Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shelvey before Longstaff needs to be resolved much more urgently, as well as both fullback positions, central defence, cover for Wilson. There's a lot of others to worry about before this chap if he can keep up the level he played at tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Heron said:

Nah, he was just covering Shelvey's lack of athleticism and ASMs lack of defensive work in our half. 

Shelvey grafted his nuts off there like. Anar he's not the quickest or most agile but him and Joelinton put some hard yards in there

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Alan Pardew said:

Willock has been shocking all season but comparing these two is pointless anyway. Willock is a CAM who doesn't fit into Howe's system while Longstaff is a much more traditional CM/CDM. Problem is he doesn't have the stamina or physique to play this role. He was completely useless in the last 15 minutes tonight again.

I can take certain criticisms of Longstaff but not lack of stamina like? I'm sure he runs the most in the team or something daft, his pressure got us the goal tonight and he did a lot of the defensive work his team mates were incapable or unwilling to do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jack j said:

Shelvey grafted his nuts off there like. Anar he's not the quickest or most agile but him and Joelinton put some hard yards in there

That's not a criticism of Shelvey's efforts. He's seemingly fitter and/or more willing than he has been for a long time because of the way he's been man managed. However, athleticism isn't his strong point and nor has it ever been. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce absolutely wrecked his progress, but he looked solid today, hopefully he can find some of that Rafa form in the second half of the season. There's definitely a better player in there than the last 2 years have shown, he just needs pointing in the right direction. Ideally the midfield is replaced in January but he may have a part to play and hopefully he keeps improving again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Heron said:

That's not a criticism of Shelvey's efforts. He's seemingly fitter and/or more willing than he has been for a long time because of the way he's been man managed. However, athleticism isn't his strong point and nor has it ever been. 

 

Agree with this, and I've been one of Shelvey's biggest critics for a while. He's nowhere near the weak link he once was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

I actually didn't think he was great, he was at the minimum level required today, which is better than he's been. His positional play and decision making still isn't of the required standard.

His pass for the first goal was very assertive. 99% of the time a player in our shirt takes one touch too many before making the pass, and thus nullifying the chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ManDoon said:

Guy runs in treacle though, not his fault obvs but he’s so slow 

I see him has being a Siem de Jong type but obviously in a lesser way like. Playing in the pockets and closing down opposition in the final third.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Lenny said:

His pass for the first goal was very assertive. 99% of the time a player in our shirt takes one touch too many before making the pass, and thus nullifying the chance.

 

He made a correct decision, whoop de doo.

 

He's a better cricketer than he is a footballer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

He made a correct decision, whoop de doo.

 

He's a better cricketer than he is a footballer.

You literally questioned his decision making in your post, hence me raising the point that his decision making was spot on at a critical time in the game.

 

He should be sacked off at the earliest opportunity based on his last few years with us, but there was nothing wrong with his decision making and positional play today, and he was better than "minimum level required".

 

 

 

Edited by Lenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lenny said:

Also well done for him for putting that interviewer in his place regarding Joelinton. Amusing comment at face value but actually extremely disrespectful and unprofessional comment to make.

Aye, I thought it was good because I enjoyed the honesty of it, not enough of that nowadays, but likewise Longstaff was excellent to basically say "We've got his back and he'll show you". Was good leadership and fantastic to see. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Hanshithispantz said:

Think people are being a bit harsh on the interviewer like[emoji38]

 

It was obviously meant as a compliment. Joelinton has widely been regarded as one of the worst players in the league so he was just expressing his suprise, like the rest of us, that he's actually fucking amazing.

 

Not really that much of a compliment, saying you're good now but you were shite, not sure an interviewer should be coming out with things like that. Plenty of players have turned things around and I don't recall an interviewer doing that 

 

I do think he was trying to be funny but it's shit craic really

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...