midds Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Sounds like they're just finding things to stall things long enough for Man U to shift a bit of their shite on so they've got enough to to actually lodge a decent bid tbh. Can't blame them, there's a month to go and they want to cash in The bid we made should have been more than good enough but these stunts get pulled I suppose. Gives the club a decision to make - stick or twist. Got no issue with whatever they decide Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 I’m about to go and play with traffic on the A1. This is tedious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Just now, relámpago blanco said: Sounds close if that's it though. They want what we offered plus a sell on clause. Just offer them 20% profit on a sale. Why? 20% is potentially a huge chunk of money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Must be a reason why he‘s using insufficient and not rejected? Must be close to an agreement? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 1 minute ago, KaKa said: How are the club less convinced by him too? Because Isak was our first choice, Sesko is like our 4th at best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boey_Jarton Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 53 minutes ago, Froggy said: He's at Manchester United mate, 3 years younger than Isak with a better trophy to his name and a European final. He also scored more Champions League goals as a 20 year old for Man United than Isak has in his whole career. That's where Hojlund is. Fair play. You go to such great lengths to twist arguments in favour of positions I am not even sure you believe in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Just now, LFEE said: Why? 20% is potentially a huge chunk of money. 20% on profit? All depends when we sell him. Year left on his contract it’s all good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 1 minute ago, midds said: Sounds like they're just finding things to stall things long enough for Man U to shift a bit of their shite on so they've got enough to to actually lodge a decent bid tbh. Can't blame them, there's a month to go and they want to cash in The bid we made should have been more than good enough but these stunts get pulled I suppose. Gives the club a decision to make - stick or twist. Got no issue with whatever they decide Yep. Feels like an absolutely blatant attempt to stoke Man Utd's interest. Info probably came from the agent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 1 hour ago, Froggy said: He's at Manchester United mate, 3 years younger than Isak with a better trophy to his name and a European final. He also scored more Champions League goals as a 20 year old for Man United than Isak has in his whole career. That's where Hojlund is. Surprised Liverpool aren’t moving on to Hojlund tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 He hasn’t even put pen to paper, and Ornstein’s already framing it like we’re just a stepping stone. Typical agenda-pushing horseshit from the usual suspects in the media. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Magpie Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Just now, SUPERTOON said: If that's the case move on, haven't got time to fuck about On the flip side surely we wouldn't have made a record breaking bid if Sesko hasn't indicated he's interested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Just now, Rafalove said: Because Isak was our first choice, Sesko is like our 4th at best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Sell ons seem a bit ridiculous when you get to that price range of player mind. In cases like Trafford, City selling for a lowish fee but having a sell on makes sense but not when you're already paying an absolute premium for a player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 2 minutes ago, Shearergol said: 20% on profit? All depends when we sell him. Year left on his contract it’s all good. On profit maybe but not overall fee. Anyone he’s going to Man Utd and we will have Isak and Wissa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 The tweet itself is very interesting and wording as well from Oren. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 (edited) 'Fears on the North East' ye knaa wtf We'll go in one more time for him providing Man U haven't agreed a fee by then. Feels extremely backwards we haven't agreed anything with him beforehand. We are starving of course. Edited August 2, 2025 by nemtizz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 How many times can we be fucked about man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 A sell on clause could be worth 10-20 million, who knows. Just deciding to keep Isak and getting Wissa done would simplify our lives. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Don’t love that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 Hope says hope and Crook says fear. They clealy don’t know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Clickbait. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 8 minutes ago, Memphis said: I cannot help but think our lack of a legitimate negotiating leader has played a big part in allowing the process to be so open and public. We used to get things done before anything was even announced. We are no longer buttoned up and hy That seems a tad harsh IMO. It's a function of the wider environment, where selling clubs are incentivised to incite bidding wars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoricGinola Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 8 minutes ago, KaKa said: Transfers are usually down to what the manager and club think. I'm pretty certain they're not bidding that amount for a player they don't think is worth it. Their track record is also outstanding of late, and so if you "hate" the way the club is being run because of this bid ... that is just astonishing. Its not just this bid, the whole place is rudderless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyn davies Posted August 2, 2025 Share Posted August 2, 2025 If Leipzig or Sesko ,don't want to deal with us then walk and take the opportunity away from them to reject us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now