Doctor Zaius Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 He looks very slow and languid. Doesnt seem to be particularly incisive in anything that he does either. Tbf, at the very least, a player like that will take time to adjust. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 I just don't get the feel Paqueta wanted to go there at all and his bad start has just continued as their form has been patchy. He was very clearly presented to a lot of clubs and only one wanted to take the punt - can't have been too great for his confidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Soooo Diaz is now a bench player? (When he returns?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbee909 Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 But 'Liverpool have a ceiling' don't they Mr. Klopp. Poor Klopp. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Have to admit that they are good at getting deals done. Don't usually take too long it seems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 8 hours ago, RodneyCisse said: Man U will be gutted about Liverpool getting their man. Liverpool signed Garnacho? We had personal terms agreed with Gakpo for almost a year. Garnacho's emergence plus Ronaldo's departure has just put all eyes on a centre forward. We already have Rashford, Sancho and Garnacho for the left hand side. Spending £37-50m on another left sided forward would have been a bit mental. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Froggy copium is my favourite copium Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 6 minutes ago, Froggy said: Liverpool signed Garnacho? We had personal terms agreed with Gakpo for almost a year. Garnacho's emergence plus Ronaldo's departure has just put all eyes on a centre forward. We already have Rashford, Sancho and Garnacho for the left hand side. Spending £37-50m on another left sided forward would have been a bit mental. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 20 minutes ago, gbandit said: Froggy copium is my favourite copium I speak nothing but truth. Had we went and spent money on Gakpo the same people would have been saying how it's silly when we have so many wingers already. Infact I'm sure I've already seen that on here. NO's fickleness is my favourite fickleness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 1 minute ago, Froggy said: I speak nothing but truth. Had we went and spent money on Gakpo the same people would have been saying how it's silly when we have so many wingers already. Infact I'm sure I've already seen that on here. NO's fickleness is my favourite fickleness. You are absolutely correct about this. However, this doesn't change that you were after Gakpo but failed, most likely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Ikon said: You are absolutely correct about this. However, this doesn't change that you were after Gakpo but failed, most likely. I'd say based on what the likes of Romano have said, we have passed on him. Whether that's ETH changing his mind as Garnacho has come through or the Glazer's not sanctioning it, who knows? But signing Gakpo would have ruined Garnacho straight away. Rashford, Sancho and Garnacho is plenty for one position. I still think £80m on Antony was nuts when Gakpo was available for half the price, but at the same time we were crying out for a left sided winger. Centre forward is top priority by a million miles atm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 I forgot they had the second coming of Januzaj now on the left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Hope this is true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 They can't keep throwing money on transfers and hope it sticks. Ridiculous amount spent the last 5 or so seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonsays Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 2 hours ago, RodneyCisse said: I forgot they had the second coming of Januzaj now on the left. Wasn't long ago they were saying similar about Elanga. What's happened to him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 21 minutes ago, simonsays said: Wasn't long ago they were saying similar about Elanga. What's happened to him? Following the well trodden “Darren Gibson Trail” from Old Trafford to Goodison according to the papers this morning. Next stop Sunderland and ploughing into a row of parked cars at 6am whilst pissed out his brain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 (edited) The duality of man (united) Are we talking specifically about the Glazer's? Then Man United's activity in the transfer market is unforgivably, calamitously bad and Newcastle fans who experienced Ashley should know better than to simplify and downplay it. Or are we just talking about Man United in general, even though they're owned by the Glazers? Then Man United's activity in the transfer market is unquestionably perfect and every move or non-move is deliberate and from a loftier position in the food chain. Edited December 27, 2022 by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 2 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said: They can't keep throwing money on transfers and hope it sticks. Ridiculous amount spent the last 5 or so seasons. https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985 Jesus keep scrolling on this. The outlay compared to the income is ridiculous. They buy players at ridiculous prices then sell them on at huge losses, in some cases it's not been the players fault, they've just regressed from going there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 51 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: The duality of man (united) Are we talking specifically about the Glazer's? Then Man United's activity in the transfer market is unforgivably, calamitously bad and Newcastle fans who experienced Ashley should know better than to simplify and downplay it. Or are we just talking about Man United in general, even though they're owned by the Glazers? Then Man United's activity in the transfer market is unquestionably perfect and every move or non-move is deliberate and from a loftier position in the food chain. The thing is, they often do compete in the transfer market. They often get the players they want and they do pay the money needed to bring them in. They have often been bad buys, either not good enough, don’t have the right attitude, or doesn’t fit in with the manager and his style. It’s not a whole, the Glaziers don’t get us competing argument they like to band on about. You can call them out on having the right managers, people running the club, lack of infrastructure etc, but the money for the playing squad is there and the commercial side of the club is a roaring success. Although they overlap on a lot of things in regards to poor running of a football club, the Glaziers and Ashley are not the same as the argument people like to make it out as. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Man United’a transfer policy has been marked by buying players with either no plan on how they will be utilised or that don’t fit into how the team plays. Most of these have been made with commercial interests in mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 28 minutes ago, mighty__mag said: https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985 Jesus keep scrolling on this. The outlay compared to the income is ridiculous. They buy players at ridiculous prices then sell them on at huge losses, in some cases it's not been the players fault, they've just regressed from going there. That's mad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 At least I can agree with @Froggyin my hate for the Glazers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 31 minutes ago, mighty__mag said: https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985 Jesus keep scrolling on this. The outlay compared to the income is ridiculous. They buy players at ridiculous prices then sell them on at huge losses, in some cases it's not been the players fault, they've just regressed from going there. Oil money is ruining the game and distorting the transfer market though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 53 minutes ago, Kimbo said: Oil money is ruining the game and distorting the transfer market though. Yes I blame oil money for buying Fred at 60m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now