Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

NUFC Transfer Rumours

Guest

by Guest
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

KaKa

KaKa

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JT24 said:

Bobby Clark, maybe or maybe not, coming home. 

 

We're definitely going to get another CM in to replace Longstaff, but really like the idea of getting Clark in as an additional one because Willock is just too much of a liability.

 

This is apparently a loan with a £5 million option too.

 

This kid was very highly touted and got some games when he was even younger at Liverpool and looked very promising.

 

If he hasn't settled in Austria and has been made available think they should go for this.

 

 

Edited by KaKa

Link to post
Share on other sites
The Butcher

The Butcher

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Wolfcastle said:

From the very little highlight form I've seen of Rudoni he's tidy, great goal against somebody, as a backup like that lad from Sheffield United we were linked with  fair enough. Tall lad, Scandinavian. But, on reflection, what became of him.

 

 

 

Sander Berge. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Toon No9

Toon No9

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

We're definitely going to get another CM in to replace Longstaff, but really like the idea of getting Clark in as an additional one because Willock is just too much of a liability.

 

This is apparently a loan with a £5 million option too.

 

This kid was very highly touted and got some games when he was even younger at Liverpool and looked very promising.

 

If he hadn't settled in Austria and has been made available think they should go for this.

Would be a good low risk signing. Good for the homegrown quote aswell!

Link to post
Share on other sites
gdm

gdm

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

If we ended with...

 

Out: Dubs, Kelly, Longstaff, Wilson, Isak

 

In: Ramsdale, Thiaw, Rudoni, Elanga, Wissa, Sesko.

 

How would we be feeling?

 

It'd feel like a much stronger squad, but a weaker first team.

Šeško and maybe elanga aside it’s very uninspiring and if say Villa had signed those other 3 players I wouldn’t be at all worried 

 

 

Edited by gdm

Link to post
Share on other sites
NSG

NSG

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

If we ended with...

 

Out: Dubs, Kelly, Longstaff, Wilson, Isak

 

In: Ramsdale, Thiaw, Rudoni, Elanga, Wissa, Sesko.

 

How would we be feeling?

 

It'd feel like a much stronger squad, but a weaker first team.


Give us Ramsdale (loan), Guehi, Gallagher (loan with obligation), Elanga, Wissa and Šeško, then we’re cooking on gas.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LFEE

LFEE

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

If we ended with...

 

Out: Dubs, Kelly, Longstaff, Wilson, Isak

 

In: Ramsdale, Thiaw, Rudoni, Elanga, Wissa, Sesko.

 

How would we be feeling?

 

It'd feel like a much stronger squad, but a weaker first team.


That we’ve set a precedent that other teams in our division can take our best players when they choose. So regardless of team or squad strength we’d end it being a much weaker club.

Link to post
Share on other sites
HaydnNUFC

HaydnNUFC

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LFEE said:


That we’ve set a precedent that other teams in our division can take our best players when they choose. So regardless of team or squad strength we’d end it being a much weaker club.

 

A million percent, this. The message selling Isak to Liverpool sends is just too appalling to comprehend even with incomings.

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

If we ended with...

 

Out: Dubs, Kelly, Longstaff, Wilson, Isak

 

In: Ramsdale, Thiaw, Rudoni, Elanga, Wissa, Sesko.

 

How would we be feeling?

 

It'd feel like a much stronger squad, but a weaker first team.

5/10 must do better. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
alexf

alexf

Posted
Posted

The other issue, if we did go on a late splash with the Isak money if it comes in, is even if we get all the positions and depth we wanted covered, they would have had no bedding in time and there will be very little time on the training ground this year for Howe as he stated last time we were in CL. 

 

Which is partly why he was pushing us to try and do business early. 

Relying on new players to play on instincts alone and with very little patterns and relationships with others developed. 

 

Fuck Isak and Liverpool man, they really didn't help our situation this summer. However there are other factors that contributed to this chaotic window.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nufcjmc

nufcjmc

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, alexf said:

The other issue, if we did go on a late splash with the Isak money if it comes in, is even if we get all the positions and depth we wanted covered, they would have had no bedding in time and there will be very little time on the training ground this year for Howe as he stated last time we were in CL. 

 

Which is partly why he was pushing us to try and do business early. 

Relying on new players to play on instincts alone and with very little patterns and relationships with others developed. 

 

Fuck Isak and Liverpool man, they really didn't help our situation this summer. However there are other factors that contributed to this chaotic window.

Not ideal is an understatement but at this stage getting the players we need in would  be an achievement in itself.

 

Also not sure when champions league fixtures start in terms of fixture congestion so while not ideal new signings in next few weeks may get "managed minutes" while we bed them in. Striker wise not so much if isak goes but even if he stayed and him leaving wasn't a thing the "injury" has meant he ain't had a preseason anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
KaKa

KaKa

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, LFEE said:


That we’ve set a precedent that other teams in our division can take our best players when they choose. So regardless of team or squad strength we’d end it being a much weaker club.

 

Unless of course ... the manager has weighed things up and thought this guy is a bit of a moody twat and he's always moaning about his groin hurting.

 

Let's get rid and put the money towards making the squad on the whole stronger and keep all the guys that are fully bought in.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Displayname

Displayname

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

If we ended with...

 

Out: Dubs, Kelly, Longstaff, Wilson, Isak

 

In: Ramsdale, Thiaw, Rudoni, Elanga, Wissa, Sesko.

 

How would we be feeling?

 

It'd feel like a much stronger squad, but a weaker first team.

If we are selling Isak I would want bigger statement signings at CB and CM. Not that I know much about them, just going after what transfermarkt values them at.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PauloGeordio

PauloGeordio

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Unless of course ... the manager has weighed things up and thought this guy is a bit of a moody twat and he's always moaning about his groin hurting.

 

Let's get rid and put the money towards making the squad on the whole stronger and keep all the guys that are fully bought in.

If he can't get Isak to commit then 100% Eddie will. Isak is tainted goods now. A clean slate and new faces in that want to be here. It'll turn out all good this you watch. We might just find we get what we need.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mazzy

Mazzy

Posted
Posted

Clark back in this summer for £5M (next summer) feels like a no brainer to me. 

 

£5M doesn't seem much in comparison to the prices we've been hearing for players over the last 6 weeks but it is a fair whack considering this kid has proven nothing so far. You've just got to trust the club to know whether it's worth getting him back or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ronson333

Ronson333

Posted
Posted (edited)

From Ornstein late yesterday:

 

Everton have made an improved bid for Southampton winger Tyler Dibling.

Southampton are yet to respond to the offer, which is worth in the region of £40million including add-ons, but they are seeking a higher fee for the teenager, and it is expected to be rebuffed.

Everton have already seen an opening offer for Dibling turned down this summer. He is keen to return to the Premier League, having never played in the Championship, following Southampton’s relegation last season.

The 19-year-old’s contract at St. Mary’s runs until 2027 and he has also attracted interest from Aston Villa and Newcastle United.

 

https://archive.ph/Yhuxt

 

 

 

Edited by Ronson333

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...