All Activity

Aye he did but he also knows Sima has thousands of posts on there all very confusing

Not sure about number one but by all accounts, he's a massive number two.

I'm certain Ruxpin said he didn't bother with their forum when he first emerged

Tbf, he is the only one that literally never misses a match.

Tent staycation in his mam’s yard. She brings him ham and pease pudding stotties, a Blue Riband, carton of Um Bongo and Space Raiders for his packed lunch.

So I didn't actually say you would be relegated. More bullshit Ruxpin . How long before you piss off again like the coward you are

Im not referring to external sponsors. I'm talking about related party ones.

Maybe they're waiting for a few resolutions regarding PL clubs v the Premier League before deciding a longer term strategy. That's all I've got, otherwise, what the fuck are they waiting for

It's that kind of graft that got him to number one.

Thank you, lord thank you. It’s as jarring as when Americans say “I could care less”.

Its not the big ticket stuff that sponsors are clamouring for but as debated we have had none at all for years. The club were actively looking as mentioned in the fan stuff last year. Unless we can sign something massive to make up for it holding out now for say 10m a season when we could have got say 4m 3 seasons ago (just to confirm plucking figures out if fresh air here). Also as debated previously signing something short term as a stop gap unless it would be used as a way to limit a new deal down the line could have helped the bottom line in the here and now.

Thats the thing init. Spurs training ground and kit is 20 million a year. We would probably be allowed half that. As Eales and Silverstone said, we shouldn't undersell ourselves atm by rushing into sponsorship deals. We should grow our brand and then sell ourselves when the brand is at its peak. From a fan perspective we will say let take 10 million now and re negotiate later as the brand grows. From a business perspective that makes no sense whatsoever.

Exactly.

They’ll have been tapping him up for a year. We need to box clever with Isak as those slippery cunts will be trying to grease him.

Was it something along the lines of "We don't want to accept any old offer as to undervalue the opportunity?" Which is absolutely fine if / when a mega offer comes along further down the road.

So he's playing... chess?

Virgil Dan Vijk?

Lee doesn’t take holidays

Sima to the mackems is Gary Lineker to the gammons, absolewtely obsessed.

Club are busy at the Mitchell leaving lunch so nowt to report

All the local journos on their jollies?

I'm not just comparing the Barnes' deal with "some of the biggest flops" at all. We signed one of the most talked about players in the Premier League for £38 million, someone who had several years experience playing in the league. Why do you think they're quoting £60 million for the likes of Joao Pedro? That's the going rate for good players with PL experience. £38 million was on the lower end of what I expected us to pay. Christ, we sold Ayoze for £30 million four or so years earlier and very few were arsed that he'd left.

My issue with Chelsea's transfer policy is they're spending a crazy amount of money however, Palmer excluded, are they ending up with any world class players? For the money they're spending, they should be planning on winning the league, but I don't see them having the first xi to do that, because they seem intent on having 4 good players for every position rather than 2 great ones. The are spending top 2 money but buying top 6 players which fucks us because they end up competing in our market whereas really they should be buying players in the tier above.