r0cafella Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, Froggy said: Wages as % of Revenue Nottingham Forest – 87.9% Fulham – 85.2% Wolves – 82.1% Everton – 79.7% Brighton – 74.3% West Ham – 74.1% Bournemouth – 73.9% Chelsea – 71.9% Newcastle – 71.0% Aston Villa – 70.9% Burnley – 69.4% Crystal Palace – 68.7% Brentford – 65.9% Liverpool – 60.0% Man City – 58.8% Arsenal – 49.0% Sheffield United – 47.1% Man United – 46.9% Tottenham – 44.1% Luton – 43.6% Now do debt as a % of revenue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Surprised to see AFC above MUFC for revenue, mind. Hopefully we'll be allowed to build ours one day without answering to 6 other clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 14 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Now do debt as a % of revenue. It's in the small print that debt due to leveraged buyouts isn't to be scrutinised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 24 minutes ago, Froggy said: Wages as % of Revenue Nottingham Forest – 87.9% Fulham – 85.2% Wolves – 82.1% Everton – 79.7% Brighton – 74.3% West Ham – 74.1% Bournemouth – 73.9% Chelsea – 71.9% Newcastle – 71.0% Aston Villa – 70.9% Burnley – 69.4% Crystal Palace – 68.7% Brentford – 65.9% Liverpool – 60.0% Man City – 58.8% Arsenal – 49.0% Sheffield United – 47.1% Man United – 46.9% Tottenham – 44.1% Luton – 43.6% Wasn't Villa's like 98% or something just last year? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) yeah, I swear it was reported that Villa were in danger of it being 100% and breaching CL rules or something when they signed Rashford and Asensio on loan. A bunch of them took wage cuts in the summer iirc, don’t know if the figures above are taken from then and after Rashford/Asensio left or what. Edited January 22 by Smal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 8 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: Wasn't Villa's like 98% or something just last year? I'm not sure, I just whacked those two graphs into ChatGPT and asked it to work them out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) Quote The study, conducted by cognitive scientists at MIT’s Media Lab, divided 54 students into three groups. Each group was tasked with writing multiple SAT-style essays under different conditions: - One group used ChatGPT - One group used Google Search (ChatGPT and other LLM prohibited) - One group used no tools at all While students wrote, researchers monitored their brain activity using EEG sensors to detect engagement levels, attention, and cognitive processing across 32 regions of the brain. Here’s what happened: The ChatGPT group had the lowest brain activity. They were less engaged and focused, and demonstrated weaker memory and executive function. Their essays became increasingly similar to one another. Teachers who evaluated the work described it as “soulless,” filled with repetitive phrasing and shallow arguments. These students retained little of what they wrote. When asked to revise an earlier essay without the help of ChatGPT, many couldn’t remember what they had written. Over time, they relied more heavily on AI. By the third essay, many students weren’t even pretending to do the work themselves; they were simply copying and pasting AI responses with minimal changes/edits. In contrast, the “brain-only” group, those who wrote their essays with no digital tools, showed: - Higher engagement and stronger brain activity, especially in regions linked to memory, creativity, and problem-solving - Better memory recall and greater satisfaction with their work - More original and thoughtful writing Even the Google Search group fared better than the AI group, showing more active engagement in researching and constructing ideas rather than passively accepting pre-written content. https://oxfordlearning.com/is-chatgpt-harming-students-thinking-skills-heres-what-parents-need-to-know/ Edited January 22 by Smal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, Smal said: https://oxfordlearning.com/is-chatgpt-harming-students-thinking-skills-heres-what-parents-need-to-know/ If you think I'm working out the percentages for 20 teams instead of getting a computer to do it in 15 seconds then you're insane. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 That’s wages. The numbers talked about for UEFA (and the new PL rules) include amortisation and agent fees also. The on the other end it includes a three year average of player sales profit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 The "woe is me" attitude initiated by Pep and being covered widely in the media about how many minutes Haaland has had is pretty tiresome isn't it I'm sure the richest club in the world could work out a way to have a backup striker to rotate with him or manage his minutes better. No one forced Pep to start Haaland against Exeter for example Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Screenshot so I don't give this guy anymore impressions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Worse than that Forest keeper that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 52 minutes ago, Pixelphish said: Screenshot so I don't give this guy anymore impressions. United. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 On 21/01/2026 at 05:35, Anderson said: At least he's dropped the Suarez tribute act for a Pardew one. Meyler's finger point always makes me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 https://x.com/i/status/2014288490528190952 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 3 minutes ago, Slim said: https://x.com/i/status/2014288490528190952 Yasir and co will be along any minute to do the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Popbitch: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 18 minutes ago, BlueStar said: Popbitch: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 I wonder who it is and why it’s Mikel Arteta Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 31 minutes ago, Smal said: I wonder who it is and why it’s Mikel Arteta An embarrassment and a disgrace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) 8 hours ago, Froggy said: Wages as % of Revenue Nottingham Forest – 87.9% Fulham – 85.2% Wolves – 82.1% Everton – 79.7% Brighton – 74.3% West Ham – 74.1% Bournemouth – 73.9% Chelsea – 71.9% Newcastle – 71.0% Aston Villa – 70.9% Burnley – 69.4% Crystal Palace – 68.7% Brentford – 65.9% Liverpool – 60.0% Man City – 58.8% Arsenal – 49.0% Sheffield United – 47.1% Man United – 46.9% Tottenham – 44.1% Luton – 43.6% Man City – 58.8%? hmmm isn't Haaland on like £1mil a week Edited January 22 by duo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 13 minutes ago, duo said: Man City – 58.8%? hmmm isn't Haaland on like £1mil a week They've super high (inflated) revenues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 I think they also hide administrative costs inside City Football Group, so their wage number is much closer to playing staff only while everyone else's includes support staff. And who knows what else they are hiding in there... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 This is some read. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now