Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is literally nobody there to make the decision, I believe that's the issue. Once we have a DoF, Sporting Director or whatever on board I think we'll see things move pretty quickly.

 

No point in bring Lampard or whoever in if the Director fucking despises them or they have totally different ideas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HaydnNUFC said:

 

Sacking this one isn't, it's a no brainer. Atmosphere may well have improved but I'm still thinking that this fat bell end is going to take us down.

Didn't say it wasn't an easy decision, said it was a big decision. They're not mutually exclusive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that's the case and he does (hopefully) leave before Sunday, surely that gives off a worse impression by new owners with regards to a PR win? 

 

Personally hope he's canned a minute before kick off but it probably looks a bit shitty to string the bloke along all week. No sympathy at all by the way, just if PR was considered in any way, taking him till later in the week, albeit hilarious for us, just gives Bruce's media pals a stick to beat them with imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He can’t be here come Sunday, we could win 5-0 and there’d be still, rightfully, be Bruce Out songs. The first half last home game was a barrage of abuse towards him. It was great. We simply can’t have new owners attending their first game with a wall of noise against the manager.

 

Pay him up and send him on his way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Mood darkens around St James' Park with lack of clarity over Steve Bruce's future

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund understood to be confused as to why Newcastle would sack Steve Bruce with no replacement lined up

 

ByLuke Edwards13 October 2021 • 7:00pm

 

Steve Bruce took training for a second successive day after holding a meeting with Newcastle United’s new owners as morale among staff and players began to be affected by the growing uncertainty.

Bruce had been expected to be sacked when he met the two most prominent members of the consortium, Amanda Staveley and her husband Mehrdad Ghodoussi, on Monday.

 

But instead of removing him from a position he has held since July 2019 they asked him for his thoughts about the squad and talked about their plans for the future.

 

Telegraph Sport understands there was no firm decision taken on whether to replace him as manager before or during that meeting, with Bruce informed he would hear from them again within the next 24 hours.

 

That call has not been made as the consortium are waiting for an answer as to whether to sack Bruce or keep him in place for the Tottenham Hotspur game on Sunday, which would be the former Manchester United captain’s 1,000th as a manager.

 

Worryingly, training ground sources have said the mood has darkened in the last couple of days, with coaches fearing they are about to lose their jobs and players lacking focus because of the lack of clarity.

Both players and staff are taking a day off on Thursday and that surely represents the moment to reveal whether Bruce is going to stay on or not. 
 

Sources close to consortium members continue to insist that a change of manager will be made before the weekend, but the power lies with chairman Yasir Al-Rumayyan and he will make that call, not those based in the UK.

 

It is understood there has been some confusion within Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund as to why they would make a change in manager when they do not have a replacement lined up.

Bruce was thanked for keeping the club in the Premier League under difficult circumstances during the meeting on Monday and it is believed that was a message the Saudis were particularly keen to convey. 

 

Although all the indicators up to this point have been that Bruce will lose his job it is not beyond the realms of possibility that he will be asked to stay on for the time being – at least until the new owners have found someone to replace him.

 

Meanwhile, in a positive looking move, Newcastle are understood to have made contact with Brian Marwood about taking up a position at St James’ Park. The 61-year-old played a key role in the transformation of Manchester City where he is currently managing director of global football for the whole City network of clubs.

It is not known whether Marwood would like a new challenge but he is from the North East and his family still live in the area.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...