Shearergol Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/club-statement-1/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/club-statement-1/ Cheers. Doubt it's relevant at all but I just wondered if the statement containing the allegation was still out there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishMagpie Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 I vote we rename the site wildextrapolationsfromverylimiteddata-online.org Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If, even as top top lawdogs, they have reviewed the entirety of the materials/sale/etc in 36 hours and come to that conclusion that quickly then we should expect to see NUFCs internal counsel let go for gross incompetence as well. Reaching new lows of Doomering on here. Is there a card where the twitter echo chamber is the opponentminion and the doomerang comes back to hit forum members directly on the temple? BlueStar[/member]? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 I vote we rename the site wildextrapolationsfromverylimiteddata-online.org seconded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 Be very interesting to see how this plays out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 Ah the old "I don't remember" defence. It can't be disproved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 'Fuck nas your onna' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 If he gets found guilty can the PL rip up the bein contract? Could see a way for SA to acquire the tv rights and the PL to wave thru the takeover Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 Would that not just be a similar type of corruption though? except it would benefit us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 Well obv bid for the new rights I mean. They did recently start a new media company did they not ? Probably just silly aloud thinking by me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 If he gets found guilty can the PL rip up the bein contract? Could see a way for SA to acquire the tv rights and the PL to wave thru the takeover Are you saying MMA's tweet about TV rights may have some legs? I know this is not relevant to the takeover, but how mental is the this whole debacle? Amazon and the likes have wasted opportunities to film an actual basket case of a football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 I've always thought it was 'Voodoo Chile'. You would be correct. There's a first Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 If he gets found guilty can the PL rip up the bein contract? Could see a way for SA to acquire the tv rights and the PL to wave thru the takeover Are you saying MMA's tweet about TV rights may have some legs? I know this is not relevant to the takeover, but how mental is the this whole debacle? Amazon and the likes have wasted opportunities to film an actual basket case of a football club. Imagine actually watching Charnley in action. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 18, 2020 Share Posted September 18, 2020 I've always thought it was 'Voodoo Chile'. You would be correct. There's a first But he pronounces it "chilli" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 This is the "quietest" this thread has been for a very long time. This is good, very good. Things are all happening quietly behind the scenes, as they have been for quite a long while now (and always should have been) but additionally we now know for a fact that some of the current behind-the-scenes activity is now LEGAL stuff. All we have to do now is w a i t . . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Did anyone (of any significance) ever comment on the article being removed from the lawyers site? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Not on this site mate, they don't exist. Elsewhere, no dont think so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 The lawyer they have on Gallowgate shots didn’t have an official reason but she said something about how our fans were harassing the guy’s personal social media posts asking for information about the takeover so they may have removed it to proceed with things quietly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 As valid an opinion as anyone's I suppose, but sounds pretty plausible tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealios Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Lawyers typically cannot advertise they are acting for a client without specific consent, regulatory duty of confidentiality and all that. The only way that statement was put up was with Mike Ashley's say so, so it had to be a deliberate attempt to put some more pressure on the Premier League, create a bit of press activity, and then remove the statement. Job done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 The lawyer they have on Gallowgate shots didn’t have an official reason but she said something about how our fans were harassing the guy’s personal social media posts asking for information about the takeover so they may have removed it to proceed with things quietly. The QC still has the original announcement on his Twitter, so I have my doubts on that theory Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Hes just bought an apartment just a long the road from me. Will try and track him down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 For the doom mongers on here, they’re still working on case. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-takeover-blackstone-chambers-18960490 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Our fans are so cringeworthy sometimes. Harassing a solicitors for information man, get a grip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts