Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, 54 said:

 

I called it! It's such a Juventus signing.

 

2 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said:

Think Pulisic is pie in the sky for us

Aye some big boys are getting linked.

 

Gallagher is one of few Chelsea players I think is on wages we could pay or improve.

 

Can see Conor being forced to extend it and then moving on loan with no option to buy. Previous Chelsea regime loved that move. Didn't work a lot of the time though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kimbo said:

I think Paqueta’s name should either be banned or censored at this point until credible reports of us bidding for him. I remember the Skjelbred days.

He's one player at that level that I can see buying into the project.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if the club wanted him then he’d be here now, simple as that. Apart from that the only link to us I can is that we have signed his mate. It’s a position that isn’t a priority for us atm - we are in desperate need of some quality at RW and some competition for Wilson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mike said:

There's nothing beyond gobshite twitter speculation linking us to Pulisic, yeah?

 

A fair few journalists have said we've asked to be kept informed on Broja, Pulisic, Hudson-Odoi, and Gallagher from Chelsea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rich said:

Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true.

Which is interesting, and also makes Joe Wilocks position questionable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, r0cafella said:

Which is interesting, and also makes Joe Wilocks position questionable. 

 

Think this was always the case, tbh. Joelinton and Bruno are nailed-on, and Shelvey was probably ahead of Willock before his injury.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rich said:

 

Think this was always the case, tbh. Joelinton and Bruno are nailed-on, and Shelvey was probably ahead of Willock before his injury.

Think we could recoup our money on him? Obviously he wouldn’t be shifted this summer but next summer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rich said:

Re: Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true.


He’d be a perfect “Howe” style player and would complement Bruno and Joelinton superbly imo.

 

If we got him in then we’d have some real strength in depth in CM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...