Twenties Unlaced Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts If we wants info from him we need to ban IMTTS. He will come back with new user name he should be banned whenever members found him out. As annoying as Penn/IMTTS is, you can't just ban him for being contrary to whatever the consensus is, that's ridiculous. If he got around a ban using a new log in, than aye kick him out. If he's constantly being a dick against the rules, then aye kick him out. In regard to Mimms, Mimms should just carry on, if what he hears is legit then he can rightly say 'i told you so'. But you can't ban someone for not believing him, that's just daft. Exactly, Penn/IMTTS/Sean get called all sorts of things for going against the grain, one of them even gets a ban for it. But the people calling them cunts don’t. This place is a year 8 playground. If you ever want your account deleted just give me a shout Don't like the forum? Don't visit it. Easy. I do like the forum, but enjoy reading other people’s differing views. Bans and name calling seems childish that’s all. Didn’t realise making that point would create so much heat. On topic, I disagree with the IMTTS perspective. As I’ve said previously I think there is a coordinated effort to discredit the original directors test so they can position a different judgment and eventually push the takeover through. This is going to take plenty of time, especially if they end up in court. The timeframes are exactly what the NCSL guys are trying to reduce with any pressure they can generate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Tbh I agree I wouldn’t ban him. Think people should just ignore his posts. Don’t give him what he’s looking for I don't have to ignore him it is Mimmis who got fed up with him. Thus we are not getting extra info from him. You guys can be cool with no extra info for now or ban anyone who is against Mimms until takeover completes . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenC Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Gates to the city heliport are open this morning. It's clearly happening, somebody check the flight tracker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Tbh I agree I wouldn’t ban him. Think people should just ignore his posts. Don’t give him what he’s looking for You guys can be cool with no extra info for now or ban anyone who is against Mimms until takeover completes . Mimms=forum Jesus. I’m hoping he doesn’t turn out to be Charles Manson! He does seem on the button re the fan driven action but I’ve not seen anything of note regarding actual takeover news. Possibly because nothing is happening or barring the real inner circle no one knows. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Absolutely completely agree that IMTTS should not be banned for posting his view, in the same way that I shouldn't be banned for calling him a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn't he banned initially for doing what he's continuing to do now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn't he banned initially for doing what he's continuing to do now? For saying he knows what Mimms' source has told him? Or for having a differing view? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn't he banned initially for doing what he's continuing to do now? For saying he knows what Mimms' source has told him? Or for having a differing view? Contributing nothing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn't he banned initially for doing what he's continuing to do now? For saying he knows what Mimms' source has told him? Or for having a differing view? I wouldn't say that IMTTS has a differing view as such. IMO, the tone of their posts has always been "I know exactly what's going on and you're all wrong". All I can go on is what I see written on here and being honest, have always felt that Penn/IMTTS has had a source and their confidence always said to me that they must know something. However Mimms has proven, I think, to be ITK. As they are saying quite the opposite to one another, one of them is either lying, being badly mis informed by their source or taking an angle to wind people up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Tbh I agree I wouldn’t ban him. Think people should just ignore his posts. Don’t give him what he’s looking for I don't have to ignore him it is Mimmis who got fed up with him. Thus we are not getting extra info from him. You guys can be cool with no extra info for now or ban anyone who is against Mimms until takeover completes . :lol: You are deranged Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn't he banned initially for doing what he's continuing to do now? For saying he knows what Mimms' source has told him? Or for having a differing view? No. But then you know that anyway. As tedious as you are in here at least you engage with others and use other parts of the forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 And what is the connection to the takeover here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 And what is the connection to the takeover here? People speculating that they could be moved brick by brick (at a canny expense) to make room for the expansion of SJP. Can’t see it sadly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 People are deluded if they seriously think that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Another duck lined up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 I’ll bet it’s got nothing to do with the takeover Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Very coincidental that some listed property has been tied up by a middle east firm? I'm sure the Reubens would have been aware of this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Very coincidental that some listed property has been tied up by a middle east firm? I'm sure the Reubens would have been aware of this? Why would they be? Reubens are mostly invested in property development. This is a property that is already developed, and is in an area of Newcastle that isn’t being developed. It isn’t a property they would be interested in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Clearly the Qatari’s have bought this for a laugh in the event takeover is approved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 UAE national team just sacked their national team manager, 6th manager in three years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonjam88 Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn’t it the fact the owners of the building didn’t want the east stand expanded due to it blocking the light? Nothing to do with the fact it is a grade listed building. If it’s owned by any potential club owner then you wouldn’t have someone stopping any expansion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Couldn't it be to setup offices or hospitality linked to the club? If there aren't any plans to move the club to a new ground any time soon then some decent renovations to listed buildings could be an option perhaps, not that they look like they need it by the way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waddles mullet Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Seriously? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Wasn’t it the fact the owners of the building didn’t want the east stand expanded due to it blocking the light? Nothing to do with the fact it is a grade listed building. If it’s owned by any potential club owner then you wouldn’t have someone stopping any expansion? I thought it was actually the land that was needed, but you might be right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts