Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

NUFC Transfer Rumours

Guest

by Guest
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

cubaricho

cubaricho

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, BrianSwan said:

Can't you sell your womens team to yourself for 100 mill?


Isn’t our women’s team like two or three tiers below someone like Chelsea’s? :lol: 

 

 

Edited by cubaricho

Link to post
Share on other sites
toontownman

toontownman

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, cubaricho said:


Isn’t our women’s team like two or three tiers below someone like Chelsea’s? :lol: 

 

 

 

"Obviously we didnt want to sell our women's team at any price. We turned away many offers but the 6 billion final offer was too hard to turn down. Fair market value is so subjective."

Link to post
Share on other sites
Geordie Ahmed

Geordie Ahmed

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, jonny1403 said:


we signed him for £20m on a five year deal. After one year his book value is now down to £16m. So a sale for £10m now would represent a £6m loss for PSR purposes.

 

What part of that do you think is incorrect?

 

Maybe I'm mistaken about how it all works but surely in that scenario getting £10m (and taking the £6m PSR loss) is better than him staying for the next 4 years doing nowt? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

 

Maybe I'm mistaken about how it all works but surely in that scenario getting £10m (and taking the £6m PSR loss) is better than him staying for the next 4 years doing nowt? 

That depends. 

 

Our revenue are growing so his cost as a % of our revenue is decreasing as well. Also the longer keep hold of him the lower the loss we actually take on him is. 

 

If we want him off the books, the best time to do it is when we have additional head room to spend so probably not this FY. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
et tu brute

et tu brute

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, cubaricho said:


Isn’t our women’s team like two or three tiers below someone like Chelsea’s? :lol: 

 

 

 


According to Stefan Borson yesterday, Chelsea sold their team for that amount due to their potential come 2050.
 

He reckoned a few will go down the same road, with 100 million plus amounts, now that the 20 clubs voted to stop the Premier League closing this loophole. He also reckons Villa will do this in the next few days to overcome their PSR issues. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites
MileyCyrus

MileyCyrus

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, tgarve said:

That wasn’t the fee we signed him for though - look at the records 

 

Regardless of this our PSR situation probably isn't a problem this year. We've had 2 years where we should have made a profit or thereabouts, and anyone we sign this summer will be amortized.

 

I imagine our issue is overspending this window will fuck us in the future like the first two years did last year, so I imagine we'll be comfortably within our PSR limit this year regardless of who we sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ads

ads

Posted
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Rocker said:

Let's hope his eczema doesn't flare up. 

 

My thoughts exactly. Failed medical because he forgot to apply his hydrocortisone that morning.

 

 

Edited by ads

Link to post
Share on other sites
Harry 209

Harry 209

Posted
Posted

I found a copy of the Chronicle on Monday and read John Gibson's column about transfers. Probably the first time I've read John Gibson since the SBR era.

One of the worst articles I've ever read, he's just rambling on and has zero insight or anything new or interesting to say.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Optimistic Nut

Optimistic Nut

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Harry 209 said:

I found a copy of the Chronicle on Monday and read John Gibson's column about transfers. Probably the first time I've read John Gibson since the SBR era.

One of the worst articles I've ever read, he's just rambling on and has zero insight or anything new or interesting to say.

 

 

I do think it's a shame these are so far off the ball now. They were genuinely one of the best sources for links up until Ashley and they dried up. Miss the days of seeing the billboards with new target mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yorkie

Yorkie

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

I really can't believe that our transfer targets are just all star players from other PL clubs. Makes no sense :lol:

 

 

 

 

I don't think there's any evidence for that. Not to 'say the line, N-O!' but the journos really do know next to nothing. It makes sense that the only crumbs they have are domestic ones. As far as I know we haven't peddled Steve Nickson so I don't see why we won't have targets on the continent too.

 

We clearly have a desire to invest in dependable talent but I'd be delighted with another 2023 summer; where we sign three proven PL players and one Euro Sexgod. You can't fault the strategy at this point I don't think.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AyeDubbleYoo

AyeDubbleYoo

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

I don't think there's any evidence for that. Not to 'say the line, N-O!' but the journos really do know next to nothing. It makes sense that the only crumbs they have are domestic ones. As far as I know we haven't peddled Steve Nickson so I don't see why we won't have targets on the continent too.

 

We clearly have a desire to invest in dependable talent but I'd be delighted with another 2023 summer; where we sign three proven PL players and one Euro Sexgod. You can't fault the strategy at this point I don't think.


Nah that’s what I mean, it’s funny that every link is just to a really obvious name. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...