Jump to content

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, McCormick said:


Nice area. Shame about the traffic and weather these days though! If you’re here for a while and need anything, feel to DM me :)

 

Appreciate it, thanks. :)

 

I'm working in the ATC tower at the airport, finishing around 3:30 so the traffic so far hasn't been too bad. Though it took ages to get back this evening, but I was late out.

 

Not sure how long I'm here for. Tomorrow was supposed to be my last day with a flight home Wednesday morning, but it's now looking like it'll be extended by another 2 days. I find out tomorrow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, midds said:

"fair market value" is such a bullshit phrase and vague use of terminology man. It'll get ripped apart in any court. Just do the fucking deals ffs [emoji38] 

 

 

Oh that day is coming ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gaztoon said:

 

 

Oh that day is coming ?

Imagine it man. "Well a similar performing club to you only managed to get £2.357m for their shirt sleeve so you're not allowed to get any more than that. It's unfair if you do as it wouldn't be fair. It's unfair if you get more than them so no, you can't be allowed to sign that deal. That's not fair"

 

Fuck me man :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gaztoon said:

Crazy when you think about it really..

 

Imagine a company being stopped from making the same revenue as its competitors because their deemed not big enough ?

It's just the same as the 5 subs thing, they just kept voting till they got their way even though the smaller clubs didn't want it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gaztoon said:

Crazy when you think about it really..

 

Imagine a company being stopped from making the same revenue as its competitors because their deemed not big enough ?

 

I can honestly see in the not too distant future that legal action will be taken, most likely us also

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we’re allowed a deal like that for the sleeve sponsorship when we fought relegation last season, you can understand why the owners wanted to wait a season to see what we can get away with next year after a potentially higher finish. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, midds said:

Imagine it man. "Well a similar performing club to you only managed to get £2.357m for their shirt sleeve so you're not allowed to get any more than that. It's unfair if you do as it wouldn't be fair. It's unfair if you get more than them so no, you can't be allowed to sign that deal. That's not fair"

 

Fuck me man :lol:


Well quite :lol:. Not sure what people think is gonna happen. There’s going to come a point when the fans realize that Saudi Arabia buying Newcastle means that you’re actually an elite club with as much money as you want, and no longer an outsider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

I'm not sure that is correct, infrastructure, community, youth & women's football spending still seem to be excluded from the FFP calculation by Annex J.4 of the new regulations. But I've only briefly looked at it and a lot of it goes over my head, so  might be completely wrong.

 

https://editorial.uefa.com/resources/0274-14dc03ef33b9-3e2caa872860-1000/20220408_club_licensing_and_financial_sustainability_regulations_2022-en.pdf

 

 

Kieran McGuire doesn’t seem to think it will effect premier leagues own FFP rules and all fine 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...