Benjamin Šeško (playing for Man United)

[RodneyCisse]

Give them a sell on, he might never leave. Jobs a good in.

[KaKa]

We included a sell on for Sociedad in the deal for Isak.

 

Let's get back in there and negotiate one with them. Stop mucking about.

[gdm]

Isak staying then 

[Ronson333]

Sell on and buy backs should be banned, making football so fucking boring.

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

[nemtizz]

Most blatant attempt at forcing a bidding war I've seen.

[Dokko]

Just now, Ronson333 said:

Sell on and buy backs should be banned, making football so fucking boring.

 

Sell on is fine. Nowt wrong with it at all. Agree on buy backs.

[Ameritoon]

I just want it all to stop 

[Geordie Magpie]

They have probably rejected us wanting Man U to bid so there can be a bidding war 

[Fak]

12/1 for Leipzig to sign him from Leipzig?

[Rafalove]

1 minute ago, KaKa said:

 

Knew it was something to do with the bid.

 

They want a sell on clause included and probably more in add-ons.

 

Think we should not faff about too much with this. Let's tie this up.

 

 

Tbh, I’d be tempted to leave and move on. Of course the issue being that he is already our 4th-5th-6th choice. 80 mil plus a sell on is quite a bit, for an unproven striker.

[1892er]

80m and the cunts still want more

[The Prophet]

Just now, gdm said:

Isak staying then 

 

Pretty sure we'll bid again like. Doesn't sound like there's a massive difference in positions.

[Turnbull2000]

My word this is all very tiring

[oldtype]

Makes perfect sense for them to ask us for a sell on in case Šeško takes off here and is in Isak’s position three years down the road. They want their cut if Liverpool/Real Madrid/PSG or whatever come sign him for 150 million.

[Mattoon]

Can't wait for Man Utd to throw everything they have at this with their £30m + £2m in add ons and a 1% sell on clause

[Kid Icarus]

2 minutes ago, Ronson333 said:

Sell on and buy backs should be banned, making football so fucking boring.

Don't mind sell ons but buy backs definitely shouldn't be allowed like.

 

 

Edited August 2, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[Nucasol]

Higher the fee goes, more I can see Man Utd baulking. We just add it to the Isak fee.

[KaKa]

Just now, Rafalove said:

 

 

Tbh, I’d be tempted to leave and move on. Of course the issue being that he is already our 4th-5th-6th choice. 80 mil plus a sell on is quite a bit, for an unproven striker.

 

We paid £63 million and included a sell on for Isak.

 

These lot want £69 million and a sell on for Sesko.

 

If we really believe in the kid then we need to make this work and stop messing around.

[SUPERTOON]

Wonder if Sesko has accepted then?

[Geordie Magpie]

1 minute ago, Rafalove said:

 

 

Tbh, I’d be tempted to leave and move on. Of course the issue being that he is already our 4th-5th-6th choice. 80 mil plus a sell on is quite a bit, for an unproven striker.

I think our choice order for top striker ( potential Isak replacement) was 

Pedro

Ekitike

Sesko

 

Looks like to replace Wilson it was Delap then Wissa.

 

How far down our target lists are we gonna have to go before landing what we need?

[nemtizz]

£69m doesn't buy you 13 goals in the Bundassliga

 

 

Edited August 2, 2025 by nemtizz

[Nucasol]

Just now, KaKa said:

 

We paid £63 million and included a sell on for Isak.

 

These lot want £69 million and a sell on for Sesko.

 

If we really believe in the kid then we need to make this work and stop messing around.

£6m inflation in 3 years - hardly dramatic.

[SAK]

2 minutes ago, RodneyCisse said:

Give them a sell on, he might never leave. Jobs a good in.

Aren’t sells only if you make a profit on the player? Get it done I say, if he’s that good and we make a profit we pay a little to RB and if he’s shit it doesn’t matter.

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

3 minutes ago, Fak said:

12/1 for Leipzig to sign him from Leipzig?

Good Eachway bet