Kid Icarus Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, gdm said: Quite unlikely. If someone triggered Bruno’s release clause there’s fuck all anyone could do about it You can't both argue that we should have sold him while claiming it would happen via a release clause. It was either our responsibility or it wasn't. Not saying you're saying that, but those were the two points made earlier by someone else. Edited 7 hours ago by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: You can't both argue that we should have sold him while claiming it would happen via a release clause. It was either our response or it wasn't. Not saying you're saying that, but those were the two points made earlier by someone else. Unless I got it wrong someone said they would sell him for £100m which was the release clause. Now if you are suggesting we sell Bruno cheap then yes that’s a different matter and would get an angry crowd at St James park Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 13 minutes ago, gdm said: Unless I got it wrong someone said they would sell him for £100m which was the release clause. Now if you are suggesting we sell Bruno cheap then yes that’s a different matter and would get an angry crowd at St James park Yes, it was his release clause amount, which is what makes any 'would sell' argument that was being made moot. It's not our responsibility for other clubs to meet a release clause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now