Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Back in January there was an article at the Athletic titled “Liverpool Need the Next Wijnaldum” that has some really interesting things to say about Joe Willock. Makes sense that Klopp is an admirer.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.eb3278d526f39a4061ae7af2053ce089.jpeg

 

 

Edited by gazza ladra

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gazza ladra said:

Back in January there was an article at the Athletic titled “Liverpool Need the Next Wijnaldum” that has some really interesting things to say about Joe Willock. Makes sense that Klopp is an admirer.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.eb3278d526f39a4061ae7af2053ce089.jpeg

 

 

 

Anything similar available for Longstaff? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Anything similar available for Longstaff? 

Nah, it’s from an article for Liverpool supporters that addresses their needs.
 

The two players they identified that most closely matched  Winjaldum were Pedri and Willock. They expanded the the search to include more distant matches and came up with Nicollo Barella, Azzedine Ounahi, and Salis Abdul Samed.

Quote

 

Willock is above average, although not to the same level as Wijnaldum, at retaining the ball (64 out of 99) and frequently plays shorter passes to link play (72 out of 99), while he has a high tendency of carrying the ball (carry and dribble volume, 93 out of 99).

 

The 24-year-old’s defensive intensity (73 out of 99) is the opposite to Wijnaldum and while he is not as effective as the Netherlands international, Willock is still slightly above average in his defensive impact (52 out of 99).

 

The big difference between the two players is the attacking output. While Wijnaldum ranked highly in receptions in the opposition box (76 out of 99), he is below average in the other three attacking categories. Willock scores extremely highly in every category from receptions in the box often (96 out of 99), to shooting often (shot volume, 95 out of 99). He provides creativity both from ball progression (85 out of 99) and contribution towards his team’s chances (xG from shot creation, 93 out of 99).

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willock with clinical end product is a £60m + player. Willock at the moment is probably worth exactly what we paid for him.

Personally, I think he’s too old to develop much more beyond where he is now but I’d love to be proven wrong. He’s a great squad member and does a lot of hard work but we need better if we’re aiming for the top honours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can’t remember those goals he scored to keep us up, did he put his laces through any and strike them cleanly or was it side footers etc? He’s got quite nice technique at placement but when he tries to put his foot through it, it all goes wrong 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

Willock with clinical end product is a £60m + player. Willock at the moment is probably worth exactly what we paid for him.

Personally, I think he’s too old to develop much more beyond where he is now but I’d love to be proven wrong. He’s a great squad member and does a lot of hard work but we need better if we’re aiming for the top honours.

If Gordon is up to 50m with his stats Wilock is at least the same. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

If Gordon is up to 50m with his stats Wilock is at least the same. 

Gordon scores and creates goals. That's my whole point. Willock does the hard work and then more often than not, fails to finish it off with something meaningful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

Gordon scores and creates goals. That's my whole point. Willock does the hard work and then more often than not, fails to finish it off with something meaningful.

Willock has more goal involvements than Gordon though 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RodneyCisse said:

Willock last night when he just opened up and put on the burners couldn’t be played against. 
 

Shame he couldn’t keep his head over the ball twice.

The same can be said for Adama Traore in every game he's ever played

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to whatever site i've just looked at, Willock has 2 goals and 2 assists this season, in a team challenging for Champions League places.

Gordon has 3 goals and 0 assists in a team rooted to the bottom of the table. It's hardly chasm between them.  All of Willock's stats are skewed by that one purple patch he had when he first joined the club.

And if you take it purely on stats, you ignore all of the things he didn't do when he should've, like score two goals last night and bag an assist as well (the things you see with your eyes). Stats only explain part of the picture. If Willock added end product to his game, he'd finish every season with goals and stats in double figures. There's a reason he doesn't.

 

I should add that I don't dislike Willock by the way, we just need better. We also have a guy sat on the bench who terrifies defenders and will get double figures if he's ever allowed to start.

 

 

Edited by Holmesy

Link to post
Share on other sites

He always has some really nice touches every game. You can see how much confidence he has with his pace to best people on the wing now and he’s improving with his passing. I feel like he’s getting closer all the time to being a really good player. The only thing is whether he can stay focused and on it for the whole match game after game, he’s probably one of the less consistent members of the team 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...