.

 

The nitpicking on here is hilarious :lol: we needed to preserve our first 3 points in this league more than ANYTHING else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how Rafa is a bog fan of squad rotation. Clark was hit and miss yesterday, but that run out will have done him the world of good. It keeps players on their toes as well when they know that a drop in standards is going to see them benched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how Rafa is a bog fan of squad rotation. Clark was hit and miss yesterday, but that run out will have done him the world of good. It keeps players on their toes as well when they know that a drop in standards is going to see them benched.

 

Hopefully Lascelles will up his game after being dropped yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully Benitez settles a back 4 soon. Three games, three different CB pairings. Argueably the position that profits the most from stability. Hopefully within a couple of games he has made a decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...