SUPERTOON Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, sushimonster85 said: Chelsea would have to be mad to loan a player to Man U. Fair enough if a big bid comes in, but why would the do a favour for a team there's still (a very outside) a chance will be a rival. Probably because they know there is no chance of them being a rival this season and if the offer is good enough they will take it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 17 minutes ago, Rich said: Why would Chelsea do that deal, though? Only other club that’ll pay his full wages, probably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 19 minutes ago, Rich said: Why would Chelsea do that deal, though? Because the big six have inflated everything so much they are the only one who can afford each other’s players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 10 minutes ago, McCormick said: Only other club that’ll pay his full wages, probably. Plus they probably don't see them as a serious threat any more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 4 minutes ago, McCormick said: Only other club that’ll pay his full wages, probably. I said this in this thread or another one. It's Man U, Juve, Atleti type clubs are the only clubs that can pay Chelsea players' wages. Everyone else and Chelsea / the player will need to take a loss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 More chat about Connor Gallagher in the Times. Good player, I'd be very happy with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnes23 Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Loan or permanent? Would much prefer the former as with all the Chelsea links Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 (edited) Ok, I’m currently setting my heart on (myself up for disappointment regarding…) Ramos, Gallagher and a.n.other (possibly Pedro). Edited August 17, 2022 by Coffee_Johnny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Not sure going into the current shambles of Man U would be a clever career move for Pulisic, even on a loan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Think Pulisic is pie in the sky for us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Still have a feeling it'll be Pacqueta permanent and CHO on loan... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 9 minutes ago, 54 said: I called it! It's such a Juventus signing. 2 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said: Think Pulisic is pie in the sky for us Aye some big boys are getting linked. Gallagher is one of few Chelsea players I think is on wages we could pay or improve. Can see Conor being forced to extend it and then moving on loan with no option to buy. Previous Chelsea regime loved that move. Didn't work a lot of the time though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Italy would be a good move for him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyc35i Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 No way Pulisic ends up with us as much as I would love it to happen. He will consider himself an elite level player that should be playing for a champions league side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingxlnc Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Pulisic is game changer the same way Diaby would be. Can definitely see us interested as we seem to be going for very highly rated talents. Pulisic, Pacqueta and Pedro. Perfect. All the P’s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 I think Paqueta’s name should either be banned or censored at this point until credible reports of us bidding for him. I remember the Skjelbred days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 1 minute ago, Kimbo said: I think Paqueta’s name should either be banned or censored at this point until credible reports of us bidding for him. I remember the Skjelbred days. He's one player at that level that I can see buying into the project. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Most reports are saying we will sign 2 more max, Howe himself has said 1/2 more in if possible. Think people will be disappointed if they expect any more than that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 I think if the club wanted him then he’d be here now, simple as that. Apart from that the only link to us I can is that we have signed his mate. It’s a position that isn’t a priority for us atm - we are in desperate need of some quality at RW and some competition for Wilson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 There's nothing beyond gobshite twitter speculation linking us to Pulisic, yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Re: Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Just now, Mike said: There's nothing beyond gobshite twitter speculation linking us to Pulisic, yeah? A fair few journalists have said we've asked to be kept informed on Broja, Pulisic, Hudson-Odoi, and Gallagher from Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Gallagher is the lad that looked outstanding at times for Palace? I fuck with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 Just now, Rich said: Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true. Which is interesting, and also makes Joe Wilocks position questionable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts