Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 37 minutes ago, nbthree3 said: Again, which begs the question...why did Staveley and co write to her? Surely De Marco and co were behind it too? It can only have been about raising the profile of the case and a spot of posturing before it starts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 1 minute ago, PlymouthGeordie said: PL have been granted more time to challenge jurisdiction of the CAT case. Which also confirms Liam Kennedy was guessing when he released that article saying their challenge had been rejected. Where is this info from ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlymouthGeordie Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Just now, Slim said: Where is this info from ? CAT website. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Poor James has not really understood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenrot Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, Slim said: Where is this info from ? “I am satisfied that the requested short extension of seven days will not prejudice the listing of the hearing of the Jurisdiction Application and is reasonable given the concurrent demands on the Defendant in preparing for the arbitration proceedings.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Yeah that guy... he writes some interesting books? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I thought that they had to submit by June 25th? So that is an extension of 17 days? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I think it's just the reply to Ashley they're seeking an extension for. "AND UPON the Claimant filing its evidence in response to the Jurisdiction Application on 28 June 2021 AND UPON the Defendant’s application by letter dated 30 June 2021 requesting a extension of time for the filing and service of its evidence in reply" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Rosenrot said: “I am satisfied that the requested short extension of seven days will not prejudice the listing of the hearing of the Jurisdiction Application and is reasonable given the concurrent demands on the Defendant in preparing for the arbitration proceedings.” I thought the judge was deciding on whether to have a public hearing or a private hearing? Now we find out the PL still haven't even filed their evidence to have it thrown out. Ffs Edited July 5, 2021 by Scoot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I dont get it. They filed their evidence on June 28th. Then asked for another extension for the "filing and service" of its evidence on June 30th. What the hell does that even mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 1 hour ago, veriaqa said: This is my view too. Because they know they can't depend on the jury to be fair. Because they all are corrupt. Shut up veriaqa Basing your view of the British legal system on a comment made on this board and constantly repeating it is next level dullness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Yes so the jurisdiction issue hasn’t even been heard yet. That sort of conflicts with the club statement that said they were trying to move it behind closed doors? If that statement was written or at least approved by their legal team, you’d have to worry about the rest of the case ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 7 minutes ago, Wandy said: I dont get it. They filed their evidence on June 28th. Then asked for another extension for the "filing and service" of its evidence on June 30th. What the hell does that even mean? How do we know they filed their evidence? Because a journo posted it on Twitter? If this process has taught us anything is that they know fuck all when it comes to this. The only difference between them and us is that they are getting paid to speculate on all this bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 9 minutes ago, Wandy said: I dont get it. They filed their evidence on June 28th. Then asked for another extension for the "filing and service" of its evidence on June 30th. What the hell does that even mean? PL filed its application on the 11th. St James Holdings filed its response to the PL's application on the 28th. PL has received an extension of time to reply to St James Holdings' response. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said: How do we know they filed their evidence? Because a journo posted it on Twitter? If this process has taught us anything is that they know fuck all when it comes to this. The only difference between them and us is that they are getting paid to speculate on all this bollocks "AND UPON the Claimant filing its evidence in response to the Jurisdiction Application on 28 June 2021" That's what it says in the update. Edited July 5, 2021 by Wandy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Wandy said: "AND UPON the Claimant filing its evidence in response to the Jurisdiction Application on 28 June 2021" That's what it says in the update. Claimant or defendant? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 St James Holdings is claimant PL is defendant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I just don't fucking understand any of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Just now, Scoot said: I just don't fucking understand any of it The delay makes sense. Newcastle sent evidence against the PL having it overturned. The PL now get extra time to submit their own evidence in reply to that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 3 minutes ago, B-more Mag said: St James Holdings is claimant PL is defendant So the PL didnt actually meet the deadline of the 28th did they? They applied for an extension two days late. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 More returns than Wimbledon. This could and probably will go on forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 So what the hell did NUFC send on the 28th? The levels of farce just keep getting stronger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 More delays. Love it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 We submitted evidence contesting the Premier League's jurisdiction claim. The Premier League would usually have 1 week to reply but they wanted an additional week which they've been given to respond to Ashley's counterclaim. Both claims get heard at a hearing later Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 I'll be honest I can understand why Mashley and Staveley are going public again. I know there is a process, and I'm sure this is just how they play out, but it's just ridiculous really isn't it? All this for a takeover, of which the PL seemingly acted out of the norm and yet us the fans, potentially the city, are being dicked about something rotten. Club is at a crossroads and if this doesn't happen, I'd imagine that life support can be turned off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts