gdm Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 What a snivelling twat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 PIF obviously want the takeover to happen as soon as possible hence the turning of the screw. The PL want to delay as much as possible as per the old saying, 'why do today if tomorrow will improve the odds'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 There are some right nuggets in the fan base like. Embarrassing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) We need to start passing our books around. Edited July 5, 2021 by Dr.Spaceman Craic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Fucking hell, that’s rich coming from Chump Edwards about the proposed takeover doing strange things to people. It’s made him go full out weird cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Twitter ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Social media is the tool of the devil. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejeck Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Luke wants to kiss Tracey's boobies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 The joys, it’s been moved back again (only a week this time, but Christ they are experts at the old can kicking) https://www.catribunal.org.uk/cases/14025721-st-james-holdings-limited Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Staveley might have wanted to check she was contacting the right person if she was doing it so publicly Tracey was more of a Cc jobby Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlymouthGeordie Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 PL have been granted more time to challenge jurisdiction of the CAT case. Which also confirms Liam Kennedy was guessing when he released that article saying their challenge had been rejected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Just now, Hhtoon said: Staveley might have wanted to check she was contacting the right person if she was doing it so publicly Tracey was more of a Cc jobby I’d bet the letters went to them all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 37 minutes ago, nbthree3 said: Again, which begs the question...why did Staveley and co write to her? Surely De Marco and co were behind it too? It can only have been about raising the profile of the case and a spot of posturing before it starts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 1 minute ago, PlymouthGeordie said: PL have been granted more time to challenge jurisdiction of the CAT case. Which also confirms Liam Kennedy was guessing when he released that article saying their challenge had been rejected. Where is this info from ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlymouthGeordie Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Just now, Slim said: Where is this info from ? CAT website. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Poor James has not really understood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenrot Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, Slim said: Where is this info from ? “I am satisfied that the requested short extension of seven days will not prejudice the listing of the hearing of the Jurisdiction Application and is reasonable given the concurrent demands on the Defendant in preparing for the arbitration proceedings.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Yeah that guy... he writes some interesting books? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I thought that they had to submit by June 25th? So that is an extension of 17 days? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I think it's just the reply to Ashley they're seeking an extension for. "AND UPON the Claimant filing its evidence in response to the Jurisdiction Application on 28 June 2021 AND UPON the Defendant’s application by letter dated 30 June 2021 requesting a extension of time for the filing and service of its evidence in reply" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Rosenrot said: “I am satisfied that the requested short extension of seven days will not prejudice the listing of the hearing of the Jurisdiction Application and is reasonable given the concurrent demands on the Defendant in preparing for the arbitration proceedings.” I thought the judge was deciding on whether to have a public hearing or a private hearing? Now we find out the PL still haven't even filed their evidence to have it thrown out. Ffs Edited July 5, 2021 by Scoot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I dont get it. They filed their evidence on June 28th. Then asked for another extension for the "filing and service" of its evidence on June 30th. What the hell does that even mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 1 hour ago, veriaqa said: This is my view too. Because they know they can't depend on the jury to be fair. Because they all are corrupt. Shut up veriaqa Basing your view of the British legal system on a comment made on this board and constantly repeating it is next level dullness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Yes so the jurisdiction issue hasn’t even been heard yet. That sort of conflicts with the club statement that said they were trying to move it behind closed doors? If that statement was written or at least approved by their legal team, you’d have to worry about the rest of the case ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts