Wullie Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 19 minutes ago, Disco said: Have they? Don't know whether it shows it works or it's not being implemented in that league but I've never seen anyone binned in the Northern League games I've been too. Aye we saw it at Seaham Red Star a couple of weeks ago as we were thoroughly confused about what the hell was going on. Been going for 5 years according to this but it was the first time I'd seen it. https://northernleaguetalkblog.wordpress.com/2019/03/22/sin-bin-rules-to-be-implemented-in-the-northern-league-next-season/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, gdm said: I would say I’m happy not to have to share any part of the ground with someone that said trans people were nonces much like I’d be delighted to never have to sit next to someone that’s called someone a racial slur. I’m fairly confident in myself I won’t tweet such things. I understand your point of view and if there was any sort of doubt or grey area I’d agree but she tweeted some absolutely vile stuff. No place for that in football or society imo the key point is someone complained to the club and the club didn’t like what they saw. Any sympathy I had was well gone when she lied and said all she said was sex was real and then went on a right wing tour defending herself anyway we’ll move on. Aye we're all grown ups here - we clearly hold different values and that's OK. Agreed on the complaint being the catalyst for the ban, the club was put in a position and it acted. Not sure how much you read of my previous responses, but I do also think everything that's she written is abhorrent, just want to make that clear I'm not condoning her actions or views. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 (edited) It happens pretty often. Not an everyday occurrence but definitely pretty regular in the NL. As far as I'm aware it's only for dissent. To be honest there has been occasions I've even missed it happening - as I don't believe they show a card. Only noticing afterwards when the player comes back on or it's mentioned by others there. Edited February 8 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Can just see it, a blue for dissent in the 88th minute up 2-1 to Liverpool, and oh what's that. Ten minutes ET. Cool cool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 (edited) What happens if a keeper is sin binned? Chaos presumably. Edited February 8 by Turnbull2000 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said: What happens if a keeper is sin binned? Chaos presumably. Sounds excellent tbf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 11 minutes ago, ponsaelius said: It happens pretty often. Not an everyday occurrence but definitely pretty regular in the NL. As far as I'm aware it's only for dissent. To be honest there has been occasions I've even missed it happening - as I don't believe they show a card. Only noticing afterwards when the player comes back on or it's mentioned by others there. Genuinely never seen. TBF I can barely remember seeing much dissent, way more likely a ruck with other players than anything to the officials. My main takeaway from non-league games and stuff that has changed has been linesman being called liner not lino. Hideous scenes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Liner is the correct non league parlance I'm afraid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Currently 96% of decisions are correct? Who is deciding that they’re correct? Imbeciles https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68233297 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 39 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said: What happens if a keeper is sin binned? Chaos presumably. Rush goalies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, wormy said: Rush goalies. Rush goalies was when the keeper could play outfield too. There was another one for anyone in the box could be keeper, can't remember what it was called. Spot goalies maybe? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, loki679 said: Rush goalies was when the keeper could play outfield too. There was another one for anyone in the box could be keeper, can't remember what it was called. Spot goalies maybe? We played 'fog man back' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 minute ago, loki679 said: Rush goalies was when the keeper could play outfield too. There was another one for anyone in the box could be keeper, can't remember what it was called. Spot goalies maybe? Interesting. I imagine this will become a regional debate. A quick Google says others definitely called it rush too but the official definition is indeed in line with you. Every day is a school day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Ian W will be along in a minute to tell us they played 'Readily Interchangeable Custodians' when he was a lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, Jaqen said: We played 'fog man back' That and "rush goalie/keeper" were the same.thing round our way. Rush goalie when the keeper can play outfield? Like they can anyway ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 28 minutes ago, wormy said: Rush goalies. Just be like having Beasant back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Rush goalies were the precursors to todays sweeper keepers. We were tactical geniuseses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 The blue card idea is utterly absurd Less so the idea as I understand the frustration behind it but moreso the referees are struggling with things as they are, adding another element of significant decision making is hardly going to make things better I give it one game where the inconsistencies are highlighted and no doubt the bigger teams will benefit from it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancrate1892 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 On 07/02/2024 at 16:22, christ said: Two things: 1) These aren’t jokes or concerns. She’s basically peddling far right conspiracies. 2) She unmasked herself by posting this shite publicly in her own name. Conspiracies? Was it not an opinion? That she thinks a man is a man and woman is woman? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 What a crossover Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 19 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said: The blue card idea is utterly absurd Less so the idea as I understand the frustration behind it but moreso the referees are struggling with things as they are, adding another element of significant decision making is hardly going to make things better I give it one game where the inconsistencies are highlighted and no doubt the bigger teams will benefit from it Can't be having Crap Bruno spending 80 minutes in there for his petulance, can we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 35 minutes ago, Beren said: What a crossover why? I mean I loved Undertaker as a kid but what the hell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Are these decisions gonna be VAR checked too? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Rush keeper = goalie can be an outfield player Fog man back = anyone can be goalie if they’re the last man in defence Any other interpretation is quite simply utter nonsense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now