JT24 Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 They’re banging on about Article 17 again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weznufc Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 1 minute ago, JT24 said: They’re banging on about Article 17 again. He can't use it can he? Don't even know what it is 🙈🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 This article 17 shit was debunked weeks ago. Expected better of Marcotti. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JT24 said: They’re banging on about Article 17 again. Cant be bothered to give him a click. What's Article 17 ? Edited August 19, 2025 by Robster Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 Just now, GeordieDazzler said: This article 17 shit was debunked weeks ago. Expected better of Marcotti. Da clicks innit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 Alexander the Grate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 Just now, Robster said: Cant be bother to give him a click. What's Article 17 ? You’re better off investing in “Minus 17” if you’ve not watched it yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 2 minutes ago, Robster said: Cant be bothered to give him a click. What's Article 17 ? https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/the-final-isact Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 5 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said: https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/the-final-isact Good read that. Can somebody send the flat pack rat a copy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagPar Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 (edited) Jamie O'Hara can take his Isak sympathy and fuck off. Twat. We're holding the player to ransom apparently for wanting 150 million. Tell him Ruby. Watch right to the end for the parrot talking to O'Hara. Ps when my depression is at its darkest, I watch this. It never fails to cheer me up. Edited August 19, 2025 by MagPar Additional Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 19 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said: This article 17 shit was debunked weeks ago. Expected better of Marcotti. Yeah, if it was succesfully used for Isak for example it would throw transfers into chaos. Might be good actually as transfer fees would massivelly drop off as who would sign someone for say 100M they lose for half that a few years later however well hes doing. They'll be talking about nato article 5 next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 I thought Article 17 is when they kill all the Jedis? Yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 1 minute ago, jemo96 said: I thought Article 17 is when they kill all the Jedis? Yeah? Thought it was leaving the EU. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Thought it was leaving the EU. Maybe It’s the Jedis leaving the EU? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 A17 doesn't work for players under 27 years old and to clubs in the same Country. So apart from that, great plan. Let him craic on, be great to sue him, his advisors and LFC for £150m we deserve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 This cunt been fined/apologised/fucked off yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 I would suggest that he really doesn't want to get into any legal disputes with PIF, like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverThere Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 32 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Thought it was leaving the EU. I thought it was when Russia invades. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 So has Sulky changed agent or is it just bullshit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 I wouldn't be booing him if he does a uturn and wears the jersey again, his first goal back greeted with total silence in the stadium would do me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 1 minute ago, Holloway said: I wouldn't be booing him if he does a uturn and wears the jersey again, his first goal back greeted with total silence in the stadium would do me I want the Luque celebration at the Mackems from him when he gets his first goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED209 Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 1 minute ago, Optimistic Nut said: I want the Luque celebration at the Mackems from him when he gets his first goal. I loved Albert me. He should have never came to Hollywood though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 5 minutes ago, ED209 said: I loved Albert me. He should have never came to Hollywood though. One of the only highlight videos that picked a non-dogshit song. And it turned out to be way too apt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt1892 Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 (edited) Nineteen days. That's how long it has been since Liverpool's £110m bid for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak was rejected. Since then, there have been no further offers. But it hasn't stopped the future of the 25-year-old Sweden striker being the biggest talking point of the summer window. Will Liverpool bid again? Will he rejoin first-team training in the meantime? What happens if a deal is not completed by the 1 September deadline day? BBC Sport has spoken to a number of sources in an attempt to get the latest on these questions and what might happen next. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ce934rgyg57o Edited August 19, 2025 by Matt1892 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 19, 2025 Share Posted August 19, 2025 If article 17 was easy enough to result in Isak or anyone else terminating their contract, then over night both transfer fees and players wages would collapse. When £100m fees are being paid for players, don’t you think a club would have spent those fees on a legal team to get a player out of his contract at another club instead? People are deluded as fuck if they think it’s going to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now