Hudson Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 1 minute ago, Shearergol said: A one month rule? Bizarre. It gives them time to implement a more long term rule. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 A month ffs? I'd agree with them that it is a ridiculous loophole that everyone thought was dogshit when city done it. But in light of our takeover, just makes them look fucking small-time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Cunts! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, Scotty66 said: Lasts for a month apparently. Not sure what kind of effect that will have but I feel this is the start of an absolute barrage of things coming our way to try and prevent us from spending big. They also intend to propose this rule should be a permanent rule. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Shirley that doesnt matter because man city have already set precedent with their huge deals.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 "It's all about human rights" Yeah, looks like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Next up, a rule that says NUFC aren't allowed to win anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 None of them were bothered about The Spirts Direct Arena of that tatty advertising all over the stadium from our previous owner though…. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpeth mag Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Just now, Dr Venkman said: Next up, a rule that says NUFC aren't allowed to win anything. Think they passed that about 50 years ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Whatever the top sponsorship deal is, surely we will be allowed to match it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Tsunami said: None of them were bothered about The Spirts Direct Arena of that tatty advertising all over the stadium from our previous owner though…. Oh yeah, party related sponsorship is sound as long as the other PL clubs think the offending club is getting £10 and a curly wurly. Edited October 18, 2021 by NE27 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 I think we could soon well see one of the Saudi teams buying one of our youngsters for about 500 million This is bullshit though, everyone is so fucking jealous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 If they'd bought Man U there'd have been nowhere near as much of this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Whenever we went down Ashley had no problem giving us interest free loans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 1 minute ago, Dr Venkman said: If they'd bought Man U there'd have been nowhere near as much of this. Man u would've just made sure the notion never made it to the PL table tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) I mean I can’t see how this is legal unless teams like Leicester and Man City have to remove their current owner-based sponsorship arrangements. Edited October 18, 2021 by Fantail Breeze Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, STM said: Whatever the top sponsorship deal is, surely we will be allowed to match it? You would think (plus an amount for deal inflation since it was signed), but im guessing not. Would be a very dangerous path for the league to dictate who and for how much clubs can do deals with Edited October 18, 2021 by geordie_b Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Premier League right now We're just all their chickens coming home to roost Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Im sure we'll be able to tie the legals up! You can't stop a business trying to make money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 1 minute ago, Fantail Breeze said: I mean I can’t see how this is legal unless teams like Leicester and Man City have to remove their current owner-based sponsorship arrangements. Anti competitive, as Charnley allegedly pointed out. It’s impossible for some clubs to have these sponsorship deals currently in place, but then refuse to let another club have a similar deal from this point in time onwards. Methinks DeMarco might be earning some more money in the very near future… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Why the hell is this a "1-month" thing? This makes my blood boil because it's so fucking bent. It's reactionary response less than 10 games into a season? Fuck right off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 We love hoying the anti competitive accusation about like! Mind you, we have every right. As said, be interesting to see if Leicester change the name of their ground and shirt sponsor. Fucking laughable if not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 How are Man U paying for the south stand refurbishment ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) Is Charnley still still at the club? The owners can't be that worried if they sent him to represent Edited October 18, 2021 by duo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Kanji said: Why the hell is this a "1-month" thing? This makes my blood boil because it's so fucking bent. It's reactionary response less than 10 games into a season? Fuck right off. It's temporary until they get more rules in place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now