Jump to content

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Decky said:

 

This was a thing before brexit? 

For non EU players yes. After brexit the fa decided to reform the rules to make it easier for non EU and the EU players to pass the test. So post brexit it’s much easier to get South American players and Africans visas. 
 

it should be dead easy for the EU players, so until someone spells out why klivert has failed, it’s quite unusual.

 

0B813C42-2AEE-4176-A431-639200182244.thumb.jpeg.b34cda45628e58ae92175ee429783479.jpeg

 

 

Edited by FLUMPO235

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the reason is he didn’t play regularly for Roma and he is not an Dutch international 

 

That’s ridiculous. He was on loan to Nice hence didn’t play for Roma. The rules have problems

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zero said:

Apparently the reason is he didn’t play regularly for Roma and he is not an Dutch international 

 

That’s ridiculous. He was on loan to Nice hence didn’t play for Roma. The rules have problems

Putting 2+2 and getting 5, I can only assume it’s an FA thing to protect English players.
 

Rather than clubs hoovering up rubbish foreign players for cheap money and blocking English players coming through, they at least have to have foreign players who have actually played in the top couple of tiers.

 

seems he’s fallen in some obscure crack. 

 

 

Edited by FLUMPO235

Link to post
Share on other sites

He seems like he's being penalised for playing at a big club and nationality of a big footballing nation and being slightly short ability wise of both? If he played for Feyenoord but was American for example, he'd have been fine?

 

 

Edited by Optimistic Nut

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, samptime29 said:

If we play him with Wilson what is formation going to be? 4-1-3-2? Or play 4-3-3 still with Isak on right with ASM on left?

 

Probably the 4-3-3, with ASM sticking more wide, and Isak tucking in more as a inside forward, with Trippier then providing the width. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can't be shoehorning players into our formation by sticking this guy on the right wing, or putting ASM on the right just to play Isak on the left. He is striker. While he seemingly can drift out wide during matches, he's started like 2 matching on LW and RW in his entire career according to transfermarkt. Play him in his natural position together with Wilson, or start him or Wilson on the bench so we have options to change things up during games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit leftfield maybe but I reckon Wilson could be very effective on the right of a front 3 in our current set up. There’s a lot of goals to be had from that position with ASM and Bruno supplying.

 

Trippier keeps the width out there as we know. It’s just whether he could do the defensive work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Conjo said:

We can't be shoehorning players into our formation by sticking this guy on the right wing, or putting ASM on the right just to play Isak on the left. He is striker. While he seemingly can drift out wide during matches, he's started like 2 matching on LW and RW in his entire career according to transfermarkt. Play him in his natural position together with Wilson, or start him or Wilson on the bench so we have options to change things up during games.

I thought it was Howe being diplomatic by saying he can play with Wilson rather than saying "Wilson is a crock, we've bought him in to replace him"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd give this guy as free a role as possible ie behind a main striker either in a 4-3-3 or a 4-4-2. Main reason is he's so good on the ball, lets give it to him as much as possible. Out and out strikers are often feeding on scraps and deprived of space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cronky said:

I'd give this guy as free a role as possible ie behind a main striker either in a 4-3-3 or a 4-4-2. Main reason is he's so good on the ball, lets give it to him as much as possible. Out and out strikers are often feeding on scraps and deprived of space.

 

Not so sure about that. He's proven himself as a central striker/wide forward, scored plenty of goals from those positions as well so don't see how changing that will contribute to his game in any way.

 

Also, your idea means Wood playing up top again and I'd rather just have Isak up there with ASM, Almiron and  Willock/Anderson in behind them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...